The Skeleton in the Closet of Elaine Pagels: a Real Revelation for New Yorker Magazine | {Measure 144} Missive 45

“…….There are some whose faults do them honor;
           some who virtues disgrace them….”
de la Rochefoucauld
in-perfect-peace
The Advent of the Son of Man,
and the Scholarship of Elaine Pagels
 
  
....In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer...... "  ~Albert Camus

….In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer…… “
~ Albert Camus

 
For that handful of people who have not heard of Elaine Pagels it would be best to start with the facts that she is a world recognized figure in Religion, and an expert in the field of comparative analysis with anciently discovered texts concerning Christianity in particular, someone whose books and pronouncements are treated with almost universal and total respect, and whose authority in matters regarding her own research and opinions about her findings and conclusions to be virtually uncontested.
 
        Her newest book takes itself to the Olympian heights of a Preterist immolation of the Revelation, dispensing with the Revelation of St. John the Divine with her own claim that John the Divine was not John the Apostle, but a disgruntled Jew who made it all up out of his own head, to discredit Christianity itself. But this is Elaine projecting her own ignorance onto the global stage; but now her response hath been sent: with a vengeance from my Father Jesus, of course.
 
      Her book, which is  called “Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation”. was recently reviewed in New Yorker Magazine, in which the reviewer Adam Gopnik then makes light of the entire question by likening the Revelation to a hallucinatory opus full of sound and fury but signifying: nothing.
 
The Darkness and Light to be separated on Judgment Day

The Darkness and Light to be separated on Judgment Day

THE WHITE GODDESS

and Elaine Pagels

 
       That I take issue with Elaine Pagels and her entire analysis of the Revelation is done as a matter of course: as she has absolutely no idea what she is talking about: period. And what is more typically mundane and forgivably astounding; no one has even dared to correct her, because no one has any idea of what the last book in the Bible actually is: The Word of God itself, from beginning to end.
 
This is not surprising, as she is approaching this book in the Bible from the point of view and with the operating modality of a scholar, which, as the Sufis were fond of saying; “….the scholars are entirely mistaken…”, and she is no exception to this blanket summation of those who think they can approach the greatest work of the prophetic consciousness with the yardstick of any literal, historic, political and human perspective about a book in which is revealed, to one who has the Seal:  the Mystery of God itself: Himself.
 
                  The main sticking point is that Elaine Pagels has denied that John the Beloved Disciple wrote the Revelation.   Catholic tradition states that after the Assumption, John went to Ephesus and from there wrote the three epistles traditionally attributed to him. John was allegedly banished by the Roman authorities to the Greek island of Patmos, where some believe that he wrote Book of Revelation.
 
                According to Tertullian (in The Prescription of Heretics) John was banished (presumably to Patmos) after being plunged into boiling oil in Rome and suffering nothing from it. It is said that all who were watching in the entire Colosseum audience were so amazed at this miracle that they all converted to Christianity upon witnessing this miracle on the spot. This is probably the real reason John the Divine was sent out to the barren little island: he was too great a threat to the established order, and  completely demolished the doctrine of the divinity of Ceasar , starting with Domitian who came after Nero, in whose reign John witnessed the destruction of Rome by fire, as seen in Daniel long before.
 
             This event would have occurred during the reign of Domitian, the Roman Emperor who was known for his cruel persecution of Christians in the late 1st century.      
    
              When John was aged, he trained Polycarp, who later became Bishop of Smyrna. This was important because Polycarp was able to carry John’s message to future generations. Polycarp taught Irenaeus, and passed on to him stories about John.  
 
                   According to Irenaeus, Polycarp told the story that John the Divine, in particular, is said to have so detested Cerinthus that he once fled a bathhouse when he found out Cerinthus was inside. This was widely known. Cerinthus was a problem for everyone at the time.
 
               Early Christian tradition describes Cerinthus as a contemporary to and opponent of John the Divine, who may have written the First and Second Epistles of John to specifically warn Christians about his belief system,and address the faithful in respect to doctrine and not just talking about it: but doing it..
 
                   He does warn the less mature in faith and doctrine about the changes he was making to the original gospel..
 
                     One tradition maintains that John wrote his first two epistles to counter Cerinthus’ heresy, and one can see John addresses issue I his first letter seen nowhere else in the New Testament..                
 
                      Cerinthus lived at around 100 CE was an early gnostic and to some, a gainsaying and pseudo-Christian,, who was prominent as a Heresiarch or “arch-heretic” in the view of the early Church Fathers.                
 
                    Contrary to proto-orthodoxy Christianity, Cerinthus’s school followed the Jewish law, used the Gospel according to the Hebrews, denied that the Supreme God had made the physical world, and denied the divinity of my Father Jesus.          
 
                        In Cerinthus’ interpretation, the Christ came to Jesus at baptism, guided him in his ministry, but left him at the  Cross.    
 
                        He taught that Jesus would establish a thousand-year reign of sensuous pleasure after the Second Coming but before the General Resurrection, a view that was declared heretical by the Council of Nicaea.      
 
                       Cerinthus used a version of the gospel of Matthew as scripture.  Furthermore, Cerinthus taught at a time when Christianity’s relation to Judaism and to Greek philosophy had not yet been clearly defined.
 
                     In his association with the Jewish law and his modest assessment of Jesus, he was similar to the Ebionites and to other Jewish Christians.                    
 In defining the world’s creator as the demiurge, he emulated Platonic philosophy and anticipated the Gnostics.

             

Where Can Wisdom be found???

Where Can Wisdom be found???

                    All that is known about Cerinthus comes from the writing of his theological opponents.

                   In “Against Heresies”, Irenaeus relates how Polycarp told a story of John, the disciple of the Lord, going to bathe at Ephesus, and perceiving Cerinthus within, rushed out of the bath-house without bathing, exclaiming,                          

                                       “……..Let us fly, lest even the bath-house fall down, because Cerinthus, the enemy of the truth, is within…”

 
                     It is traditionally believed that John survived his contemporary apostles and lived to an extreme old age, dying naturally at Ephesus in about AD 100.
 
                      Due to the fact that after John was boiled in oil, and then did not die, he was then considered to be someone who was “protected” by some deity or god, thus he was considered to be a danger to the gods, and was then exiled to Patmos to die. But he ended up outliving his captors, and leaving Patmos, and going on to Antioch with the scribe Prochorus.
 
                    Polycarp was among those John mentored and taught, as he lived to be close to 100 years old.
 
                     Apparently Elaine Pagels dismissed Tertullian in his mentions of John the Divine going and then leaving Patmos, or why he was called “the Divine”. In fact he was given that name after Domitian had him boiled in oil; and he emerged unharmed; a sight so incredible and a miracle so great that every soul in the Coliseum converted o the spot. That is why he was exiled to Patmos: and fast….and Irenaeus also mentions his ongoing struggle against Cerinthius, prompting to run out of a bathhouse naked for fear the place would collapse!!!.
 
                     The story is repeated in several places, and by different sources. But corroborating evidence was not good enough for the axe Elain Pagels wanted to grind; so we get a Preterist reduction of the Revelation to a laughable absurdity; which she then ends with her homage to the White Goddess of Robert Graves, as she channels Laura Riding, seemingly after she jumped out the window and hit her head; as Pagels also lost her wits in this reductionist attempt to defame and deny the Revelation of Jesus Christ; whch is the Book of life of the Lamb.
      
                    The Gospel according to John differs considerably from the synoptic gospels, likely written decades earlier than John’s Gospel. The bishops of Asia Minor supposedly requested him to write his Gospel to deal with the heresy of the Ebonite’s, who asserted that Christ did not exist before Mary. The Ebonites also declared the Holy Spirit to be female, like my fallen messenger Sun Myung Moon did much later in the Unification Church. along with the lie that my Father Lord Jesus did not resurrect in his flesh and bone, but was an incorporeal ghost fter his resurrection, flying around like some hapless wayward bat, appearing and then disappearing from locked room due to the fact he was just some kind of celestial spirit. But my Father Jesus had Doubting Thomas disprove that hypothesis for all true believers: Rev. Moon not being one of them, unfortunately for him.
       
                Robert Graves discuses this erroneous belief of the Ebonites in his book “The White Goddess”.
       
              John probably knew and undoubtedly approved of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, but these gospels spoke of Jesus primarily in the year following the imprisonment and death of John the Baptist.
 
            The fact is this:  John after his inhuman torture was quite different from what he was before his ordeal. Thus his name “The Divine”, as it was widely believed the Lord would come to the earth before he died. Curiously I have certain knowledge that this is true, but not in the way people would expect: yet true.
   
               Thus those who translated what he said, and then translated that into the words we find in the Revelation must be seen as the main reason that it appears to be different than both the Gospel of John, and his Three Letters as well. This is because what he told to Prochorus was what he wrote, and prochorus had a very different style of exposition than John. John was used as the source, and both Polycarp and Irenaeus were used  by Pprchorus to make the Revelation into the document it is today. It was written in “pigdin Greek as the vernacular of the day; and John’s Aramaic was not used; but  the Greek of Prochorus, the scribe of John, who attended him from the band of the original 7 Deacons of Pentecost: was…

The Solar Temple.

"Judge not according to the appearence: but judge righteous judgement"
“Judge not according to the appearance: but judge righteous judgment”
What is being said here raises some other questions, but let us look for a moment at Adam and something else;
the Solar System, or House of the Heavens itself.
What is the connection?
There is little doubt that the Solar System resembles nothing else but something very small: the Atom.
So we could look at the Body of Adam as representing a Microcosmic Atom as the Solar System itself:
 
Or Temple.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

==================================

7 Spirits of God  in   7 Lamps      ‘ 7 Days ‘
                    7 Stars               in    7 Heavens   ‘ 7 Worlds ‘              
        7 Angels           in     7 Houses    ‘ 7  Senses ‘

++++++++++++++++++++++++

====================================

Thus the Solar System could then represent the Macrocosmic Body of Adam, seen in it’s ACTUAL unseen or invisible dimensional reality: which means that the Planets in the Solar Atom then symbolize the Organs in the Body of Adam, and the Body of Adam is the Microcosmic Atom itself: in it’s Visible Form of organization.
 
But let us examine another discrepancy in the Darwinian view, but a good indication of what was SUPPOSED to happen in Paradise which would have then become manifest in the 4 Races which seem to have stood for the Four Major Centers of the Body of Adam also, the white race as of the soul of man, the red race for the heart of man, the black race for the mind of man, and the yellow race for the strength of man. The Spirit was thus at the center of the global 4 positions of the 4 Races themselves, one for each corner of North, South, East and West. Thus we have One River, the Intuitional Stream of Mega-Consciousness out of which 4 heads were made, and from which 4 rivers were then made manifest.
 
Thus the 4 Races were the externalized aspect the 4 limbs of the Human Race of which Adam was the Head, as having the Spirit of Man,  of what the 4 rivers represented: namely the 4 Streams of Consciousness for each center or “head” for each river, as the 4 Heads or Fountain of each Body of Water,

Representation of the Original Design of Providence

_________________________________________________________

“A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and there it divided and became four rivers.
This represented the Intuitional Stream of Mega-consciousness, whose Fountain was then the 7 Fold Spirit of Holiness.
____________________________________________
The name of the first is the Pishon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. And the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. The name of the second river is the Gihon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Cush. And the name of the third river is the Tigris, which flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.”
_____________________________________________
Thus the Soul as the Fountain of the First River the Pishon as Volitional Stream of Consciousness, the Heart as the Fountain of the Emotional Stream of Consciousness or Second River of Paradise called Gihon, the Mind as the Fountain for the Third River the Tigris, as the Rational Stream of Consciousness, and the Strength as the Fountain of the Fourth River the Euphrates, as the Inspirational Stream of Consciousness.
 
But let us return to the topic of the 4 races on the earth while Adam was then created.
 
According to Genesis he was taken from “the dust of the earth”,
which some interpret to mean that Adam was made of the existent stock of the races that were on earth already,
which God “ennobled” by breathing His Breath into him.
It’s close, but it’s wrong
 
Adam was completely above the entire threshold of what had ever existed before: his nature was Angelic, and he communed with the Angels daily. Eve was his origin and looked just like an angel only without a penis, and Adam was incomparably handsome, which is why the Archangel, as firstborn, was jealous of him, this being the origin of Cain’s hatred of Abel.
 
Adam was of God’s Direct Lineage as the Image of God, and Eve represented the Mirror of Creation.
 
You believe differently, but I had to tell you what I know.
 
Here is some background on what happened because of the Fall, but what was made manifest regardless because of the fact that Adam fell as still good up to that point and was “Good”, and Eve who tempted him in the position of the Serpent was Evil, thus their united body represented “Good and Evil” itself. This is what God was trying to avoid, a discarnate body being made.
 
Rev. Moon says Eve represented “the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” but he’s wrong, Adam was told to stay away from that Tree by the Commandment before EVE was EVER created. The Fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was the head of the phallus of the Archangel, and the Fruit of the Tree of Life was the head of the phallus of Adam.
 
The Archangel knew what good and evil were: Adam did not. The serpent who was the tempter was created along with the Commandment was therefore “the angel of the Devil”, for to grow it thus meant Adam had to overcome the temptation.
No equality with the angels was possible without Adam attaining the Victory, No overcoming meant Adam would never stand in his position in the eyes of the Angels, who God created first, and for a reason.. God Himself could not give man equality with the angels; it had to be EARNED, that Adam would be considered equal to the angels in their eyes as well.
 
Just so you know. My overcoming in my 3 Temptations in that 40 days spanning December 2008 to January 2009 is how Hyo Jin Moon came to me, and ministered to me in Bay City, as the angels did when my Father Jesus overcame; which is a little different than those who claim to have seen or talked with Hyo Jin: he was there when we wrote that song I told Kyle Toffey about.
            The Fruit   of the Tree       of the   Knowledge of   Good and Evil  is the      Fruit
   or Essence of the Nature of the    Principle of    Light and Darkness:   
which is “Duality”
The Fruit or “Essence” of the Tree of Life
is “Unity”.     
===============================================
That is why the “two become one flesh”, and thus having “one name”,
as God called Adam and Eve by their complete name as afterward being called “Adam”.
 
Just so you know: but ye you are under no obligation to believe the truth, however. But what was planted in the Garden?
 

But here’s some facts:

“…..Let us begin with the enigma of the modern corn plant.
 
 The humble origin of corn remains mysterious because the ancestral wild plant has never been located.
 
It is an established, scientific fact that corn is a cultigen, a plant engineered by humans. This means that it has become so altered by humans that it cannot reproduce naturally and is entirely dependent upon man’s continued cultivation. In short, it is now a manmade plant and has been for some time.
 
 Scientists have not been able to trace the lineage of corn to the ancestral wild plant.
 
How can this be if the ‘agricultural revolution’ only occurred 7-8,000 years ago?
 
Corn is a form of wild grass, as are the majority of the other major crop plants, there is no good reason for the ancestral variety to have vanished and/or become extinct. 10,000 years may seem like a long time in human terms yet it is a very short time in terms of the evolution and life span of a plant species. There are ancient plants that have existed continuously for hundreds of millions of years.
 
If you believe that our ancestors domesticated crop plants, you have to start by assuming that people without any agricultural experience were brilliant enough to select and breed the best wild seed candidates to turn into major cereal crops.
 
It is a historical fact that in spite of 5,000 years of continuous agricultural development we have not genetically bred a new major crop from a wild species. Just how ingenious were out Stone Age predecessors who performed this agronomic feat without any agricultural or genetic knowledge?
 
Basing the agricultural revolution on the notion that people who lacked any understanding of the scientific basis of plant breeding created seems a very shaky premise. Skepticism is warranted due to the fact that, if it actually occurred, this was the riskiest of gambles, since it represented a complete departure from the only way of life and only food sources that Stone Age people knew.
 
But first let’s step back to an earlier point and ask how we know that 100,000 generations of Stone Age humans did not eat wild grass seeds. Our guts are still not adapted to digest uncooked grains. After all we are not birds.
================================================
In addition our Paleolithic ancestors lacked the technology to harvest, process and cook wild grass seeds
 
============================================== 
 
The seeds of wild species are miniscule and they are attached to the seed heads making them difficult to harvest and hardly worth the effort.
 
These are little known facts that raise deeper issues.
 
Our hunter-gatherer ancestors mainly subsisted on leafy greens and lean muscle meats. If they lacked an extended experience with wild grasses how did they know which ones to select to turn into wheat, rye, corn, barley and rice?
 
 In other words these are still the principal food crops that our civilizations are based upon. After at least 5,000 years of continuous agriculture we do not seem to have improved upon the first selections of our ‘scientifically ignorant’ ancestors.
 
That hardly seems logical.
 
 
This amazingly prescient selection of wild seeds seems not only more than a little surprising it looks to border on being a minor miracle. There are an estimated 195,000 flowering plants that they could have turned into food sources and primitive man chose less than .01 to base agriculture upon. This happened at a point in time when people had no concept of domesticating plants or animals, which means no experience with artificial selection.
 
To further appreciate the paradox that this situation imposes upon us we have to understand, domesticated crop plants are nothing like their wild ancestors. Farmers have long known this fact. The differences are so great that most of the specific ancestral locations of our cereal crops remain a mystery. We must ponder what this really means.
 
What are the implications of our scientists not being able to trace the specific wild ancestors of modern corn, wheat, rye, barely and rice?
 
When we look at the problem of how our ancestors, lacking in both tools and knowledge, domesticated wild plants it is really tantamount to pondering how the Great Pyramid was conceived, designed, engineered and constructed with stone tools and primitive methods. There is something out of focus in the picture we have of the history of civilization on this planet, how and when agriculture and precision-engineered architecture were developed and by whom.
 
It is as if our ancestors were gathered around the campfire inside a cave and one was using his hands and fingers to tell stories by throwing shadows against the wall one minute; the next minute they are watching satellite TV and giddily channel surfing.
That is how great the gaps are between the late Stone Age and the birth of agriculture and civilization. 
 
How were these quantum leaps made and where is the evidence to support the orthodox theory that humans engineered them?
 
The real problem with the orthodox scenario is the lack of a long incubation period during which early humans experimented with selective breeding and with constructing megalithic stone monuments. Agriculture should — and not doubt actually does– extend back tens of thousands of years and not the 9,000 that modern science contends. The creation of dogs from wild wolves, a true genetic engineering feat, is proof of this…..”
EVITERNITY: the Dawn of Eternity

EVITERNITY: the Dawn of Eternity

This should give you some idea of what “happened” when Adam and Eve were tossed out of Paradise: the Creation they made when Adam lost his seed was not in the classic sexual act; it was an act repeating the act of what the serpent showed Eve: not sex in the traditional sense. As John told me, they were close when Eve lowered her head and began to do what she had done with the head of the serpent with the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, which was the creature that symbolized what was the soft phallus of the Archangel. The hard phallus was thus of the Tree of Life, the phallus of Adam. But it could only be raised if Adam was in the holy Spirit.
 
Eve had already lost her “light” as the Aura she had was that of the Light of the Moon which represented the virginity of Eve. She came to Adam in the Day. When he lost HIS light, as the Aura he had represented the Light of the Sun as the Virginity of Adam is when he knew he had sinned.:
 
First Adam lost his Light. He went from golden to dull pale urine yellow color. This was Instinctual loss of Face, which had sent out actual rays before.
 
Thus this became the fall of the Yellow Race, which became pale, and not fully golden as they were originally. Adam was then closer in appearance to the Yellow race above the other 3 Primal Races, and the yellow virgin was really closest to Eve in her fall as well.
This is why the woman died who Rev. Moon made love to that three times in those three hours in the P’ikareun ceremony Glenn Emery and Gordon Ross knew about. Gordon Ross drove Rev. Moon to all 48 states in that Plymouth Fury back in 1965. She who initiated Rev. Moon in the “Inside the Belly Church” actually WAS: “Eve”, symbolically but yet: in a very substantial way.
 
Secondly Adam became white as a ghost: because he had broken the Covenant of his Promise to God. Thus he had lost the Word as His Seed. This was the Fall for the White Race, that of Instinctual Fear
 
Thirdly he became ashamed, blushing incredibly, and ran and hid from Eve, thus we had the fall of the Red Race: as that of Instinctual Guilt.
 
Fourthly he and then Eve, who rejoined him, sewed fig leaves together to cover their sexual parts. This was the fall of the Black Race, as that of Instinctual Veiling.
 
Thus every church with a man on a cross, with a loin cloth, is re-presenting the Fig Leaf and reenacting the Fall, as of the Image of the Beast,
a false Christ, as the fallen image of God.
 
My Father Jesus was naked on that Cross, his one piece white garment, that the Roman soldiers cast lots to see who would get it, was all he ever wore 
 
Adam and Eve were then too terrified to respond when Gabriel, the Voice of God, was walking and singing in the Garden. Gabriel realized something was wrong when he saw them hiding. Thus they went from black to almost blue and then purple because they literally held their breath.
 
So; now you know. When Adam and Eve came out of Paradise God cursed the ground so that Adam and Eve would have the exact mirror and image of what they done in their fallen act; a World of creation that was half-good, as from Adam and half-evil, as from Eve. So what we have is two alternate 4 dimensional universes trapped together in One Discarnate Dimension. Thus we have a universe of good where we can do good, and then the bad one where people get murdered; the one Cain made manifest.
 
But the 4 Races then met, over time, the goddess: Eve, called Ceres, for Cereal. Adam died after 930 years. There is no record of Eve ever dying. Why? Because she is ISIS, the Fallen Nature of the Earth incarnate, and Cain, when born, she said “I have gotten my ( ‘a MAN’ ) from the LORD”. Cain is then Osiris, the god of Death, the husband of ISIS. That is why in Egypt the Pharaoh always married his sister, to honor the incestual ancestual origin.
 
Her full title is “The fallen mother of all living in the valley of the shadow of Death”, that valley being the one between her legs. All who go there produce food for the serpent, her first lover; as dust for the serpent to eat.
 
As a further aside the dragon was created when the Serpent tried to stand on principle when trying to defend his act of breaking the Truce on the Sabbath when God was resting and had left the Archangel in charge until he came back. God cut off his leg. That is why he had to go on his belly. When he grabbed the planet Jupiter as the one that is over the organ of the Liver, which is the only regenerative organ left in the body, he grew his leg back, but still walks with a limp.
 
Ah yes.
 
Now let us see where Darwin himself gave up trying to explain how man went from primitive hunter-gatherer
to a state of an advanced Civilization,
comparatively, in a few generations.
This is by the scientist Francis Crick.

—————————————————————-

“….Francis Crick, 1981, pg. 117]
 
This may seem a wide departure from the mainstream for a man who is credited with being the co-discoverer of the shape of the DNA molecule, however Crick’s treatment of this topic was mostly from a rigorous, scientific perspective. He did not delve into history’s mysteries but into a variety of scientific topics including the nature of DNA and RNA as well as what was then known about when life originated on earth. “The earliest traces of life we can detect at the present time are found associated with rocks dated to about 3.6 billion yeas ago…but the fossil record, formed by simple animals whose hard parts have been preserved, is only 0.6 billion years old.” (1)
 
In his book Crick pointed out that it took the simplest, single cell organisms about 1.4 billion years to evolve. The next decisive step up in complexity to multicellular organisms took almost 2 billion years more. Mammals appeared on the scene about 200 million years ago and complexity took a quantum leap. It would seem that the process of biological evolution on the earth is counter-intuitive….”
 
Now let us look a little deeper at the flaws Darwin himself admitted. But let us see where he agrees with Darwin first.
 
“….We would expect that it should have taken a shorter time period for the simplest life forms to evolve and much longer for the most complex organisms yet mammals took only a fraction of the time to develop compared to the earliest and simplest organisms.
 
We have to keep in mind that the book was published more than 20 years ago, decades before the Human Genome Project (HGP) finished decoding the DNA blueprint. However, at the time one of the central mysteries that puzzled Crick was “Such an astonishing degree of uniformity was hardly suspected as little as forty years ago.” (2) He was referring to findings that showed that all living things use the same four-letter DNA language to transmit genetic information. This seemed to point to the probability that all life on earth arose from one very primitive population, which developed the singular, genetic code.
 
At that time it was believed that the human gene count, and that of other higher animals, would naturally be greater than the lower plant and animal species. It was also assumed that humans had branched of from the great apes but no one specifically singled out the chimp. Both of those assumptions were based upon a Darwinian view. However, the HGP and other more recent studies have shown those predictions were incorrect.
 
The human gene count turned out to be less than the rice genome and only double that of the lowly roundworm and Homo sapiens DNA is 98.5 percent the same as the chimpanzee. These results surprised and mystified mainstream scientists.
 
The HGP did confirm that all of life is very closely related on the genetic level and we can accurately refer to earth’s biological system as the ‘Genetic Tree of Life’.
 
 Crick alluded to the underlying issue raised by this finding with the following statement:
 
 “We see, then, that one way to approach the origin of life is to try to imagine how this remarkable uniformity first arose.”
 
(3) The question is how could the primordial earth have randomly synthesized the first nucleic acids or proteins from the chemical soup that existed billions of years ago?
 
 It might appear that the recent genetic findings support Darwinism, the theory that life originated on earth through blind chance. On the surface it would seem that the very uniformity that the genetic code displays argues for life originating on this planet on its own.
 
 However, that is not necessarily the case; the scenario poses problems. For starters, if Nature was operating via a long series of random events that eventually clicked and produced simple one-celled organisms, why weren’t there a variety of these random combinations that resulted in numerous DNA codes instead of a single branching genetic tree?
Now let us see where Darwin himself gave up trying to explain how man went from primitive hunter-gatherer to a state of an advanced Civilization, comparatively, in a few generations. This is by the scientist Francis Crick.D

“….Francis Crick, 1981, pg. 117]
 
This may seem a wide departure from the mainstream for a man who is credited with being the co-discoverer of the shape of the DNA molecule, however Crick’s treatment of this topic was mostly from a rigorous, scientific perspective. He did not delve into history’s mysteries but into a variety of scientific topics including the nature of DNA and RNA as well as what was then known about when life originated on earth. “The earliest traces of life we can detect at the present time are found associated with rocks dated to about 3.6 billion yeas ago…but the fossil record, formed by simple animals whose hard parts have been preserved, is only 0.6 billion years old.” (1)
 
In his book Crick pointed out that it took the simplest, single cell organisms about 1.4 billion years to evolve. The next decisive step up in complexity to multicellular organisms took almost 2 billion years more. Mammals appeared on the scene about 200 million years ago and complexity took a quantum leap. It would seem that the process of biological evolution on the earth is counter-intuitive….”
 

Now let us look a little deeper at the flaws Darwin himself admitted. But let us see where he agrees with Darwin first.

 
“….We would expect that it should have taken a shorter time period for the simplest life forms to evolve and much longer for the most complex organisms yet mammals took only a fraction of the time to develop compared to the earliest and simplest organisms.
 
We have to keep in mind that the book was published more than 20 years ago, decades before the Human Genome Project (HGP) finished decoding the DNA blueprint. However, at the time one of the central mysteries that puzzled Crick was “Such an astonishing degree of uniformity was hardly suspected as little as forty years ago.” (2) He was referring to findings that showed that all living things use the same four-letter DNA language to transmit genetic information. This seemed to point to the probability that all life on earth arose from one very primitive population, which developed the singular, genetic code.
 
At that time it was believed that the human gene count, and that of other higher animals, would naturally be greater than the lower plant and animal species. It was also assumed that humans had branched of from the great apes but no one specifically singled out the chimp. Both of those assumptions were based upon a Darwinian view. However, the HGP and other more recent studies have shown those predictions were incorrect.
 
The human gene count turned out to be less than the rice genome and only double that of the lowly roundworm and Homo sapiens DNA is 98.5 percent the same as the chimpanzee. These results surprised and mystified mainstream scientists.
 
The HGP did confirm that all of life is very closely related on the genetic level and we can accurately refer to earth’s biological system as the ‘Genetic Tree of Life’.
 
 Crick alluded to the underlying issue raised by this finding with the following statement:
 
 “We see, then, that one way to approach the origin of life is to try to imagine how this remarkable uniformity first arose.”
 
(3) The question is how could the primordial earth have randomly synthesized the first nucleic acids or proteins from the chemical soup that existed billions of years ago?
 
 It might appear that the recent genetic findings support Darwinism, the theory that life originated on earth through blind chance. On the surface it would seem that the very uniformity that the genetic code displays argues for life originating on this planet on its own.
 
 However, that is not necessarily the case; the scenario poses problems. For starters, if Nature was operating via a long series of random events that eventually clicked and produced simple one-celled organisms, why weren’t there a variety of these random combinations that resulted in numerous DNA codes instead of a single branching genetic tree?……..
 
The problem is that even though we have almost 90 per cent of the DNA of a chimp is that humans don’t look like them  Let us take a look at George Raft in a three-piece suit.
 
Doesn’t look much like a chimpanzee. But at least you don’t think nature did it all by blind chance like the Marxists and staunch atheists.
 

Let’s look at the findings of Crick, to wit;

 

“……It can be argued that the very uniformity of the genetic language seems to imply that this process had been tested and packaged before on some other planet and then transplanted to the earth.
 
The one-pass-through success of life on our planet would seem to indicate that a high degree of intelligence and bio-engineering was involved because whoever conducted it bet everything on one roll of the dice, a single genetic pathway as if on a sure thing. A purely random process should have produced at least several genetic lines with varying bases and languages in order to insure that one would succeed….’
 
Crick later posed the following question:
“…… Can we marshal any convincing evidence which might support or refute Directed Panspermia? One possible line of evidence is contained within the organisms we have today. In spite of the great variety of molecules and chemical reactions produced by evolution, there are certain features, which appear common to all living things. We can begin to piece together the family trees of certain molecules – transfer RNA molecules, for example -…the one feature, which is so invariant that it immediately attracts attention. This is the genetic code…
 
This would not be surprising if there were an obvious structural reason for the details of the code; if certain amino acids had necessarily to go with certain codons because, for example, their shapes neatly fitted together. It seems most improbable…that all the details of the code were decided by purely chemical reasons…One is mildly surprised that several versions of the code did not emerge.”

This is a telling observation. Then he says this;

“……(4)  He later summed up his interpretation of the evidence:
 
….. “The fact that the code is so uniform lends a small measure of support for Directed Panspermia.”
 
(5) Crick also pointed to the element molybdenum, which is more abundant in living things than it is in rocks, as another support for extraterrestrial intervention. Stronger evidence in support for Directed Panspermia came in the fossil record.
 
According to Crick his theory predicted that microorganisms should appear suddenly, “without any evidence of prebiotic systems or very primitive organisms.”
 
(6) This, in fact, is what the fossil record shows and we would suspect if an advanced civilization had suddenly decided it was time to ‘seed’ the earth.
 
Directed Panspermia offers a better explanation for the gaps in the fossil record since ‘missing links’ could have existed solely on the ‘sender’ planet and never on earth.
 
Darwinism is actually crushed by the ‘missing links’ problem.
 
 Crick raised another very good point about the sudden emergence of a type of blue-green algae dated to a very early time in the life of the earth. The problem for mainstream evolutionists is explaining how this primitive plant evolved to a fully formed stage so quickly.
 
This would suggest that the plant went through an earlier evolution on a planet similar to earth and was transplanted here by a technically advanced civilization.
 
Crick’s theory could also explain the abrupt appearance of flowering plants (angiosperms) and the lack of transitional species in the fossil record between the primitive non-flowering plants (gymnosperms) and the angiosperms.

Darwin referred to this gap as the “abominable problem”.

 
 From the above we can see that the mechanisms of Directed Panspermia pass some basic scientific criteria in several regards, the available evidence conforms to its predictions and it appears to explain some phenomena better than currently accepted theories…..
Behold! The Tabernacle of God!
Behold! The Tabernacle of God!
 I am not one who holds with an alien race coming here to begin life as does classic panspermic theory, as with Von Daniken’s “Chariot of the Gods” scenarios. But the ”abominable problem” of Darwin’s theory, is precisely because what Adam and Eve were to have done was to have catapulted the 4 Primal races into “a great evolutionary jump ahead”, into what would have been very advanced technologically, and far superior to even what we have now, not the brutal world we had before the last 500 years of discovery as our divine nature began to reappear.
 
As you may recall, in heaven one can manifest almost anything just by thinking of it, as the angels do.
 
We are far from that here, but it was where we should have been after only 21 years, in a time continuum in nearby Eden where we were under a specific Commandment of the Garden,  so we would not make a mistake and leave Eternity as God’s Presence, while we were still able to be tempted, and get “stuck” there; but that’s exactly what occurred.
 
We did not pass the “test”, even though it happened cause the serpent broke the truce on the Sabbath, and did not wait until God had returned as he had promised. So let’s look at what you said, to wit;
 
God told them that the day they ate of the tree, they would die. They ate but did not die. Their death was metaphorical, spiritual.

 
These stories were written, supposedly by Moses, 4,000 years ago. Metaphor, symbols and parables were widely used to convey lessons. Jesus taught with parables.
 
 
 
But this is not what had really been the case, as what God told Adam was not a parable or metaphor: it was a dire promise: period.
 
The problem is that Adam had not exactly broken the commandment in the way God had said 
 
What he had done was “spilled” a little amount of seed by accident.
 
About a third of what he had, actually.
 
But the Archangel didn’t want to take the chance of letting Azrael kill Adam for breaking the Covenant for just a third of the seed; and being scared of making a mistake, he “stopped” everything from happening: by invoking the Power of God. He commanded Azrael to spare Adam.
 
Thus the Fall also involved the flawed judgment of the Archangel in charge  as well, Archangel stopped Azrael from killing Adam on the spot by exercising “the Mercy of God“, which he could do because he was in charge on the Throne.
 
Normally only God could have exercised this option.
 
This is where we get the origin of the Devil claiming to be the ‘father of mankind’: by exercising this act of Mercy was really due to his confusion in the face of some situation he was caught off guard by. Eve was still a virgin: a satanic virgin, actually, but Adam had the responsibility as God gave him the Word directly, which Adam had given Eve, but then and then he also added “neither touch it”, which was then “the Law.” as an extra addition to God’s word.
 
So his temporary solution was to hit the “panic button” to stop Azrael the Angel of Death from killing Adam, which he could do while sitting on the Throne; as “God”
 
 And this was false mercy, and the “thunderbolt” of Zeus/ Azazyel as the “fallen Strength of God’ was that he NULLIFIED the WORD OF GOD thereby, when God said “the day thou eatest thou will surely die”. SURELY. But now: it hadn’t happened. THIS was the disaster.
 
THIS is why the serpent said to EVE when he tempted her: ”…..You won’t die…”.because he knew that touching it would not kill Eve, as Adam had said to her.
 
 So when she touched it and didn’t die she then did not really  believe anything Adam had told her.
 
This was the mistake of Adam the serpent took advantage of. What he added to the Word of God was actually not true…it was really due to Adam loving Eve a little TOO much by “adding” the “extra insurance” of telling her to “not even touch the phallus” or she would die, so she would be safe.
 
But this was really the major problem of adding something to the Word that is not absolutely true, that the serpent then took inmmediate advantage of when he betrayed God by breaking the Sabbath before God returned..
 
Because he also knew the Archangel wanted Adams position, and the serpent wanted Adam’s wife Eve for himself, as he represented the creature who symbolized the phallus of the Archangel, who really was jealous of Adam.
 
Thus the Archangel was also being tested and tempted by God when He put him on the Throne, and vanished on the Sabbath for His “Day of Rest.”
 
This has not been known”.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s