Revealing the Unknown Reality of Rev. Moon’s Role in the Revelation
The 7 Sealed Thunders;
The Unsealed Voices of the 7 Thunders of Rev. Moon;
the Real Mission of my Servant John and the Restored “Divine Principle”
The Central Figures of the Two Global Missionbearers
Karol Wojytla / ( Pope John Paul II ) and Mun Yong-myeong / ( Sun Myung Moon )
Few indeed are aware that Rev. Moon was the central figure in place for the providence, in these; the Last Days; until his death after I revealed the Antichrist with the Last Day having come into view as Osama was revealed in his position ( seen at II Thessalonians 2;2-6 ) with the proof of my assertion seen in the revealing of the “Man of Lawlessness” as Osama bin Laden as the Global Terrorist, standing as the Cosmic Balaam, Son of Perdition.
Barack Hussein the Blessed, killing the Antichrist or “Masih ad-Dajjal“,
thus stood as the Cosmic Mahdi, the Savior of Islam.
Osama lived by the Sword: and died by it, as my Father said of him, and all the rest of the blind, brother-hating lovers of darkness who followed and set the Cosmic Foundation of Darkness; Al-Qaeda itself, and the MYSTERY of ISIS the Whore is the VEIL of Babylon the Great.
Rev. Moon never even noticed when Louis Farrakhan, who was proudly responsible for the murder of Malcolm X, eulogized Osama bin Laden at the Million Man March…( Farrakhan used to say of Malcolm X “…We gave him life, and we took away that life…” ),saying he was an innocent “victim” of American persecution!!!
Thus Rev. Moon allowed the Thief to break into his house: hosting a murderer who said the Antichrist Osama bin Laden, the Global Terrorist, the Son of Perdition as the Fatted Calf seen killed when the Prodigal Son returns was “…….unfairly misjudged….” !!!!
Thus did the leadership of the UC embrace the Black Muslim’s false prophet and glorifier of the Son of Perdition, the Masih ad-Dajjal of Islam, the Antichrist of Christianity. And Elijah Muhammad of the Black Muslims was a false Mahdi, indeed.
Few in the elect position of the Korean of the Unification Church are actually aware of this development, because it really could only be seen in the relation of my servant John the Divine to that of completing the mission of the Messenger, which was voided by John the Baptist’s new body ( Rev. Moon ) when he left his position.
With the death of the Islamic figure the “Masih ad-Dajjal the Accursed” by the intrepid actions of “Barack Hussein Obama the Blessed” I hope to cast some light on Rev. Moon’s true part in this fiasco and his flawed contribution to the Foundation to Receive the Messiah at the Cosmic Level, which I reveal in the overall Design of Providence; where I show as certain proof of his identity exactly where he appears in the Gospel of Christ seen with Luke and Matthew, and here in chapter 10 of the Revelation of Christ as well, although not understood by anyone on earth except a few of my associates: yet still they who I have shown these things can see them as an unalterable sign of the Hand of God moving the Providence forward, and that Rev. Moon was the one who was destined to publish the Providence of Restoration, first heard in the Seven Thunders and their 7 Voices, which is why after hearing them John was told not to write down what he heard, and then furthermore then told to “set a seal” upon.
Sealed with what??? I have the answer to that question,
from Chapter 10 of the Revelation
…And I saw another ‘MIGHTY ANGEL‘ come down from Heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a Rainbow was upon His head, and His face was as it were the Sun, and His feet as Pillars of Fire: and He had in His hand a ‘LITTLE BOOK’ open: and He set His right foot on the SEA, and His left foot on the EARTH, and cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when He had cried ‘SEVEN THUNDERS‘ uttered their voices. And when the ‘SEVEN THUNDERS‘ had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from Heaven saying unto me,
“…. Seal up those things
which the seven thunders uttered,
and write them not …..”
The story begins with Rev. Moon in Korea sitting at the feet of his scholarly genius of a friend Baek Kim Moon, as he was the figure who unsealed what had been Sealed by John the Divine on Patmos….and which Rev. Moon published in America in 1973 after finding that Baek Kim had “unsealed” these seven thunders which had concealed the 7 levels of the Providence of Salvation 2,000 years later……and for which my Father Jesus called Baek Kim Moon by a name not heard in many a moon: “Israel”.
Rev. Moon was indeed a genius of another stripe, as his talent was in putting together and correlating transmitted material by all the various saintly and prophetic men and women, whose contributions he assembled into one document, which alone is a testament to attest to his talent of taking all these differing transmissions from all of these spiritually blessed and sacrificial figures in Korea and making them all hang together thematically; as there is no doubt in my mind that he indeed knew these scattered bits brought into one book were going to be of incalculable worth.
The problems began when he tried to “skew” the knowledge to support his claim of being the Messiah….with no Elijah first to proclaim his mission. Bo Hui Pak was the head of the KCIA, but he definitely wasn’t John the Baptist.
Rev. Moon’s real contribution was to assemble all these revelations he had collected into one methodically written and simply argued position of Korea as the Chosen Nation where the Messiah had now originated, which he did begin to tell all who would listen, and declare globally his advent not many years after he was saved from death, providentially; by American troops coming into Korea at Inchon, arriving at the slave labor camp that the guards abandoned in the nick of time, coming just one day before he was to be executed!!! But he never thanked my Father Jesus for sending Douglas MacArthur to save him.
The real story is how and especially why this happened…..but the answer lies in the Restoration of the Messenger John the Baptist, a mission which Rev. Moon was supposed to have done first in the restoration of all things: beginning the “Providence for the Start” correctly as first admitting he was John’s new body; even as John had been Elijah’s new body. Nothing could fundamentally progress until this was done. But it was never done; so there was no restoration, because John’s failure had to be restored first by Rev. Moon. But he never did, instead saying America’s role was to testify to him as the Messiah.
But without Elijah being restored first: and substantially, this was proved to be impossible. Thus all seemed lost until Glenn David Emery and I both independently arrived at the truth of who Rev. Moon was and what his real position had been: at which point my Father Jesus brought us together, as Glenn simply googled “Rev. Moon was John the Baptist“, an act which brought him immediately to my blog.
1: And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
2: And he had in his hand a little book open : and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
3: And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth : and when he had cried , seven thunders uttered their voices.
4: And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write : and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me,
“….Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not…..”
And why was John not to be allowed to write down the 7 voices of the 7 thunders??? Because that was for someone else to reveal, namely; Reverend Sun Myung Moon, as his portion of responsibility in restoring the position of Elijah held by John the Baptist. Elijah was the Day Star ( seen as John: the Baptist ), of the Sun of Righteousness ( seen as Jesus: the Son of Man), seen as the two positions of Messenger and Messiah first shown by Malachi, and later restored by the Ascending Angel of Maitreya: Philip Sobul Love.
Philip came to this position after being given the Seal of Jehovah, and in which I initiated him into the Seal of the Living God about Mary and Jehovah, as the Holy Spirit of God seen by John in the form of the Dove, as that Sign he was given about the Messiah being the one on whom the Dove would STAY at the Baptism.
This Divine Celestial Male Dove as “Jah” was that same one which united with Mary when she was transformed into the form of a Dove as ‘Zion”. Thus Jah was later seen by John as he came down on my Father at the Jordan, in my Father’s Baptism unto his Death.
This was all revealed to me by the Angel in 1986 in the House of Ruth, my grandmother; the Owl of Athena known as Sophia; as concerning the restoring and reversing of the mistakes the Unification Church made following Rev. Moon, who also repeated the exact pattern of the fall of John the Baptist quite tragically, and thus being “cut asunder” even as John was.
The Mystery of God is thus how that holy thing the Lamb was created by God, to become the Son of the God; which Philip Love then restored after having tied on the Khata of World Renunciation and Eternal Chastity, then Ascending to finally reach his position of understanding as “…an Angel standing in the Sun…”, written of in Revelation 19:17, and even now inviting all humanity to partake of the Supper of the Great God.
“…a small one shall became a strong nation…”
….That nation which was South Korea…
Few in America or the World know that Rev. Moon came to America in 1965 as
St. John reborn, carrying out the Third Advent of Elijah …..
Rev. Moon and the First Sealed Thunder:
The First Voice Unsealed: the Failure of the Providence of Restoration centering on Adam’s Family:
( Seen on pages 250-1 of the Divine Principle, concerning the providential understanding about Adam’s failure. )
Looking at the lessons learned from Adam’s family we are face to face with the First Failure of the providence with Adam, and the progression of his division into Cain and Abel as the separation by God of the Origin, to indemnify the Fall, which produced the mission of the first lord of the Restoration unknown by Rev. Moon as the figure he mentions only once: Seth, who I found out later is the prototype of the Son of Man, which means “Son of Adam”. This is because Seth was created “…in the original likeness and image of Adam…” who was the Image of God, even as Eve represented the Mirror of Creation.
It was this Failure with Adam and his division into two bodies that Rev. Moon explained in his book that is “the First Voice of the First Thunder“: Unsealed. This is because the 7 Voices of the 7 Sealed Thunders of John were of the 7 Failures of the 7 lords of Restoration in the 7 Levels of the Providence of Salvation, starting from the first or Individual Level, and going all the way up to the 7th or Cosmic and Universal Level, which is that of the Kingdom of Heaven and Earth.
Rev. Moon considered my Father Jesus a failure and was ashamed of him and his sayings, and in the later years of his life called him a “bastard” and honored him not at all, and even suggested others treat him disrespectfully as well; namely because Moon believed the Lie of Satan, as John the Baptist also did. It is tragic that that very Lie that Satan whispered into John’s ear was that one Rev. Moon swallowed whole; the Accusation of the Devil that my Father Jesus was created by Mary in an act of Adultery with Zacharias, John’s own father.
This killed John spiritually by defiling him, as it did to Rev. Moon later as well. But it proves that John the Baptist and Rev. Moon were “one and the same”, spiritually.
This First Thunder can be found in the book ”Divine Principle” ,
on pages 239 to 250
Baek Kim Moon, who said he met my Father Jesus in 1946 on Gansan Mountain
….and was given the title of “Israel”
( DIVINE PRINCIPLE
PROVIDENTIAL AGE FOR THE FOUNDATION OF RESTORATION )
SECTION I –
THE PROVIDENCE OF RESTORATION CENTERING ON ADAM’S FAMILY
We have discussed (cf. Part I, Ch. 3, Sec. II, 1–103) the fact that God has been working to save fallen men, though the human fall was brought about by man’s own failure. God’s providence to restore fallen men by having them lay the foundation to receive the Messiah began with Adam’s family.
As discussed in the “Introduction”, Adam, due to his blood relationship with Satan, was placed in the midway position where he could deal with either God or Satan. Therefore, in order that fallen man of the midway position might be separated and shifted from Satan to the Heavenly side to lay the foundation to receive the Messiah, he must himself set up certain conditions of indemnity. Consequently, Adam’s family should have set up the condition of indemnity to restore the foundation of faith and the foundation of substance (incarnation), and, on the foundation to receive the Messiah automatically laid by the previous two, should have finally received the Messiah before the providence of restoration could be realized.
1. THE FOUNDATION OF FAITH
First, in order that the foundation of faith may be laid, there must be certain conditional objects as the price of restoring it through indemnity. Originally, Adam, due to his disbelief, lost God’s Word given as the condition to lay the foundation of faith. Consequently, in order for Adam, who fell into a position where he was unable to receive God’s Word directly, to restore the foundation of faith, he should have set forth certain conditional objects acceptable to God’s will in place of the Word, with an absolute faith. This conditional object to be set forth in Adam’s family in place of the Word was the offering.
Second, there must be a central figure to restore the foundation of faith before laying the foundation at all. The central figure to restore the foundation of faith in Adam’s family was, of course, Adam himself. Therefore, it was natural for Adam to offer the sacrifices. His doing so acceptably or not could decide the success or failure of laying the foundation of faith.
The Biblical record shows that Adam could not offer the sacrifices, but, instead, Cain and Abel did this. What must have been the reason? According to the principle of creation, man was originally created to deal with only one master. Therefore, God cannot work His providence in the principle of creation with any being that is in the position to deal with two masters. If God should accept Adam and his offering, Satan would also try to deal with them on the basis of his having a blood relationship with Adam. In that case, Adam would be placed in the non-principled position to have to deal with two masters, God and Satan. God, not being able to work such a non-principled providence, had to conduct the providence of dividing Adam, the origin of the two characters of good and evil, into two beings; namely, the being representing good character and the being representing evil character. For this purpose, God gave Adam two sons, respectively representing good and evil. He had each offer sacrifices by setting them in the respective positions to deal either with God or Satan; that is, He put them in the position in the principle of creation of dealing with one master.
Then who, between Cain and Abel, the sons of the same father, is supposed to stand in the position to deal with God as the representation of good, and who is to stand in the position to deal with Satan as the representation of evil? Both Cain and Abel were the fruit of Eve’s fall. Consequently, this question was to be decided according to the course of the fall of Eve, who was the origin of the fall.
Eve’s fall consisted of two kinds of illicit love affairs. The first one was the spiritual fall through love with the archangel. The second was the physical fall through love with Adam. Both are, of course, the same in that they are fallen actions. However, when we want to decide which is more aligned with the Principle and more forgivable, we must say that the second act is more so than the first. This is because the second act of the fall was that in which Eve had intercourse with Adam, who was going to be her spouse in the Principle, out of her desire to go back to God’s side after realizing the illicit nature of the relationship with the archangel (cf. Part I, Ch. 2, Sec. II, 2–77). The first act of the fall was that in which she had the relationship with the archangel, who was not her spouse in the Principle, out of the excessive desire to enjoy what it was not yet time for her to enjoy; that is, to become like God, with her eyes opened (Gen. 3:5).
Cain and Abel were the fruits of Eve’s illicit love. Therefore, God had to discriminate conditionally between the two types of illicit acts of love committed centering on Eve, and had to set up Cain and Abel in the respective positions representing different situations. That is to say, Cain, being the fruit of the first love, was placed in the position to deal with Satan, as the representation of evil, symbolizing the first fallen act of love with the archangel. Abel, being the fruit of the second love, was placed in the position to deal with God, as the representation of good, symbolizing the second fallen act of love with Adam.
Originally, there was a standard in the Principle which provided that the first son succeed to the birthright. So, Satan also had more attachment to the elder than to the younger. Besides, Satan, being in the position of the ruler of the created world, intended to take Cain, to whom he was more attached. Therefore, God took Abel.
Let us take an example from the Bible. God said to Cain, “If you do not do well, sin is couching at the door.” (Gen. 4:7). From this, we may understand that Cain was placed in a position to deal with Satan. When the Israelites fled out of Egypt, God smote not only all the first-born of the Egyptians but also of their cattle (Ex. 12:29), because they were all in the position of Satan’s objects (Cain’s position). On the other hand, when the Israelites were restored into Canaan, only the Levities, who were in the position of the second son Abel, could carry the ark of the covenant (Deut. 31:25). There is also a Biblical record saying that God loved the second son Jacob and hated the first son Esau while they were still in their mother’s womb (Gen 25:23). This is because only the distinction of being the first-born or the second justified their respective positions of Cain and Abel. In the case of Jacob’s blessing of his grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh, he blessed them by crossing his hands to lay the right hand on the head of Ephraim, the younger son, to whom he wanted to give priority (Gen. 48:14). This, too, is because Ephraim was in the position of Abel. According to this principle, God had Abel and Cain offer sacrifices, having set them up respectively in the positions where each could deal with only one master, either God or Satan (Gen. 4:3-5).
God accepted Abel’s offering and rejected Cain’s. What must have been the reason? God accepted Abel’s offering (Gen. 4:4) because he offered the sacrifice acceptable to God’s will through good faith, in the objective position from which God could take it (Heb. 11:4). In this way, the foundation of faith to be set up in Adam’s family was laid. This was also to teach that God is ready to accept any man, though fallen, if a favorable condition is formed enabling God to take him. It was not because God really hated Cain that He rejected Cain’s offering. It was because God could not accept his offering unless Cain himself set up a certain condition justifying the acceptance of the offering, for Cain was placed in a position in which he could be taken by Satan.
By this example, God showed us that, in order for a man in the position of object to Satan to return to God’s side, he must set up a certain condition of indemnity. What kind of condition of indemnity should Cain have set up? This was the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature which we will discuss in detail later.
2. THE FOUNDATION OF SUBSTANCE
In order for Adam’s family to lay the foundation of substance, Cain would have had to set up the “condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature” so that God might be able to accept this offering with joy. How then should he have to set up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature?
The first human ancestors fell through the archangel, thus inheriting his fallen nature. Therefore, in order for fallen man to remove the fallen nature, he should have set up the condition of indemnity, according to the principle of restoration through indemnity, by taking a course in reverse to the way he obtained the fallen nature.
The archangel fell by failing to love Adam, whom God loved more. Therefore, the fallen nature of not taking the same position with God, came about. Consequently, in order to remove the fallen nature, Cain, who was in the position of the archangel, should have loved Abel, who was in the position of Adam, thus taking the same position with God. Next, the archangel fell because he failed to receive God’s love through Adam, who was closer to God, as the mediator. The archangel intended to take Adam’s position instead. Therefore, the fallen nature of not keeping one’s position came about. Consequently, in order to remove this fallen nature, Cain, who was in the position of the archangel, should have taken the position to receive God’s love through Abel, who was in the position of Adam, as the mediator, so that he might be able to keep his position.
Then, the archangel fell by his domination of Adam and Eve, who were supposed to dominate him. Therefore, the fallen nature of reversing domination came about. Consequently, in order for man to remove this fallen nature, Cain, who was in the position of the archangel, should have set up the law and system of domination by standing in the place to obey Abel, who was in the position of Adam, and to be dominated by him.
The will of goodness that man should not eat the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil should have been conveyed to God by Adam, by Adam to Eve, and by Eve to the archangel, thus multiplying goodness. However, on the contrary, the archangel conveyed to Eve the will of unrighteousness that the fruit could be taken and eaten, then Eve conveyed this to Adam, thus causing the human fall. Therefore, the fallen nature of multiplying sins came about. In order to remove this type of fallen nature, Cain, who was in the position of the archangel, should have established the position to multiply goodness by standing in the position relative to Abel, who was closer to God than himself, and by receiving the will of goodness through Abel.
Now, let us draw several examples corresponding to the offerings of Cain and Abel. In our individual body, our mind, which directs us toward goodness (Rom. 7:22) is in the position of Abel, while our body, tending to serve the law of sin (Rom. 7:25), is in the position of Cain. Consequently, only when our body obeys our mind’s command will our individual body be made good. However, in reality, our body always rebels against the command of our mind, thus repeating the same action in which Cain killed Abel. Therefore, our individual body becomes bad. Accordingly, life in religion may be called life to make our body obey our mind, directed toward the will of God,just as Cain should have obeyed Abel. Besides, man fell to the position of being deceitful above all things (Jer. 17:9); so he was supposed to go before God only through the created things, by setting these things in the position of Abel. This was the “offering”. Man’s tendency to look for good leaders and good friends, seen from the result, is derived from the desire of the divine mind to stand before God, by finding one who is in the position of Abel closer to God and by becoming one with him.
Christian faith teaches us to be gentle and humble so we may secure a position before God by finding in our daily life an Abel-type person, through these virtues. Starting from the individual to the family, the society, the race, the nation, and the world, there are always two types of persons; namely, Cain-type and Abel-type. Therefore, in order to restore all these to the original position of creation, the Cain-type person must obey and surrender to the Abel-type person. Jesus came to the world as the Abel whom the whole of mankind was to serve and obey. Therefore, he said, “…no one comes to the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).
If Adam’s family had succeeded in setting up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature through Cain’s obedience to Abel, they could have set up the foundation of substance on the foundation of faith already established. They could thus have restored the four position foundation, originally designed at the creation, by receiving the Messiah on the family-level foundation to receive the Messiah. However, Cain killed Abel, repeating the original fallen nature through which the archangel caused man to fall, and thus Adam’s family failed to set up the foundation of substance which was to be established then. Consequently, the providence of restoration centering on Adam’s family ended in failure.
3. THE FOUNDATION TO RECEIVE THE MESSIAH IN ADAM’S FAMILY
The foundation to receive the Messiah is realized by establishing the foundation of substance on the basis of having restored through indemnity the foundation of faith. From the standpoint of offering sacrifices, the foundation of faith is to be restored by acceptably making the symbolic offering, and the foundation of substance is to be realized by acceptably offering the substantial offering. Let us then inquire into the meaning and purpose of the symbolic offering and the substantial offering.
God’s three great blessings to man, the purpose of His creation, were to be realized when Adam and Eve, after having perfected their respective individualities, would become husband and wife, then multiply their children to form a family, and, further, they would come to rule the whole of creation. However, due to the fall, the three great blessings were not realized. In order to restore this, we must follow the course in reverse and establish the foundation of faith by offering the symbolic sacrifices through which both the condition of indemnity to restore the created things and the symbolic condition of indemnity to restore man can be set up at the same time.
Next, we must lay the foundation to receive the Messiah, after having set up the foundation of substance by offering the substantial sacrifices, which can be set up at the same time as the condition of indemnity to restore the children, and on this basis to restore the parents. Therefore, we may consider the meaning and purpose of the symbolic offering separately.
As we have discussed in the chapter on the “Fall of Man”, Satan, who came to dominate fallen men, has also dominated all things which were supposed to be under man’s dominion. It is for that reason that the Bible says all things are in travail together (Rom. 8:22). Therefore, the first purpose to give symbolic offerings with created things is to set up the condition of indemnity to restore all things, which are the symbolic substantial objects of God. Then, in order for man, who became deceitful above all things due to the fall (Jer. 17:9), to go before God, he must go through the created things, which are closer to God than himself, according to the order in the principle of creation. Accordingly, the second purpose for making symbolic offerings is to set up the symbolic condition of indemnity in order to restore substantial men before God.
Next, the substantial offering is an offering of the internal type; so, it is to be realized only on the basis of having acceptably made the symbolic offering of the external type, following the pattern of creating all things first and man afterwards. Therefore, we must first make the symbolic offering in an acceptable manner, thus setting up the condition of indemnity to restore all things, and the symbolic condition of indemnity to restore man at the same time. On that basis we must make the substantial offerings as the condition of indemnity to restore man substantially. Substantial offering means to set up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature in order to restore substantial man. If a Cain-type person should set up the condition of indemnity to restore children by making the substantial offering with the Abel-type person, this will also be reckoned as the condition of indemnity to restore parents, which will be elucidated; so, this substantial offering will become an acceptable one.
In order for Adam’s family to set up the foundation to receive the Messiah, Adam himself must first lay the foundation of faith through the symbolic offering. As noted above, the offering did not begin with Adam, because if Adam should offer the sacrifices, the offering would be for both God and Satan to deal with, so it would be in a non-principled position. Besides, there is another reason from the aspect of feeling and heart. The fallen Adam in fact was the very person who caused God the grief which will last thousands of generations. Therefore, Adam could never be the object of God’s heart, with whom God could directly deal in His providence of restoration.
Therefore, God had the second son Abel offer symbolic sacrifices instead of Adam. Thus the condition of indemnity to restore all things and the symbolic condition of indemnity to restore men were set up at the same time. Then, on this basis, if Cain and Abel had set up the condition of indemnity to restore children through the substantial offering, Adam, as the parent, would have stood on this foundation of substance and thus the foundation to receive the Messiah could have been realized at that time.
In order to offer the substantial sacrifices by setting up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature, the central figure to offer the sacrifice should be decided first. Therefore, we must understand the Abel’s symbolic offering had two purposes: first, to set up the foundation of faith in place of Adam; and second, to decide on Abel as the central figure to make the substantial offering.
The condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature was to be set up by Cain, and we must know how this could result in Adam’s family setting up the condition in its entirety. If the human ancestors had obeyed God’s words, God’s will could have been realized at that time; and, if the Jewish people had believed in Jesus, the will of Jesus could have been realized in his lifetime. In this case, too, if Cain had set up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature by obeying Abel, both Cain and Abel could have stood in the position of having established the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature while they were children. Since Cain and Abel were substantial beings derived from the division of Adam, who was the source of good and evil, Adam, as the parent, could have stood on the foundation of substance of having separated from Satan, if they had separated from Satan by setting up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature. Then, the foundation to receive the Messiah could have been laid in Adam’s family. In this manner, the condition of indemnity to restore the parents could be set up through the symbolic offering and substantial offering.
Meanwhile, Abel offered an acceptable sacrifice. Thus, the condition to restore through indemnity the foundation of faith, centering on Adam, and the position of Abel as the central figure to offer the substantial offering were set up successfully. However, by Cain’s killing Abel, they fell again into the same state as the archangel and Eve when they fell. Therefore, the substantial offering was a failure. They could not set up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature. Thus, they also failed to lay the foundation of substance. This prevented them from establishing the foundation to receive the Messiah. Therefore, the providence of restoration centering on Adam’s family came to naught.
The First Voice of the First Thunder:
the Voice of the First Woe
What Rev. Moon wrote on the pages 250-251 of his book Divine Principle about the failure of the providence of restoration in the Individual Level with Adam is as follows:
4. THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM ADAM’S FAMILY
“…..First, the failure of the providence of restoration centering on Adam’s family showed us God’s predestination for the fulfillment of the will and His attitude towards man’s portion of responsibility. Originally, God’s predestination of the will was supposed to be realized only when His portion of responsibility and man’s portion of responsibility could be combined. God could not instruct Cain and Abel on how to offer sacrifices because Cain’s decision whether or not to offer sacrifices through Abel was his portion of responsibility.
Second, after Cain killed Abel, God worked His providence through Seth. This showed us that God’s predestination for the will is an absolute one whereas His predestination for man to carry out the will is relative. God so predestined that, corresponding to His portion of responsibility, Abel should accomplish his own portion of responsibility and, thus, become the central figure for the substantial offering. Therefore, when Abel failed to accomplish his portion of responsibility, God, by setting up Seth in his place, intended to carry out the will, which was predestined as absolute.
Third, the offerings of Cain and Abel showed us that any fallen man can accomplish God’s will when he can find an Abel-type person and obey him in complete surrender.
Meanwhile, the providence identical to that which God intended to fulfill in Adam’s family has been repeated ever since due to the repeated failures arising from man’s disbelief. Accordingly, this persists as our own course of indemnity today. The providence of restoration, centering on Adam’s family, is a living lesson for us, showing us the typical course to follow….”
( The providence of restoration centering on Adam’s family was not fulfilled, because Cain killed Abel. Nevertheless, since God’s will to accomplish the purpose of creation was absolute and unchangeable, He set up Seth in place of Abel on the basis of Abel’s having been loyal and filial in heart. ) Gen. 4:25.
This Second Thunder can be found in the book ”Divine Principle” ,
on pages 251 to 260
Rev. Moon and the Second Sealed Thunder:
The Second Voice Unsealed: the Failure of the Providence of Restoration centering on Noah’s Family:
( Seen on pages 251-60 of the Divine Principle, concerning the providential understanding about Noah’s failure. )
SECTION II –
THE PROVIDENCE OF RESTORATION CENTERING ON NOAH’S FAMILY
The providence of restoration centering on Adam’s family was not fulfilled, because Cain killed Abel. Nevertheless, since God’s will to accomplish the purpose of creation was absolute and unchangeable, He set up Seth in place of Abel on the basis of Abel’s having been loyal and filial in heart (Gen. 4:25).
Then from among his descendants God chose Noah’s family to substitute for Adam’s family and recommenced His providence. As God said:
I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them; behold, I will destroy them with the earth. (Gen. 6:13)
He performed flood judgment. This clearly shows us that it was also the Last Days at that time. This is because God intended to fulfill the purpose of creation by sending the Messiah, on the foundation laid by Noah’s family, after the flood judgment. Noah’s family should have set up the condition of indemnity to restore the foundation of faith, and, based on that, they should have set up the condition of indemnity to restore the foundation of substance. By doing these things, Noah’s family should have restored, through indemnity, the foundation to receive the Messiah, which Adam’s family had failed to do.
1. THE FOUNDATION OF FAITH
(1) The Central Figure to Restore the Foundation of Faith
In the providence of restoration centering on Noah’s family, the central figure to restore the foundation of faith was Noah. God called Noah after ten generations, or 1,600 years after Adam, in order to fulfill with will, which ended in failure with Adam. Therefore, God blessed Noah to be fruitful and multiply (Gen. 9:7), just as He did Adam (Gen. 1:28). In that sense, Noah is the second human ancestor.
Noah was called when the earth was filled with violence through men (Gen. 6:11), and he worked on the ark for 120 years on the mountain, in obedience to God’s command, despite all the derision and scoffing of the people. On that condition, God could venture to judge the earth with the flood, centering on Noah’s family. In this aspect, Noah is the first father of faith. We know Abraham is the father of faith, but originally it was to be Noah. Due to his son Ham’s sinful act, Noah’s mission as the father of faith was shifted to Abraham.
Adam was to be the central figure to restore the foundation of faith, but because of the fore-mentioned reason, he could not offer sacrifices himself. However, Noah was called on the basis of Abel’s having been faithful and filial in acceptably offering the symbolic sacrifices. Besides, as seen from his lineage, he was a descendant of Seth (Gen. 4:25) called in place of Abel. Furthermore, he was a righteous man in the sight of God (Gen. 6:9). Therefore, he could offer symbolic sacrifices directly by building the ark in obedience to God’s will.
(2) The Conditional Objects to Restore the Foundation of Faith
For Noah, the conditional object by which the foundation of faith could be restored was the ark. What did the ark signify? In order for Noah to stand in Adam’s position as the second human ancestor, he had to set up the condition to restore through indemnity the whole universe, which was under Satanic control due to Adam’s fall. Consequently, he had to offer as sacrifices, acceptably before God, certain conditional objects symbolizing the new universe. The ark was his conditional object.
The ark consisted of three floors, to symbolize the universe created through the three stages of growth. The eight members of Noah’s family who entered the ark were to restore through indemnity the eight members of Adam’s family, who fell into Satan’s bosom. Since the ark was the symbol of the whole universe, the master of the ark, Noah, symbolized God. His family symbolized mankind, and the animals symbolized all things.
What was the purpose of God’s 40-day flood judgment, which He exercised after the completion of the ark? According to the principle of creation, man was made to serve one master. God could not work His providence in the non-principled realm by dealing with mankind, when man remained under Satan due to his own lustfulness.
Therefore, He exercised the providence of the flood judgment to destroy the men subject to Satan, and to set up the objects through whom He could exercise His providence. Why did He decide that His judgment should be 40 days? As will be discussed later (cf. Part II, Ch. 3, Sec, II, 4–381), the number “ten” is the number of unity. Therefore, God set up Noah ten generations after Adam to restore through indemnity the will left unaccomplished because of Adam’s fall. He set up the indemnity period to restore the number “ten” in the second attempt at unification. Through ten generations up to Noah, God also continued His providence of setting up each generation as the indemnity period to restore the number “four” to fulfill the purpose of the four position foundation. Consequently, the period from Adam to Noah was the indemnity period to restore the number “40”. Due to the lustfulness of the people of that time, the indemnity period for the number “40” was invaded by Satan. In order that God might recommence His providence to accomplish the four position foundation through Noah’s ark, He intended to restore the foundation of faith by setting up the 40-day period of judgment as the indemnity period to restore the number “40” invaded by Satan.
In this way, the number “40” became necessary as the number to separate Satan in order later to restore the foundation of faith in the providential course of restoration through indemnity. For example, we see many instances comparable to the 40-day judgment in Noah’s day: the 400-year period from Noah to Abraham; the 400 years of slavery of Egypt of the Israelites; 40 years of wandering in the wilderness; Moses’ 40-day fast; 40 years each of the rule of Kings Saul, David, and Solomon; Elijah’s 40-day fast; Jonah’s 40-day prediction of the destruction of Nineveh; Jesus’ 40-day fast and prayer; and his 40-day period of resurrection. All are indemnity periods for separation from Satan.
We also read in the Bible that, after the judgment, Noah sent out a raven and a dove from the ark. Let us now investigate what kind of providence for the future God foreshadowed through this, for God said, “Surely the Lord God does nothing without revealing his secret to his servants the prophets.” (Amos 3:7). The 40-day period of judgment as the condition of indemnity to restore the universe corresponds to the period of chaos (Gen. 1:2). Therefore, all the things centering on the ark after the 40 days are the symbolic representation of the entire course of history after God completed His creation of heaven and earth.
What did God foreshadow by sending from the ark a raven (Gen. 8:6-7) which flew about until the water subsided? This indicated that Satan crouched at the door of Noah’s family, even after the flood judgment, to spy on the condition for invasion there, just as the archangel looked for a chance to win Eve’s love right after the creation of man and just as Satan watched for the opportunity to invade Cain and Abel when they offered sacrifices (Gen. 4:7).
Next, what did God foreshadow when Noah sent a dove three times from the ark? It is recorded in the Bible that the dove was sent forth to find out if the water had subsided. However, if that had been the only purpose, we may think that Noah could look out directly through the window to learn for himself, instead of sending out the dove. Therefore, we can imagine that the purpose of sending for the dove lay in something more important than seeing if the water had dried up.
We must understand the significance of God’s providence in this situation. Seven days after God announced the flood judgment through Noah (Gen. 7:10), the flood came. It was after the 40-day period of judgment that Noah first sent out the dove. The Bible says that the dove went to and fro over the water but finding no place to set her foot, she returned to the ark, and Noah brought her into the ark (Gen. 8:9). The first dove symbolized the first Adam. Therefore, this story means that God created man on earth so that His ideal of creation, which had been in Him even before creation, might be realized in Adam as the perfect incarnation. But due to Adam’s fall, God could not realize His ideal of creation on earth through Adam, so God had to take back His ideal from earth for the time being and postpone the realization of His will.
Seven days later, Noah sent out the dove the second time. She could not set foot on the earth then because the water had not dried up. She returned to the ark with an olive leaf in her mouth, signifying that she would be able to alight the next time (Gen. 8:10-11). The second dove symbolized Jesus, as the second Adam, who would come as the perfect incarnation of the ideal of creation. Therefore, this second story signifies that Jesus would come to earth in order to accomplish the providence of restoration. But in case of the Jewish people’s disbelief, he would go back to God’s bosom, through the cross, leaving a promise to come again, because, with no place to “set his feet”, he could not fulfill the will on earth. Of course, this foreshadowing indicates that, if the water had dried up so that the dove could alight and find something to eat, she did not have to return to the ark, but she had to go back because the water had not yet subsided. Likewise, this indicates that if the Jewish people were to believe in him and serve him, Jesus would not die, being able to realize the Kingdom of Heaven on earth at that time. But in the case of their disbelief, Jesus would have to die on the cross and come again later at a more favorable time.
After another seven days, Noah sent out the dove the third time. It is written that this time the dove did not come back to the ark because the water had dried up (Gen. 8:12). The third dove symbolized the Lord of the Second Advent who would come as the third Adam. Consequently, this story indicates that, when Christ comes again, he will be able to realize God’s ideal of creation on earth without fail so that the ideal will never have to go back to God’s bosom. When Noah found that the third dove would not return, he then came down from the ark to the earth and enjoyed the new heaven and earth. This foreshadows that, when the ideal of creation will be realized on earth through the third Adam, then the new Jerusalem will descend from heaven and God’s dwelling will be among men (Rev. 21:1-3).
The story of having sent out the dove three times shows us that, as clarified in the chapter on predestination, God’s providence of restoration could be prolonged in case that man, who is the object of the providence, could not fulfill his portion of responsibility. This foreshadowed that, due to Adam’s failure in carrying out his responsibility because of his disbelief, Christ had to come as the second Adam, and that if the Jewish people should fail to fulfill their responsibility because of their disbelief, Jesus would have to die on the cross and thus Christ would have to come again as the third Adam. The period of seven days here shows us that, just as God’s creation took seven days, it will also take a certain period in the providence to restore the lost element.
In the meantime, Noah’s family could restore through indemnity the foundation of faith by acceptably setting up the ark as the condition to restore the foundation through the 40-day judgment.
2. THE FOUNDATION OF SUBSTANCE
Noah restored through indemnity the foundation of faith by succeeding in making the symbolic offering of the ark acceptable to God. By this, Noah set up, at the same time, the condition of indemnity for the restoration of all the created things and also the condition of indemnity for the restoration of men, in symbolic terms. Next, if Noah’s sons, Shem and Ham, had succeeded in the substantial offering by setting up the condition of indemnity to remove the fallen nature, in the respective positions of Cain and Abel, the foundation of substance could have been established at that time.
In order for Noah’s family to offer the substantial offering acceptably after the success in the symbolic offering, the second son, Ham, who was the central figure for the substantial offering, ought to have restored the position of the second son Abel, who had been the central figure for the substantial offering in Adam’s family. In the case of Adam’s family, Abel, the son, offered the symbolic offering in place of Adam. Therefore, when he succeeded in that offering, Abel could restore through indemnity the foundation of faith, while at the same time, he was destined to be the central figure for the substantial offering. However, in the case of Noah’s family, Noah himself offered a symbolic sacrifice. In order for Ham to stand in the position of Abel, who had succeeded in the symbolic offering, he should have remained in a position of inseparable oneness with the heart and feeling of Noah, who had succeeded in the symbolic offering. Let us, then, examine how God worked His providence in order to have Ham stand in the position of inseparable oneness with Noah’s heart and feeling.
We read (Gen. 9:20-26) that Ham, upon seeing his father Noah lie naked in the tent, was not only ashamed of it, but even displeased with it, and that he stirred up the same emotion among his brothers, Shem and Japheth. Then they too were agitated by Ham in the same emotion to feel ashamed of their father’s nakedness; and in an effort not to see that scene, they turned their faces and walked backward to cover their father’s body with a garment. However, this was such a crime that Noah cursed Ham, saying that his son Canaan should be a slave to his brothers.
Why did God work His providence in such a way, and why was the feeling of shame at Noah’s nakedness such a sin? In order to understand this, let us first determine what sin is. Satan cannot emit the power of existence and action unless he finds an object with which to form a correlative base on which to have a mutual relationship of give and take. Therefore, whenever any being makes a condition for Satan to invade and thus becomes an object with which Satan can work, sin is created.
Next, we must understand why God tested Ham through Noah’s nakedness. It has already been stated that the ark symbolized the whole universe and that all the things done immediately after the acceptable offering of the ark, through the 40-day judgment, therefore symbolized everything since the creation of the universe. Consequently, Noah’s position right after the 40-day judgment was identical to that of Adam after the creation of the universe.
We can well imagine how unreserved and affectionate with each other Adam and Eve were after the creation, and how frank and without concealment they were before God. We can conclude this from the fact that they did not have the feeling of shame, even though they were naked (Gen. 2:25). But after the fall, they became ashamed of the nakedness of their lower parts, covered them with fig leaves and concealed themselves from God, fearing that He might see (Gen. 3:7). Therefore, their act caused by feeling ashamed of their lower parts was an expression of their feeling due to their sinful blood relationship with Satan committed through their lower parts. The action of concealing themselves by covering their lower parts was the expression of their guilty conscience, which deterred them from appearing before God after their blood relationship with Satan.
Noah, in the position of separation from Satan through the 40-day judgment, ought to have stood in the position of Adam right after the creation of the universe. In this case, God wanted to restore through indemnity the heart and feeling of joy He had experienced, looking at innocent naked man, without concealment before he committed the crime, by looking at Noah’s family neither feeling shameful nor trying to hide themselves at the sight of Noah’s nakedness. God had Noah lie naked in order to fulfill such a profound will. Consequently, Ham could have set up the condition of indemnity to restore the position of Adam’s family, which had never known any shame before the first sin, on Ham’s foundation of inseparable oneness with Noah through dealing with Noah without any sense of shame; that is, from the same position and heart as God.
However, on the contrary, Noah’s sons were ashamed of their father’s nakedness and covered him with a garment, thus showing that they could not appear before God because they were ashamed of their blood relationship with Satan, as was the case in Adam’s family after the fall. Therefore, Satan, who had been watching to see if there was any condition for him to invade in Noah’s family, as foreshadowed through the raven, did invade with Noah’s sons as his objects because they had shown themselves to be Satan’s lineal descendants.
In this manner, Ham’s act in being ashamed of his father’s nakedness became a sin, because it created a condition for Satan to invade. Thus, Ham failed to restore through indemnity the position of Abel from which to offer a substantial sacrifice, and failed to establish the foundation of substance. Thus, the providence of restoration centering on Noah ended in failure.
Would it be a sin for anyone to be ashamed of his nakedness? No. Noah had the mission of removing all the conditions which allowed Satan to invade, because Noah was substituting for Adam. Therefore, Noah’s family should have set up the condition of indemnity to restore the position of Adam’s family before the blood relationship with Satan, by demonstrating that they were not ashamed of nakedness, and thus did not worry about covering it. In consequence, the condition of indemnity showing that they neither felt ashamed of nakedness nor cared to cover it was a condition that only Noah’s family could set up, for Noah’s family was in the position of Adam’s family.
The Second Voice of the First Thunder:
the Voice of the Second Woe
What Rev. Moon wrote on the pages 260-261 of his book Divine Principle about the failure of the providence of restoration in the Familial Level with Noah is as follows:
4. THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM NOAH’S FAMILY
“……….It is not easy to understand why Noah built an ark on the mountain for 120 long years. Ham knew that Noah’s family was saved due to the toils of his father–toils for which he had been mocked and criticized. Considering all these things, Ham should have regarded his father’s works as good and meaningful, even though he was displeased with his father’s nakedness.
Instead of trusting Noah, who was on the side of God, Ham criticized him from a self-centered perspective, and showed his displeasure in his action. Therefore, the providence centering on Noah’s family, which God had set up by exercising the 40-day flood judgment 1,600 years after Adam, ended in failure. This shows us that we need patience and obedience to go the way of Heaven.
Next, God’s providence through Noah’s family shows us God’s attitude about predestination and the accomplishment of man’s own responsibility. We know well enough that Noah’s family was that which God found after 1,600 years of search, which He directed for 120 years until Noah finished the ark, and which He kept intact at the sacrifice of the whole of mankind by the 40-day flood. However, when Satan invaded the family through Ham’s mistake, God abandoned without reserve the entire family, which was the object of His providence of restoration, and thus His providence centering on Noah’s family ended in failure.
Moreover, the providence through Noah’s family shows us what God’s predestination for man is like. We must not forget that, in spite of His having found Noah as the father of faith after such a long period, God abandoned the family once it failed to accomplish its portion of responsibility and elected Abraham’s family in its place……”
+++++++============= ◊ ===============+++++++
The Scripture is fulfilled;
Repent and Atone, for the Time is surely at Hand,
a Time so Terrible that it has not been seen since the Beginning of the Creation of God,
as it is written;
21: “…. For then there will be (The) Great Tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time,
nor ever shall be.
22: “And except those days had been shortened, there should no flesh be saved:
but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short….”
The Stolen Thunders of Azazyel,
revealed by the hand of Sun Myung Moon
Sun Myung Moon in My Generation as our John the Baptist:
What was “the Lamp that Burned and Shined” ???
The Pillar of Fire, the Day-Star:
and the Moon
My Father spke of the Lamp that burned and shined, but what he referred to as what “burned” was the Pillar of Fire that burned at Night, and the Moon that Shined as when in Paradise the Light of the Moon symbolized the Virginity of Eve. Thus John was this “Pillar of Fire” that was burning until the Day arrived…as Jesus the Pillar of Cloud as the Covenant of the Day, which would succeed the mission of John as the “Pillar of Fire by Night” that led Israel until the Messiah was to arrive, symbolizing the “Pillar of Fire” as the “Covenant of the Night’, since the Messenger stood for the Messiah himself until he arrived; just as the Pillar of Fire on the earth guided Israel during the Night; and the Pillar of Cloud, high above in the Air, visible for miles, guided Israel during the Day.
What was it that “shined”? My Father was referring to the Moon; as when Israel entered the Promised Land the Two Covenants of the Day and the Night reverted back to the Two Original Rulers of Day and Night, namely, the Sun and the Moon. This could be seen as having the Masculine Principle stand over Mount Gibeon as the Male Symbol, and the Moon or Feminine Principle stand over the Valley of Ajalon, as the Female Symbol.
The saying of “..and the throne of David as the Sun…” refers to the Sun as the Masculine Principle restored, of course. It also explains that the Greek myth of Daedalus and Icarus referred to David and Solomon. David ruled his Chariot, as the moving throne of the Sun with a “heart that was perfect before Jehovah” did well, and Solomon, as we know, could not control his Chariot-throne and fell….to become Apollo, as the last of the gods; when he sold himself to the Devil for what he believed was immortality.
The Gospel of Repentance of John and the Gospel of the Kingdom of Jesus
John the Baptist also preached “The Gospel of Repentance”, just as Rev. Moon constantly implored his followers to always remember the broken heart of God every second. The sorrow was real, but the way Rev. Moon used this was as a thief coming in by the window…and ignoring my Father Jesus: the Door.
Few people understand the real scope and power of the responsibility and the power that was given to Rev. Moon as the messenger of Jehovah of Hosts. First of all, as with John in the position of Elijah the Seal of God, the Messenger rules in the position of the Messiah until the Messiah arrives. And after the Messiah arrives the Soul of the Messenger stand surrogate for the Bride: until the Messenger delivers to the Bridegroom the Kingdom as the Bride as the Meek or People of Submission themselves.
As David said, “….This people is now flesh of my flesh, and bone of my bone…”, even as Adam had said of Eve.
My Father Jesus spoke of John as “the Lamp that burned and shined” after John the Baptist had been beheaded by Herod Antipas, Herod the Great’s eldest son.
The 7 Sealed Thunders of Revelation; 6 of which were revealed by Rev. Moon,
as of the 7 levels of the Providence:
Unification Theology from Individual to Global,
Restored New Unification Theology from Global to Universal,
The Universal as the Cosmic Level of the Restoration, and the Kingdom of Heaven and Earth as the Creation
The Kingdom of Heaven and Earth as the 7th Level of Restoration
A critical look at the first Six Levels of the Restoration of the 3 Great Blessings; from Adam to Jesus:
and the 7 Failures of the 7 lords of Restoration, as their Voices of Judgment:
by the 7 heralds of Dis
The Failure of the Messenger Rev. Moon at the 7th Voice of the 7 Sealed Thunders
Revealed by the Angel of the Covenant of Jonathan, in chapter 10 of Revelation,
after whom John the Baptist was named: the Messenger of God
The 1st Global Mission
of the Lord of the Second Advent
The Reunification of Korea
Tathagata Maitreya: Philip Sobul Love in Korea
When we look at the incredible contribution of Korea and Rev. Moon, who was it’s Priest, standing in the position of “…the Messenger of Jehovah of Hosts…”, one thing stands out above everything else: his deep understanding of the 7 Levels of the Providence of Restoration, and how the 3 Great Blessings, originally given to Adam in Paradise, are seen in every step of the 7 Rungs of the Ladder of Jacob as the Vertical Ascension seen in the Providence of Salvation; indemnified Horizontally, step by step, by all 7 lords of the Restoration of Creation.
Rev. Moon was, of course, the 7th Shepherd, or lord of the Restoration: as the Messenger with the New Body of John the Baptist. But he could have become the Messiah, had he been found watching for me at “the Day and the Hour”, seen in the Revelation at chapter 17.
As my Father Jesus once said;
“…..Who receiveth WHOMSOEVER I send:
I was rejected by Rev. Moon’s watchdogs in the Unification Church at their HQ in NYC starting in 1988 after I sent a 144 page letter to the directors of HSA-UWC, from my servant John sent to me by my Father Jesus
It was read by Jonathan Gullery, who did not pass it on to Rev. Moon, thus Jonathan, in particular, failed his POR
Others, who came after him, from Eric Holt all the way to Magnus, also dismissed me: for the next 25 years.
The Three Great Blessings
There is little doubt that Rev. Moon was the first one to find the pattern of the three great blessings, and how the restoration of these Three Blessings was to be found at every level of the 7 levels of the providence by the 7 lords of the restoration: and conclusively.
It would be idiotic to deny that this was actually something that each providential and central figure was doing to fulfill the will of God, since Rev. Moon shows exactly how Jacob, Abraham, Moses and others were set in doing this very thing.
The numerical evidence alone outweighs any denial: and Rev. Moon did not originate or make up these things, they are now there clearly revealed to the entire world, or at least to those now or formerly in the Unification Church, and lastly myself, as one who learned how to read at an early age.
Starting at about page 351 of the black book we have Rev. Moon’s exposition of the 3 great temptations in the correspondent course of the pattern of these 3 great blessing in an exact parallel, showing how Jesus restores these blessings in his 40 day course in the Wilderness at the global level.
This makes perfect sense until Mr. Moon says my Father was a failure who was crucified in the position of John the Baptist and who did not even resurrect in his flesh and bone, as Jesus conclusively states and says to Doubting Thomas in the Gospel, but for Rev. Moon the Gospel can be dispensed with; and for those who are truly wise like himself we must aver that Jesus was just a “spirit” after his resurrection, wandering now as a ghost transcendent of “space and time”, who could even appear in locked rooms and was therefore not in a physical body because that would be IMPOSSIBLE: according to Rev. Moon.
Rev. Moon then says my Father Jesus died without performing any of the duties of the Messiah ( forgetting Palm Sunday, when he entered Zion in Glory with Lazarus who he raised from the dead, in the position of John the Baptists dead body, fulfilled the Scripture as Christ the Lord in Zechariah, beyond the shadow of a doubt ) and then Mr. Moon leaves the Gospel of Christ with Korean punctuality as soon as it suited him: which was immediately after 1960 when he said he was the Lamb and that he had fulfilled all of the scripture and that Bo Hui Pak was then John the Baptist and….well……we know what happened next at Yankee Stadium in 1976 when it went so terribly, terribly wrong.
But the three great blessings of “ ( 1) be fruitful, ( 2) multiply, ( 3), subdue the earth and have dominion”; were clearly pointed out as being what the pattern was when the devil asked Jesus to turn stone into bread ( as being fruitful in attaining the powers of Adam or “son of God”), and then to throw himself down ( as the angels would catch him because he was “the son of God” ), and then to worship him and be given the whole earth as the dominion ( because then he would have dominion as the “son of God” )
Rev. Moon clearly stated that Jesus overcame the devil and that the three great blessings were then restored in this exact pattern: but then, we have a problem: this is not the version we see in Luke.
The version we see in Luke is different, and the terminology and the tone are completely different as well. If one is wrong then the other is right: but Rev. Moon showed that Matthew was the exact pattern of the 3 Blessings restored; so now we have some flawed human scribe called Luke who got it all wrong and we can move on: right?
No.. Not at all.
We can’t. And we can’t because this was meant to be this way, for the one who would take the road of Joseph, who becomes the one called “the faithful and wise steward / servant” of Luke and Matthew, and for the Son of Joseph, who is unknown: but is the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel.
The Prodigal Son of David: Solomon.
But this Solomon is the one who built the 3 altars on the Mount of Olives to the Triple Goddess, one for Ashtoreth, one for Molech and one for the goddess Milcom….but the one for the daughter of Pharaoh was the worst, for which it can now can be revealed that this was the real reason that my Father Jesus prayed 3 times to God that the Cup of Death would pass from him at Gethsemane, not far from where Solomon built the 3 altars for his wives: and now you will know why that happened.
The one that my Father Jesus was really fighting with in the wilderness for that 40 days: the one who had sold himself to the Devil and been given all the kingdoms of the earth long before Jesus ever walked in Galilee: that fallen one was Solomon.
Solomon, Apollyon, the black sheep; the one lost of the 100 was the lost sheep, as that one who had to be restored of the 99 to once again have the 100. This is why my Father said.
“…For the son of man has come to seek and to save that which was lost..”
He wasn’t talking about mankind itself in a generality: he was specifically referring to Solomon, the prodigal son of David, who had fallen into the clutches of the devil and who which the 10 tribes had also then followed into the abyss as well, because Solomon dragged them down with him. The 12 tribes were separated and the 10 of the Northern Tribes were given to Rehoboam, as of when the garment he wore was ripped into 12 pieces by the prophet, and 10 pieces given to him due to Solomon having fallen….and when Solomon died Rehoboam came back from hiding in Egypt….thus the division once again of the ten and the two….as seen with the ten sons of Jacob with Leah…as opposed to the two from Rachel, Joseph and Benjamin…
That is why the garment that had been that of the king was ripped into 12 pieces by the prophet and the ten were lost, as the 10 tribes were soon to become lost; and only two pieces remained, which were all of the kingdom of Judah remaining.
This is why, although few know the reason why this is written in the Old Testament.
Solomon was he who feared Death more than God, and who sold himself to Satan the Devil and became Apollo, the one that Zeus, or Azazyel, the fallen Strength of God, who was the Archangel in Paradise, called the god of the sun: Apollo, the last of the gods. The one who gained the whole earth: but lost his soul.
“For all the evil men do under the sun”
That was the refrain of Solomon: but none knew why.
If you look at the order of the temptations in Luke you will see it was: stone into bread: fall down and worship me, and then; he was taken to the pinnacle of the Temple: and then told, throw yourself down.
But this order of temptations does not match the pattern of the three great blessings.
But it does match one, the one in which Solomon fell when he was tempted the three times: and fell at the first one with the mark on the hand; commanding the fallen angels with the ring for sorcery, and then the second, with the mark on the forehead for worshipping the dragon and to be able to disappear anytime he desired with the cloak of invisibility, and then the third, to be given the power to “go between”, and appear anywhere he desired on earth which was that of the winged shoes of his fallen dominion:; as ruling over the invisible realms of the jinn or spirits in the 3 lower heavens above the earth and the 3 upper hells below it with the djinn: becoming that Angel of the Abyss, the King of his, and then others ‘Self Destruction”….Apollyon…otherwise known as “Apollo”, the last of the gods…as of “the sun”. of which Solomon wrote of all that was “…under the sun..”
There are then three Solomon’s, the younger one, as we see in the Song of Songs, where he finds the female aspect of the soul in his kingship, and then the middle-aged vision of the wise but cynical king in Proverbs, and then at the end, the bitter and skeptically adrift king, in Ecclesiastes.
But it was in his old age that Solomon began to seek how to circumvent his coming death, as the Devil had by that time convinced him that nothing of life would be his portion but the grave; annihilation, in short. Solomon did not believe in resurrection…for him Death was final…and everlasting….
The Word in its letter is Death: in the stark utterances of Moses and others Solomon interpreted the texts with a more and more concrete literalism; the vision we finally see in Ecclesiastes: no possibility of resurrection, and no place after life but the grave. Man and the beast both have the same life; and are the same in sharing equally the same death.
The question is then this; who destroyed Solomon? His own shadow, materialism, Midas.
The 666 talents of gold that we see Solomon collect is in I Kings 10:14, in “one year”.
This “Midas touch” was of his own spiritual materialism, the “daughter” turned to gold in the mth of Midas is the “soul” Solomon lost by selling his soul to the Devil and worshipping him to be given dominion over the earth.
This is Apollo, rational delusion as Apollyon: self-destruction, the nemesis of Solomon: he who fell in love with his own life or soul, loving only his own life itself, as they of the Northern Kingdom who fell in love with themselves as seen in the myth of Narcissus, the silly dove of Ephraim, in love with their own vain image of themselves: the internal imagination created of their idolization of themselves. Thus the rose suspended over the Abyss is Solomon in love with his own reflection or soul; but it is this very thing that he loses by trying to hold onto it above all else.
So who does the devil worship?
Solomon destroyed himself, he was his own worst enemy, like David was with Bathsheba, but this happened because his fear of Death and the thought that there was nothing after this life but the grave was able to be so pressed into his mind by Satan that he sold himself to continue his existence at any cost, although he thought he had made the best of a bad situation in the bargain for his terms.
He worshipped Satan upon the Mercyseat of the Ark that Moses had had Bezaleel build, and Solomon had then had brought into the very Temple he had built. But he ruined his own ideal.
Sensual lust was only part of it, the rest was the desire for immortality at any cost.
Thus he traded the Ark for his own life, or so he thought.
And that is when it vanished: right to Baal Hermon, the White Mountain at the northernmost boundary of Israel, the real ‘Olympus’ where the third of the host of the angels came down, and took wives of the daughters of men.
It’s other name???? Mount Sion…..
And now we shall have a little voyage of discovery. It’s very much like the yacht called New Hope that Rev. Moon used to sail around on: except that the reason that I was brought out from San Francisco after it fell: to start over in New Hope; is the same reason that it was said that the coming of the Son of Man would be as when Lot was led out of Sodom after it was judged; to start a new family in Zoar.
As I said, the full story was the one I decided to tell you right from the start, a partial or incomplete explanation at this point would be worse than none at all.
Right now it is you, my friend, who represent the Last Hope of the Unification Church. My friend Glenn Emery is considered a pariah, as he left the Church and took back the Blessing Rev. Moon stole from My Generation, though they don’t know it,, and I am not even considered to be anyone of account by the inverse racism due to the Korean bias, that bias being as of the fact I am not a Korean.
There is little doubt that you placed high in the estimation of those you served because they saw something in you they decided to reward. But my servant John knows the real reason of your reward: and now both he and my Father Jesus have brought things to this pass so that you will have a real choice; not a fake one.
Amen, and so be it. Now let us begin…..