Michael Moore, and those ‘called to the Word’; the Methodacy of Daniel Berrigan and William Stringfellow

 

Michael Moore and the Prophetic Regard: the Truth at the Last Day

 

 

Can’t talk about Daniel Berrigan without mentioning where he hid; at the house of Stringfellow.

 

Of which little is said nowadays; saying he was gay.

 

Such is not the case; of course.

 

Few will coutenance the fact that William Stringfellow lectured people about morals and committment whilst himself was evidently a homosexual; but this is rather beside the point; as might be said about James Baldwin’s own observations about the black christian race in America in “Go Tell it on the Mountain”  without brandishing his own sexuality as a banner to which others might flock, who were Christian: and also homosexual.

 

The Men of Sodom;  the Last Judgment, and the Lord of the Second Advent

 

                    The Word of God, and the View of those who sit as the Jury:

         The 12 Apostle’s of the Lamb and the Last Judgment

Homosexuality has then been with us since long before the days of my Father Lord Jesus; whose foresight of what was to come upon the Men of Sodom still looms large for those who wonder what these men who operate in a spiritual reality in a spiritual city that is Sodom: as of an invisible geography of their sexual location in relation to other men; but as with all things where the Lamb is concerned the appearence is misleading; if one wants the truth one has to see what is uncovered at the End.

The Fall was of an angel; then a woman; and then a man; at the second and more universal fall we have the third of the Host of the Angel then with the Daughters of men; and then afterwards the men of Sodom who tried to violate the angels Michael and Gabriel who came to the house of Lot to see him.

As my Father Jesus did say of his second coming in the guise once again of the unseen Son of Man who Ezekiel and Daniel were also called themselves by that curious term so that “as it ways in the days of Lot; so shall it be in the days of the coming of the Son of man”.

In present Last Day we have the Men of Sodom seemingly all around us,

     visible in almost every segment of our western society.

 

In the Judgment they are represented in four rather broad categories:

 

A.)   Virgin to men; but not to women; married and even with families: but secretly desiring men. For men where thus is unconscious they are “latent” homosexuals; where it is conscious but unfulfilled they are “extant” homosexuals. These men are Supressed in either case; the latter being deferential as aware of their desire; the former sufferantial as unaware of it.

With some of these ”self-suppressed” men they end up leaving these families and become strictly engaged with men; usually after their children are older and on their own.

B.)   Not virgin to men nor virgin to women; but married to women with children; but secretly having relationships outside their marriage with men. These men are self-Repressed; and usually find in their marriages they are Oppressed.

C.)   Not virgin to men; but virgin to women; having relationships only with men; and never married. These men are pretty rare however; as most gay men have had some female contact of some kind, which they often blame on unfortunate occasions that happened to them against their wills; as being taken advantage of under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.

D.)   Virgin to both men and virgin to women; but secretly desiring men.

 This curious category of men who have had no sexual contact with either sex but who do have a hidden preference had they the opportunity to have the one of their desire also happens to include one apostle whom my Father Lord Jesus called “a devil”; the one who appeared to everyone as an “angel of light”; even rebuking Jesus in his father’s house ( Simon the Leper was the father of Judas ) and striking the Shepherd with the Sword of God; of which the Sufis themselves define by saying “the Sword of God is ‘the hungry stomach’s of the Poor’.” ( This definition is seen “Caravan of Dreams: by Idries Shah on page 131 ).

 Judas angrily criticized Jesus and even condemned him in self-righteous anger for wasting 300 pence of ointment on himself; this expensive ointment called spikenard that Mary of Bethany poured over him at the house of Judas Iscariot’s father: Simon the Leper. This was from the one whom John identified as being the thierf who stole from the bag; he was the treasurer; but also Hermes; the god of thieves….

 But in reality Judas was also insanely jealous of Mary of Bethany because he was in love with Jesus himself; and not in a good way; but as a Sodomite; which means he didn’t imagine himself satisfying Jesus in the form of a woman: but in the form of a man; and this man happened to be the real identity of Judas himself in the flesh: the son of Perdition; the discarnate image of God; which happened to be the Son of Man who was the New Image of God in Christ himself; who symbolized Seth; as the original Copy of the lost image of Adam and his direct likeness; which always had had to be recovered. This the lamb did; but arose with the face of someone else: David.

(    For the Baptism of Jesus unto his death was actually the Resurrection of David unto his life…this is the face that Peter and John and James  saw on Mt. Sion; the Mount of Transfiguration { “and his visage became altered” }; Mt. Hermon; also called Ba’al-Hermon; where the third of the host of the angels came down when they fell: thus Mt. Sion is also the real Olympus..)

Few know that Judas’ father Simon and Judas himself were both from Bethany also; Judas knew Lazurus and his two sister’s quite well; Martha and Mary of Bethany. The two women are also the prototypes of the Kingdom as the 10 virgins that both secretly represent the Divided Kingdom who Lord Jesus called later on two distinct hands; the 5 wise virgins, as of Mary of Bethany who listened at his feet and gathered the “oil of gladness”; and the 5 foolish virgins, as of Martha who made a show of being responsible but who ignored Lord Jesus and his message entirely; and gathered no “oil”; except the “oil of sadness” when Mary went in and she was left outside. So one is a “false” left hand; and one is a “true” left hand. For just as soul and spirit are the two hands of God the male and female repreent the two feet of God.

Judas then also appears as “an angel” or “minister of righteousness”; the devil whom Jesus called one of his closest companions and who had the position of the treasurer; although John calls Judas a thief. This same Judas Iscariot; who secretly desired Jesus himself.

Thus we have a strange question answered: when Jesus says to Judas these words; to wit;

       “Betrayest thou the Son of Man with a Kiss?”

The Men of Sodom in the days of Lot

Homosexuality has then been with us since long before the days of my Father Lord Jesus; whose foresight of what was to come upon the Men of Sodom still looms large for those who wonder what these men who operate in a spiritual reality in a spiritual city that is Sodom: as of an invisible geography of their sexual location in relation to other men; but as with all things where the Lamb is concerned the appearence is misleading; if one wants the truth one has to see what is uncovered at the End.

The Fall was of an angel; then a woman; and then a man; at the second and more universal fall we have the third of the Host of the Angel then with the Daughters of men; and then afterwards the men of Sodom who tried to violate the angels Michael and Gabriel who came to the house of Lot to see him.

As my Father Lord Jesus did say of his second coming in the guise once again of the unseen Son of Man who Ezekiel and Daniel were also called themselves by that curious term so that “as it ways in the days of Lot; so shall it be in the days of the coming of the Son of man”.

In present day society we have the Men of Sodom represented in four rather broad categories

A.  Virgin to men; but not to women; married and even with families: but secretly desiring men. For men where thus is unconscious they are “latent” homosexuals; where it is conscious but unfulfilled they are “extant” homosexuals. These men are Supressed in either case; the latter being deferential as aware of their desire; the former sufferantial as unaware of it.

With some of these ”self-suppressed” men they end up leaving these families and become strictly engaged with men; usually after their children are older and on their own.

B.  Not virgin to men nor virgin to women; but married to women with children; but secretly having relationships outside their marriage with men. These men are self-Repressed; and usually find in their marriages they are Oppressed.

C. Not virgin to men; but virgin to women; having relationships only with men; and never married. These men are pretty rare however; as most gay men have had some female contact of some kind, which they often blame on unfortunate occasions that happened to them against their wills; as being taken advantage of under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.

D. Virgin to men and virgin to women; but secretly desiring men.

 This curious category of men who have had no sexual contact with either sex but who do have a hidden preference had they the opportunity to have the one of their desire also happens to include one apostle whom the Lord Jeus called “a devil”; the one who appeared to everyone as an “angel of light” even rebuking Jesus and striking the Shepherd with the Sword of God; which the Sufis themselves say that the Sword is “the hungry stomach’s of the Poor”.

 Judas angrily criticized Jesus and even condemned him in self-righteous anger for wasting 300 pence of ointment on himself; this expensive ointment called spikenard that Mary of Bethany poured over him at the house of Judas Iscariot’s father: Simon the Leper. But in reality Judas was insanely jealous of mary because he was in love with Jesus himself; and not in a good way; but as a Sodomite; which means he didn’t imagine himself satisfying Jesus in the form of a woman: but in the form of a man; and this man happened to be Judas himself in the flesh: the son of Perdition; the discarnate image of God; which happened to be the Son of Man himself; who symbolized Seth; as always.

Few know that Judas’ father Simon and Judas himself were both from Bethany also; Judas knew Lazurus and his two sister’s quite well; Martha and Mary of Bethany. The two women are also the prototypes of the Kingdom as the 10 virgins that both secretly represent the Divided Kingdom who Lord Jesus called later on two distinct hands; the 5 wise virgins, as of Mary of Bethany who listened at his feet and gathered the “oil of gladness”; and the 5 foolish virgins, as of Martha who made a show of being responsible but who ignored Lord Jesus and his message entirely; and gathered no “oil”; except the “oil of sadness” when Mary went in and she was left outside. So one is a “false” left hand; and one is a “true” left hand. For just as soul and spirit are the two hands of God the male and female repreent the two feet of God.

Judas then also appears as “an angel” or “minister of righteousness”; the devil whom Jesus called one of his closest companions and who had the position of the treasurer; although John calls Judas a thief. This same Judas Iscariot; who secretly desired Jesus himself.

Thus we have a strange question answered: when Jesus says to Judas these words; to wit;

       “Betrayest thou the Son of Man with a Kiss?”

Men of Sodom in the Days of Lot

Advertisement