The Further Uncovering of the Whole Truth:
Jill Stein at Standing Rock with Dennis Banks…
“Before I left the Dakota Access front-line, I expressed gratitude for the display of unity among demonstrators and protectors from all over the country who have camped out in protest.
We must stop the Dakota Access pipeline, which is about as long as the Keystone XL pipeline. One pipeline leak can destroy drinking water for millions of people in the Midwest and desecrates sacred land.
The Planned Nuclear Destruction of
the Shiite Nation of Iran
Why Saudi Arabia Paid Hillary Clinton to Do It
Mossad Motto: By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War
Few are aware of the reason that Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab states gave the Clinton Foundation milions of dollars. Some have thought it was in response to the weapons deals that Secretary Clinton was able to do for the House of Saud in selling them 65 billion dollars worth of high tech fighter jets.
But this was only a thin veneer and veiled cover for what she promised to do for them as soon as she was in Office as President: obliterate Iran with a limited nuclear attack with Israel providing the necessary cover. Before I discuss why the Saudi Royal Family wants this done to make Totalitarian Wahabism, the most reactionary form of Islam ever conceived, as their overriding Paradigm for the Sunni faith; established as the truly degenerative form of Islam that it is, and nothing more but a license to kill Shiites for the entirety of the Muslim Jihadists under their control by their financial support and theological backing.
We can look at this scenario as having been engineered by Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, Hillary’s main man in foreign relations with the Arab Gulf States. here is what has been said by Medea Benjamin at the Huffington Post, in her blog titled “Hillary Clinton, The Podesta Group And The Saudi Regime: A Fatal Ménage a Trois on 8/31/2016
“…If I told you that Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is a registered foreign agent on the Saudi government’s payroll, you’d probably think I was a Trump-thumping, conspiratorial nutcase. But it’s true.
The lobby firm created by both Tony and John Podesta in 1988 receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government, a government that beheads nonviolent dissidents, uses torture to extract forced confessions, doesn’t allow women to drive, and bombs schools, hospitals and residential neighborhoods in neighboring Yemen.
The Podesta Group’s March 2016 filing, required under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, shows that Tony Podesta himself oversees the Saudi account. At the same time, Tony Podesta is also a top campaign contributor and bundler for Hillary Clinton. So while one brother runs the campaign, the other brother funds it with earnings that come, in part, from the Saudis….”
Ever since my good friend Lawrence Flynn died I have been taking his advice about following the sage advice from his cousin Richard Hoffman and opened up channels with his contacts in Israeli Intelligence within the close-knit family of the active Mossad Psy-Ops and covert agents in the Middle East Theater and Europe, especially with their postings on their web pages which are always updated hourly and always at least a week ahead of the Americans on just about everything.
But their rebellion against Netanyahu due to his megalomaniacal persona is mirrored by the US Intel revolting against FBI Director Comey and AG Loretta Lynch because of the treasonous operatives of undersecretary Patrick Kennedy working for Hillary Clinton in the DOJ, as spoken bitterly about by those disgruntled agents in the NSA who thought Hillary was more than culpable in revealing the location of the Ambassador and even the names of CIA operatives; some of whom were killed due to her criminal negligence; and who voiced their concerns about the breaches in National Security to Judge Andrew Napolitano before he was fired by Fox News.
A Must See Exposition:
Background and Context of Hillary Clinton’s Operation ~
Exposed by a soon coming “Expert Witness”
for NY State Attorney”Preet” Bharara’s ongoing Investigation
Charles Ortell and the Clinton’s Global Charity Fraud
The Unveiled Sins of Omission:
~ Living a Lie ~
How Legality is not the Same as Morality
“…When one’s Rhetoric matches one’s Ethic, we can then truthfully claim that the exemplar not only ‘talks the Talk’; but also then ‘walks the Walk’. The problem in our current political Theatre of the Absurd is that all the feckless fools ask of their candidates is that they are to be lied to with the correct but meaningless phrases and categorically correct but ultimately empty promises: so as to remain morally superior to those they are tacitly letting lie to them by being the political hypocrites that they demand that their candidates be; so as to dissonantly allow themselves to remain knowingly and yet happily oblivious of their own hypocrisy in aiding and abetting those they know are deceiving them to their own ignorant liking so very well !!!…” Salvation Rose
We often see public figures use a variety of excuses to explain why they should not be arrested and put in jail when they are caught red-handed like the rest of America’s law-abiding citizens. Usually we are astonished when a small technicality or legalistic loophole is somehow applied that was never even heard of before to shield some important public figure from prosecution.
First of all, the main problem in dealing with the rich and powerful in trying to enforce legal consequences on them for failing to uphold the Law is that even when such figures are caught breaking the Law a different standard is applied to the rich and influential persons in our society for acts that would see you or behind bars in a nanosecond.
As my prescient readership is now wanly aware, the direction I am leading them in this exposition of our current corporate sponsored slow-motion coup d’état is one in which I am now going to show my followers the true distinction between our congenital liar Hillary Clinton and a real candidate; so that the arguments of the braying pack of rabid Clintonistas can be put to rest for once and for all; to finally put an end to their purblind exoneration of all the crimes of their Wall Street Madam and their insistence that we all join them and sail down the primrose path to perdition; with the purported blessing of Bernie Sanders himself as their proud standard of our obedient surrender and inevitable endorsement of Hillary Rodham Clinton for our President.
The protestations of the true blue Bernie Believers like Claudia Stauber and Susan Sarandon and all the rest of us is that Bernie Sanders was robbed of his victories in all the primaries where there was not a paper trail to authenticate the actual votes; and which has been met by the DNC criminal co-conspirators of Madame Clinton with derision and howls of feigned indignation; as all Bernie supporters are then accused of being “sore losers”, a host of complaining, petulant children who cannot admit that Hillary won “fair and square”, as Bill Maher so contrarily stated that very accusation to our horror on his show, as he adamantly decided not to face the facts of the Electoral Fraud perpetuated on the American public but to even go so far on his show as to deny the charges even existed in reality.
But now let us look at little closer at the main problem facing people of conscience and probity in 2016, who need some ultimately defining reason to leave the Hillary train wreck, but cannot quite put their finger on the real issue.
“…Hypocrisy is the homage that Vice pays to Virtue…”
de la Rochefoucauld
The Difference between Conscientious Morality and Amoral Legality
Let me use the following example to highlight the real dilemma facing the average American voter. In America today it is perfectly legal to have sex with a horse. You doubt my veracity??? Well then:
Let us look at the data.
What this means is this: according to the Law it would be legal for Hillary Clinton to have sex with a horse in these 16 States, one Territory and one District:
Alabama; Arkansas; Washington, D.C.; Guam; Hawaii; Kentucky; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; Ohio; Texas; Vermont; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming
Thus, for Hillary’s brainwashed and adulatory worshippers, the only problem with Hillary hypothetically being caught on camera having sex with a horse that her campaign would have would be in whitewashing ( Whitewatering?? ) her act to the American public by convincing those poor voters of their gross error of wrongly accusing and thus impiously sinning against God by “judging others”, thus reprimanding those ill-advised miscreants with the Gospel of Christ who naively insisted that even though she did not break the Law by having sex with a horse (“with No Name”) that they still considered her actions with the horse to be morally reprehensible.
In the probable word of rebuke to Hillary’s critics by Bill Clinton: “If having sex with a horse was good enough for Empress Catherine the Great, it’s good enough for our next President.”
But for Hillary and her relentlessly amoral campaign to win the White House at any cost there is NO SUCH THING as “Morality” when it comes to the letter of the Law and any issue of Morality regarding the actions of Hillary Clinton or her equally amoral and now openly admitted philandering husband Bill Clinton, as his friendship with a billionaire criminal predator and pedophile bears open witness, accordingly known to all in the media as an ongoing relationship with a man who was caught by the police and did time, and whose media exposure by those with access to documents open in the public domain to this same man’s relationship is again known with yet another pedophile and predator, presently defending himself in open court for sexual assault on a 13 year old girl while a guest at this man’s New York Estate; a fellow billionaire friend of Bill Clinton called Donald Trump.
What man do I refer to?
Why it’s a man warmly regarded and called a friend by both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump: a man who everybody employs to fulfill their darkest sexual desires, as long as it’s at his present day “Sick Fantasy” Island, the notorious and infamous Jeffrey Epstein, at home on his private island playing Ricardo Montalban’s Mr. Roarke, with lawyer Alan Dershowitz stepping into the role of Tattoo by trying to get the two lawyers disbarred who are bringing the case against his friend Trump to trial in New York, OH my gosh!! — what a pal !!!
Of course our pal Mr. Dershowitz is more than a casual observer of the denizens of Mr. Epsteins “Lolita Express”, by all accounts…
Bill and Hillary’s friendly neighborhood sexual predator associate and fellow Right Wing conspirator Donald Trump is also is running for the Presidency as well in 2016; apparently on the it’s ok to (allegedly) “rape-a-13-year-old-girl-at-least-once-or-twice-in-your-life because ‘Why-should-Bill Clinton-have-all-the-fun?’..”.
Both men are frequently on the guest list for Mr. Epstein, with Donald vying for his place on the ticket-to-Epsteins-Sex-Slave-Paradise jet along with his current Trump Presidential Ticket, and PLEASE just remember this important fact: it’s ok to hang out with a sexual predator as long as he’s a billionaire, makes sure his sex slaves don’t have infectious diseases, and donates lots of money to the Clinton Foundation, just like the 100K the Donald forked over recently.
Oh…and lets you aboard his Orgasmic Jet at least 26 times….with at least 5 times documented when Bill Clinton told his Secret Service aides to take a walk…
When it comes to Morality and Legality the difference for the Clintons is ZERO: the question of any Moral Responsibility for the Clinton brood does NOT EXIST: in their minds they are Innocent as long as they don’t actually get convicted and go to jail.
This means that for the Clintons the ONLY SIN is not BEING CAUGHT beaking the Law: that means nothing: the only Sin is GOING TO JAIL FOR IT. This is why the Clintons may be defined as “Amoral Legalists”
But now you ask, being totally aghast in wide-eyed wonder at my assertion, and full of dismay at it’s ramifications: do I have any PROOF???
Can I offer some examples of the Clintonian Code of Ethics in action, per chance???
Alas, yes: quite a few.
But let me put the entire question into proper perspective, so we can adjust our Moral Compass accordingly so that Down becomes Up.
Why Should We Let a Serial Rapist Back into the White House?
We can think of the time long ago and far away Bill Clinton was caught having an affair while in office with intern Monica Lewinsky, yet when he was caught he tried to claim that “sexual relations” referred only to the act of intercourse; and all other acts did not exist according to the Clintonian Canon of Malfeasance under the Law as defined by President Clinton, lawyer: defending himself.
Unfortunately for Bill Clinton the Supreme Court did not see it that way, and he was convicted of lying under oath in an act of perjury and subsequently disbarred: and then put on trial to be impeached by Congress for lying about his behavior. Let us keep this one issue in mind: Bill Clinton was not put on trial for having relations with Monica Lewinsky: indeed, had he made a clean breast of the entire affair when caught he might have still possibly completed his term of office with no further penalties.
No; the REASON he got in trouble is that when he was caught he LIED ABOUT IT and then LIED AGAIN about it even when he was UNDER OATH. If this sounds familiar to you it should be that NOW YOU KNOW WHY it does: because the pattern engaged in by Hillary Clinton is EXACTLY the SAME.
Strangely, in the world of KGB-style Politics today this shameful episode has not been mentioned to my knowledge in over 270 days by the mainstream media, or anybody else for that matter.
Why Would We Let a Corrupt Political Crime Family like the Podesta Group
Back into the White House???
Medea Benjamin at the Huffington Post
“..The Podesta-Clinton-Saudi connection should be seen in light of the recent media exposes revealing the taudry pay-to-play nature of the Clinton Foundation.
Top on the list of foreign donors to the foundation is Saudi Arabia, which contributed between $10 million and $25 million.What did the Saudis get for their largesse and access?
Wikileaks revealed a 2009 cable by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying:
“More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar e-Tayyiba and other terrorist groups.”
Instead of sanctioning the Saudis, Clinton did the opposite: She authorized enormous quantities of weapons to be sold to them.
On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a massive $29.4 billion sale to the Saudis of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by Boeing, a company which coincidentally contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
In a chain of enthusiastic emails, an aide exclaimed that it was “not a bad Christmas present.”
I’m sure the Yemenis at the receiving end of the Saudi bombings would not be so enthusiastic.
The Clintons have said that if Hillary Clinton gets elected, the foundation will stop taking foreign donations.
But what about no longer taking campaign contributions from people who are paid by the Saudi government to whitewash its image?
The Podesta Group should be blacklisted from contributing to Clinton’s campaign until they drop the monarchy as a client and return their ill-gotten gains. If Hillary Clinton wants to be a meaningful symbol for human rights and women’s empowerment, her campaign must live up to the values she claims to represent, and this would be one step in the right direction….”
Medea Benjamin in her blog titled: ” “Hillary Clinton, The Podesta Group And The Saudi Regime: A Fatal Ménage a Trois” ( 8/31/2016 )
The mystery man with the injector pen…..
Why Would We Let Someone Who Is Hiding Being Seriously Ill Back Into the White House ???
One of the problems with Parkinson’s is that it makes mucus build up in the throat, so that breathing and even speaking becomes very difficult, and for those that are suffering from any form of this malady the act of speaking loudly or talking for any length of time is almost impossible, because of a blocking of excess phlegm in the soft tissue of the throat and larynx.
That Hillary Clinton is obviously a very sick woman is no secret, due to the fact that we now know that she sleeps 18 hours a day and cannot stand for 20 or 30 minutes without injections, doctors, or just being held up, so it would seem that an independent counsel to first take her deposition under oath, and then perhaps to have an independent team of doctors take a look at our Presidential nominee might not be a bad idea; while she’s still alive of course, as HPV Papilloma cancer and/or Parkinson’s takes awhile, although with surgery and other treatments one can survive HPV, as actor Michael Douglas can attest.
Today, on Labor Day Hillary in Ohio, September 6th; Hillary was so ill she could not even speak, as she coughed uncontrollably for five minutes…
Not a Well Woman..
Being quite sick and still trying to con her into the White House. attempting to get past the entire National Medical Community as they all observe her getting more and more demonstrably ill, yet all the while denying the reality of what is obvious to all; is just another indication of how dishonest Hillary Clinton intrinsically is, even as she knows she is medically unfit for Office…
Why Would We Let Someone Lying about a Life-threatening Disease into the White House ???
An Actual Diagnosis by a medical expert on Parkinson’s Disease:
Hillary Clinton has Advanced Parkinson’s
September 7th, 2015
On August 14th Secret Service agents approached Joe Biggs of InfoWars with disturbing news: Hillary Clinton has advanced Parkinsons disease…
Why Would We Let Someone who is Dying who Was taken out from the 9/11 Memorial Service Unconscious into the White House ???
of A Former Hillary Clinton Campaign Operative
What is it really like behind the scenes of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: Hectic, stressful and an unforgiving atmosphere where one simple mistake can end your employment, according to a now-excommunicated campaign operative who spoke to True Pundit.
What is it really like behind the scenes of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: Hectic, stressful and an unforgiving atmosphere where one simple mistake can end your employment, according to a now-excommunicated campaign operative who spoke to True Pundit.
Clinton has nearly a thousand paid moving parts in her massive campaign. Our source was well placed and worked with the candidate on a daily basis, or whenever Clinton would show up for work. Some of the following revelations are somewhat disturbing, especially when weighed against the fact that Clinton is campaigning for the most stressful job on the planet. According to our intelligence, she is nowhere near prepared for that job.
We are going bullet format here for simplicity to highlight the dirt dished by Clinton’s ex-campaign guru. Did you know:
*Only a small group of people running her campaign know the specifics of Hillary’s health issues.
But she is suffering from something.
She sleeps approximately 18 hours a day. And some days, she sleeps more.
“I’m serious,” the former operative said. “This is why no one sees her.”
*The campaign will NEVER release her medical files to the public. In contrast, they feel if the opposition continues to hammer the issue, it will create a backlash of sympathy that will likely help Hillary in Nov. when voters could ultimately feel the GOP is picking on Hillary because she is a woman.
*That press conference everyone is waiting for?
It’s been 270 days since she gave a press conference or 280 days.
“Whatever it is. Hillary will NOT be giving
ANY press conferences before the election.”
Why? She doesn’t have to, according to campaign handlers. Her poll numbers have not suffered from not talking to the press but more importantly, Hillary acknowledges that the media has become more of a wild card amid all her scandals and campaign staffers agree it is highly unlikely she could field questions competently without giving Trump fodder to boost his campaign.
Think of Clinton in her orange pants suit making wipe-the-server jokes, the former operative said.
“It was a disaster. They don’t want a repeat of that debacle.”
*Hillary is already being coached for the Sept. 26 Presidential Debate. But the Democratic strategy is bizarre. Her handlers do not think she will respond well to stressful questions or rhetoric so Hillary is memorizing canned answers that may not even directly address the subject or question.
Why is this a viable strategy ???
We’re told this will work because the moderators will not redirect Clinton or cross examine her original answer to a question, regardless of her answer.
This has been negotiated.
So Hillary is free to pontificate without being called on her verbal nonsense, regardless of topic or content. Must be nice.
You can bet no such agreement is in place for Trump.
“The debate is already stacked against the guy,” the former operative said. “Hillary’s lawyers already hammered out her ground rules before the debate questions were even formulated.
It’s a stacked deck. She knows the game and all the referees.”
All the Best Lies in One Place
HA Goodman strikes again
WASHINGTON – Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) today led a group of 50 Members of Congress in demanding that U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch appoint a special counsel to investigate the Clinton Foundation for allegedly using illegal tactics to allow its donors inappropriate access and influence over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
“Seemingly every day the American people learn shocking new details about the operations of the Clinton Foundation. The facts as reported certainly suggest that the Clinton Foundation existed as a slush fund to the State Department where donors received extraordinary levels of access to and influence over then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The fact that over half of Secretary Clinton’s meetings with non-government officials were with individuals who donated to the Clinton Foundation simply cannot be coincidence. The potential implications here are enormous, and the country deserves answers.
“When I questioned Attorney General Lynch last month on her decision to not pursue charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of an unauthorized, unsecured email server, she astonishingly refused to rule out future employment in a potential Clinton administration. She additionally refused to comment on recusing herself from any potential investigation into the Clinton Foundation, despite a well-publicized meeting she had just had with former President Bill Clinton on an airport runway.
It’s clear that at this juncture, and in light of these facts, a special counsel is necessary to ensure there aren’t two tracts of justice in America.
“I’m grateful for the 50 Members of Congress who have joined me in this effort – elected representatives from all corners of the country, including a number of former prosecutors. The people we represent simply want the truth, and we’re committed to delivering it to them,” Ratcliffe said.
(The full text of the letter can be viewed here, or below: )
Dear Attorney General Lynch:
We request you take immediate steps to appoint a special counsel, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.1 to investigate the Clinton Foundation and alleged “pay to play” tactics where donors to the Clinton Foundation were able to obtain inappropriate access to and influence over then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Under Department of Justice regulations, you have the grounds to appoint a special counsel when it is determined “that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted” and that the investigation of that person or matter “by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances.”
We strongly believe that these criteria are met. Consider:
- A recent report by the Associated Press indicates that “At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs.”
- Combined, it is believed these donors contributed as much as $156 million, with 50 giving at least $100,000 and 20 giving over $1 million.
- The report goes on to say “the frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton.”
- Further casting a shadow of doubt over this arrangement is the recent announcement by the Clinton Foundation that it will stop accepting donations from foreign governments if Hillary Clinton is elected President of the United States. This begs the obvious question about why an inappropriately cozy relationship between the Clinton Foundation and its donors with the President of the United States is deemed unethical, but the same relationship between the Secretary of State and candidate for president were not.
All of this makes it very unclear where the State Department ended and where the Clinton Foundation began. Official business of the United States government, the State Department most certainly included, should be conducted in a manner that prioritizes the best interests of the American people, not the special needs of the well-connected donors to a largely unaccountable foundation.
Americans have by and large lost faith in their government and rightfully so. The facts as they have been reported surrounding the Clinton Foundation warrant an investigation that is beyond reproach and beyond any appearance of political favoritism. Appointing a special counsel is a necessary step at this juncture.
The Testimony of Salvation Rose
What people don’t know is that in the Revelation of my Father Jesus that it is the Scarlet Woman, riding upon the Scarlet Colored Beast, that actually represents the Free Market of laissez-faire Capitalism itself Herself, the Great Whore revealed as that Lover of Money, aka “Mammon” or DIS, riding upon the Nation of Red China, who happens to be the one also carrying America’s National Debt, thus showing the entire world that Red China is really not only the owner and master of America at this point, but also, in a sense, the Nation carrying the Woman as the monetary System of Things that the entire World is now enslaved by and servicing; as slaves to the so-called “Free Market”
Capitalism is described as “Creative Destruction”, and here in the Revelation we see good old Creative Destruction arriving wearing a purple dress…..the Creatrix of Hell on Earth, with Red China representing the Spiritual Death as the Wages of Sin in the serving of a Hybrid Consumerist Corporate Marxism as the Discarnate Root of All Evil: all of which comes from serving not God but Mammon.
Of course the Democrats and Republicans say you can serve both; God on Sunday and Mammon the other 144 Hours of the Week: but that is the currently revealed Lie of Western Civilization itself
This is a MYSTERY no longer, at those who read this; at this very Day, and at this very Hour… and of course there’s more to the story…..
Did the Clinton Foundation Steal from the Poor?
Interview with Charles Ortel
The Clintons have many problems these days, but the worst of them is probably the information that Charles Ortel started to release from his website and Twitter account (@charlesortel) in early May 2016. Ortel is the financial analyst who exposed General Electric’s stock as being overvalued before it took a dive in 2008. After 15 months’ examination of the public records of the Clinton Foundation entities, he finds that huge sums of money cannot be accounted for, and he believes that it is a family affair for Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton to harm the victims of disasters and the desperately poor throughout the planet. Educated and privileged people like the Clintons should know better, yet they preen, even now, believing we will fall for the hype manufactured by their handlers.
The true, damning facts, however, are out there for each of us to see.
There is a special revulsion against charity fraud that we did not cover in an earlier interview. We discuss this with Charles Ortel.
Dady Chery: For you, this is a moral issue.
Charles Ortel: It is reprehensible to operate a supposed charity in gross violation of applicable laws and simultaneously seek adulation and the highest political office in the most powerful nation on earth. Such conduct needs to be fully exposed and then punished to set an example.
Charity, the notion of actually helping less fortunate and deserving souls, is an ancient practice prevalent in most cultures. In the United States, it happens that the poorest among us are also the most generous, if you measure their annual donations relative to their annual incomes. Much great work is done by the charitable sector and this important, generally selfless conduct, should be encouraged and admired.
That said, to corrupt a presidential charity under the glare of the publicity that surrounds celebrity followers of the Clinton Foundation is gross, indefensible conduct by educated persons who seem to have no moral compass and no shame.
DC: In your discussions of the Clinton Foundation on your website and elsewhere, Charles, you often bring up the absence of tax audits by the Clinton entities. What is the problem there?
CO: By audits, I mean detailed income statements, balance sheets, cash-flow statements, and footnotes that are double-checked, that is “audited,” by competent, informed and licensed accounting firms. Accounting firms understand the numerous detailed requirements that must be followed as these audits are completed. Furthermore, the management and trustees of large entities, like those of the Clintons, are required to certify that the information contained in these audits is true, accurate, and complete. This is different from the process by which the IRS might decide to audit a given tax return. All financial information provided to the IRS by charities whose revenues are above a low threshold must procure financial statements and supporting information that are audited and must make this work available to taxing authorities and to the general public.
The Clinton entities have repeatedly failed to get their financial statements properly audited. This is an ongoing abuse. I believe they got away with this probably because Lois Lerner was a key person in the IRS who oversaw tax-exempt charities, including the Clinton entities, from 2001 through 2013. She left her post in disgrace. She is alleged to have used the IRS to target conservative and Tea Party groups, and she might also have used her influence with regulators not to target charities of politically allies.
DC: A lot of funds were collected by Clinton entities for recovery from natural disasters.
CO: Shortly after leaving the White House in January 2001, Bill Clinton teamed with Rajat Gupta, then managing partner of consulting giant McKinsey, and since convicted of criminal misconduct, to, in theory, aid victims of an earthquake that struck on January 26, 2001 in Gujarat, India. Records available in the public domain for this charity, American India Foundation, show clearly that it was organized on the basis of a false and materially misleading application to the IRS, that it failed to provide compliant financial audits, and that it failed to make complete, truthful and regular filings in numerous US states where it continues to solicit donations using the mails, telephones, and digital media, in stark violation of applicable laws. Bill Clinton has served as Honorary Chairman for this entity since inception, a fact that is used prominently in fundraising campaigns. Nevertheless, his role with this illegally operated charity is not disclosed in Clinton Foundation filings with state, federal and foreign authorities.
Starting in January 2001, Bill Clinton became involved in international activities that he pursued invoking the name of the Clinton Foundation; these included disaster relief in India and fighting HIV/AIDS in many nations, including in Haiti starting in 2003. None of these international activities were validly authorized in advance by the IRS, US state governments, or foreign governments, as is legally required. Especially in the early period, Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation did not have adequate and sufficiently trained staff to exercise tight and effective controls over these international activities. As a result, it appears that substandard and even adulterated drugs manufactured by an Indian supplier then called Ranbaxy may have been distributed in numerous countries under the auspices of the Clinton Foundation.
Later, Bill Clinton became involved with George H. W. Bush, starting in 2005, in fundraising efforts to, in theory, aid victims of the Tsunami that devastated many Asian nations in the December 2004. Fundraising efforts in this case were also not documented properly or organized in full compliance with applicable state, federal, and foreign laws.
Beginning in August 2005, former presidents Clinton and George H.W. Bush mounted additional illegal and improperly organized efforts to, in theory, aid victims of Hurricane Katrina. Defective forms and filings related to this effort are available, following persistent digging, but omitted from the Clinton Foundation website, though some of the purported financial effects and other supposed accomplishments are covered in various materials found there, including press releases, annual reports and tax filings, that are riddled with accounting errors for 2005, in particular.
DC: What do you perceive as being the most serious problem with fund collection for disaster relief?
CO: When natural disasters strike, many of us are motivated to help however we may be able to do so. As we became more connected on the internet and more comfortable sending money using internet services, larger and larger sums started flowing towards those who represented they might be capable to aid victims of natural disasters. Unfortunately, this incoming money flow, in tiny bites is a perfect opportunity for fraud. Fraudsters realize that portions of this money might be picked off operating unregistered charities with names and websites that seem legitimate. This is why the FBI warns donors to be wary when it comes to making contributions after natural disasters.
DC: I often say: “What happens in Haiti doesn’t stay in Haiti.” Given the real prospect of another Clinton presidency, should Americans worry?
CO: It is more than ironic that the United Homeless Organization, which used to have seemingly poor people at tables all over New York with glass jars to collect money, was revealed as a fraud back in November 2009.
As it happens, the Clinton family was homeless and in severe financial distress back in 1998. Since then, public reports suggest they have acquired vast wealth during a period when most in America have struggled. It seems more than fair to ask exactly how one squares reaping massive financial gains with efforts supposedly led by the Clintons to engage in “charitable” work, particularly given rampant and material defects in all public filings of Clinton-related charities from inception to date.
When the Clintons last occupied the White House they were destitute, according to published reports, and America was in a far stronger position strategically and economically, compared to other nations, than now.
Absent controls, and a US president is difficult to stop, an enriched Hillary Clinton and her extended family are likely to run roughshod over political enemies and competitors in ways that are terrifying to contemplate.
DC: Could some good come from this?
CO: It is certainly possible that Hillary Clinton may win the presidency before the whole truth becomes known regarding operation of and fundraising for the Clinton Foundation and all its related entities.
Alternatively, if the general public digs into the facts and goes to the public record, justice may be administered to all those centrally involved in perpetrating what seems to be the largest and most far-reaching charity fraud ever attempted anywhere on earth.
The downfall of Hillary Clinton and of her family for having, in my view, illegally used a charity to derive personal financial gains might then become an example not to follow: a cautionary tale useful, in future, to constrain others from even daring to consider such pursuits.
DC: Thank you Charles.
Dady Chery is the author of We Have Dared to Be Free. Photographs two and four by Alex Proimos; three from The Oglethorpe University archive; five by Zoriah; six from the archive of Cristal Montanez; seven from the archive of ILO in Asia and the Pacific; eight from Nazareth College archive; and nine by Gilbert Mercier.
The Drumbeat of Investigation after Investigation
into the Rapidly Failing Health of Hillary Clinton
Why is Hillary being followed everywhere by a neurologist and seizure specialist, and cannot walk unaided, stand up for more than 15 minutes or even climb stairs???
She has Narcolepsy !!!!
(… She sleeps “18 hours a day….or MORE!!!”…)
“Following his termination, a visibly shaken Seaman posted a video to YouTube discussing what happened and assuring his viewers that he is not suicidal. He repeatedly asserted that he is not accident prone and does not currently own a vehicle — clearly signaling that should anything happen to him, make sure he is added to the Clinton Body Count.”
Here is the video Seaman made after his termination:
Media Orgs Donate to Clinton Foundation:
Then Downplay Clinton Foundation Scandal
Google ‘Clinton AP story’ and see what happens
By Liz Crokin • 08/29/16 5:50pm
Hillary Clinton speaks at a press conference announcing a new initiative between the Clinton Foundation, United Nations Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies, titled Data 2x on December 15, 2014 in New York City.
Hillary Clinton speaks at a press conference announcing a new initiative between the Clinton Foundation, United Nations Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies, titled Data 2x on December 15, 2014 in New York City. (Photo: Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
Hillary Clinton and her media allies have been working overtime to put out numerous fires that continue to pop up and spread during the final weeks of her campaign for president. Recently, the flames have gotten more difficult to smother as reports of Clinton’s frail health have bled into the mainstream media, despite the unanimous and unilateral decision by the MSM to treat anyone who even raises a question as akin to a Holocaust denier. (On Sunday night, for example, Huffington Post fired contributor David Seaman and deleted his columns simply for linking to a Hillary health video that’s been viewed four million times.)
Julian Assange stoked more flames when he suggested a murdered DNC worker was the Wikileaks source for the DNC hack. Most recently, the Associated Press released a blockbuster story concluding that more than half of the people Clinton met with as secretary of state gave donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Despite these ongoing scandals, Clinton’s close yet questionable ties to media outlets such as Google, CNN, PBS and The New York Times have seemed to pay off. These entities have gone out of their way to censor negative stories about Clinton, particularly ones involving the Clinton Foundation. There’s one common thread though these media outlets suppressing harmful Clinton stories all share: they’ve donated to the Clinton Foundation.
On Aug. 23 the Associated Press broke the story citing that more than half the people outside of the government that Clinton met with as she served as secretary of state gave money to the Clinton Foundation, either personally or through companies or groups. The AP report concluded that 85 out of 154 people she met with from the private sector either donated to her charity or pledged commitments.
The AP drew this conclusion by reviewing some of Clinton’s schedule from when she was secretary of state. They obtained these records after a federal judge ordered the release of them stemming from a lawsuit they filed against the State Department in 2015. (The AP is reporting that the State Department won’t finish releasing the rest of Clinton’s schedule till after the presidential election despite their request for it by October 15.)
This bombshell, compounded with Clinton’s use of a private server as secretary of state, is fueling allegations that she was involved in a pay-to-play operation. But the story has been suppressed by Google in its searches—just as it has done in the past with stories that paint Clinton in a negative light.
When searches related to this story were entered into the Google web browser last week, results for “Clinton AP story” were limited to stories from leftwing publications discrediting the story—including this report from Vox: “The AP’s big expose on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess.”
The same terms in a Bing search yielded more balanced headlines, like “Clinton campaign, AP battle over story on foundation ties” from Market Watch.
Once again, Google has gone out of its way to censor damaging reports about Clinton.
When users typed “media coverage of the Clinton Foundation” into Google it returned results such as CNN’s “Associated Press Botches Hillary Clinton report and response.” In Bing, one gets articles such as “Mike Pence Slams the Media and Clinton Foundation in Virginia.”
The New York Times has taken its censorship a step further; the day after the AP story broke there was no mention of it in their entire paper and this has remained the case until late Monday afternoon—a week later—when Maggie Haberman finally mentioned that “[Clinton] and her campaign have denounced an Associated Press report.”
On Sunday, CNN’s “Reliable Sources” host, Brian Stelter, defended Clinton and attacked AP’s Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll. Instead of questioning Clinton’s dubious conduct as Secretary of State, Stelter questioned why the AP published the story in the first place and labeled it as “misleading.”
Hillary Clinton and husband, Former U.S. President Bill Clinton address the audience during the Opening Plenary Session: Reimagining Impact for the Clinton Global Initiative on September 22, 2014.
Hillary Clinton and husband, Former U.S. President Bill Clinton address the audience during the Opening Plenary Session: Reimagining Impact for the Clinton Global Initiative on September 22, 2014. (Photo: Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)
Paul Joseph Watson, editor-at-large at Infowars.com, is responsible for bringing concerns of Clinton’s health into the mainstream media. Watson consulted doctors and detailed the evidence of Clinton’s health problems in a YouTube video that has gone viral amassing almost four million views.
Since then, many well-renowned doctors, neurologists, and radiologists have expressed concerns for Clinton’s health publicly.
Beth Israel Medical Center’s Dr. Bob Lahita made a compelling argument for Clinton’s health concerns and called for Clinton to be assessed by an impartial panel of physicians during an appearance on Fox Business. Dr. Drew said in an interview with KABC “McIntyre in the Morning” that he’s “gravely concerned” about her health. Suspiciously, that episode has been removed from KABC’s website and Dr. Drew’s show on HLN—owned by a division of Time Warner which is the same parent company that owns CNN—was canceled eight days after he made the negative assessment about Clinton’s health.
On the other hand, CNN attempted to debunk harmful reports about Clinton’s health by suggesting that concerns for the Democratic presidential nominee’s health are both a conspiracy and sexist. And once again, Google has gone out of its way to censor these damaging reports about Clinton. The tech company is suppressing stories about Clinton’s health in its search bar.
When you type in “Hillary Clinton’s he”, the auto-complete suggestions pull results that have nothing to do with the trending issues of Clinton’s personal health, such as “Hillary Clinton’s headquarters” or “Hillary Clinton health plan.”
When the same terms are put into Bing, several suggestions regarding the trending topic of the state of her health appear, such as “Hillary Clinton health issues” and “Hillary Clinton has seizure.”
In Yahoo’s search engine, simply typing “Hillary” pulls up suggestions such as “Hillary Clinton illness,” “Hillary Clinton health issues” and “Hillary Clinton seizure.”
Julian Assange opened a can of worms when he suggested in a recent interview that murdered DNC worker Seth Rich was the Wikileaks source for the DNC hack that resulted in the resignation of three top level officials at the Democratic National Committee. This fueled Clinton body count stories on the Internet that list people tied to the Clintons who have died under freak circumstances.
Google has suppressed these stories in their search engine as reported on Fox News Channel’s Fox & Friends. When you type in “Clinton body,” car repair shop results pop up. The same search terms in Bing and Yahoo pull up results such as “Clinton body count” or “Clinton body bags.” The report also notes that when you type in Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump’s name into Google’s search engine, both positive and negative stories appear.
A report came out Friday revealing that PBS’s “Newshour” removed negative comments about Clinton in Judy Woodruff’s interview with Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein. A Stein supporter discovered the edits after he compared the FaceBook Live version with the broadcast and YouTube versions. The edits PBS removed from the interview included Stein’s criticism of Clinton’s support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Obamacare.
“Newshour” has done one report about the Clinton Foundation scandal in a softball piece titled “A glimpse inside operations at the Clinton Foundation.” In the segment, Woodruff’s co-host Hari Sreenivasan, conducted interviews with James Grimaldi of the Wall Street Journal, Columbia University’s Doug White and Clinton Foundation President Donna Shalala. A Media Research Center study found that the Clinton Foundation “charity fraud” story has only received a total of four minutes and 24 seconds devoted to it from the three big networks this year.
For comparison sake, the incident in which Donald Trump allegedly pretended to be his own publicist—in 1991—garnered eight times more coverage.
To understand why The New York Times, Google, CNN and PBS would censor negative information about Clinton, particularly, stories revolving around the Clinton Foundation scandal, all you have to do is follow the money. All of these companies have donated—in some cases up seven figures—to the Clinton Foundation. Carlos Slim, Chairman & CEO of Telmex, the largest New York Times shareholder, donated between $1 and $5 million. Google donated between $500K and $1 million.
The parent company of CNN, Time Warner Inc., gave between $50k to $100k to the foundation. (Woodruff, who serves as co-host and managing editor of PBS “NewsHour”, gave $250 to the foundation’s Clinton Haiti Relief Fund in 2010.) It’s no wonder these media entities are reluctant to report harmful stories on Clinton, specifically ones surrounding the Clinton Foundation, since in doing so they could be implicating themselves in this evolving scandal.
Her charges of a ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ were false. It was not a conspiracy, and President Clinton’s false statements about his affair lead to his impeachment.
A deeper look into Google’s ties to Clinton, specifically while she was secretary of state, exposes more reasons why the tech giant has a vested interest in censoring the AP’s bombshell story. Wikileaks exposed that Google teamed up with Clinton’s State Department to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al Assad in 2012.
In leaked emails between Clinton’s staff and Google executive Jared Cohen—who worked for Clinton at the State Department before joining Google—Cohen details Google’s plan to get involved in the region and to boost Assad defections. The exchange proves that the tech company worked in concert with the State Department to topple Assad’s government. Further proving Google’s involvement with US foreign policy, Cohen helped draft the State Department’s 21st Century Statecraft Initiative, which called for using Internet and social media technologies to pursue diplomatic goals.
Google’s controversial relationship with Clinton has raised enough eyebrows that the Oracle Corporation is using its resources to launch the Google Transparency Project. The mission is to shed sunlight on Google’s relationships with Clinton and President Barack Obama. The GTP has already produced a series of investigative reports on Google including one that reveals that there were 18 former State Department officials that joined Google as executives and five Google officials who acquired senior positions at the State Department.
Clinton has brushed off reports of her bad health as nothing more than conspiracy theories. In 1998, Clinton used a similar technique to bat down allegations that then President Bill Clinton was involved in an extramarital affair in the White House with intern Monica Lewinsky. We now know that her charges of a “vast right-wing conspiracy” were false. It was not a conspiracy, and President Clinton’s false statements about his affair lead to his impeachment.
Hillary Clinton’s new catch phrase in response to the AP’s explosive report is that there’s “a lot of smoke” but “no fire.” If that’s truly the case, one really has to wonder why there’s an outright refusal to release the rest of her schedule from when she served as Secretary of State until after the November presidential election.