The Entire Letter …….
The Story that has now “Appeared” like Magic
Washington, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Judiciary Committee Republicans today sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein calling for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate unaddressed matters, some connected to the 2016 election and others, including many actions taken by Obama Administration officials like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The letter follows yesterday’s House Judiciary Committee approval of H. Res. 446, as amended, to request documents pertaining to the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton.
In their letter, the Judiciary Committee members express concern that the directive given to Special Counsel Robert Mueller is narrow in scope and many concerns arising out of the 2016 presidential election and its aftermath are not being investigated. The members call for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate grave concerns such as former Attorney General Lynch’s directive to former FBI Director Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the investigation into former Secretary Clinton; the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions related to the Clinton email investigation, including the immunity deals given to potential co-conspirators; selected leaks of classified information that unmasked U.S. persons incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community; and the FBI’s reliance on “Fusion GPS” in its investigation of the Trump campaign, among many others issues.
Hillary Clinton and James Comey now under Investigation
July 27, 2017
Dear Attorney General Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein:
We are writing to you to request assistance in restoring public confidence in our nation’s justice system and its investigators, specifically the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). We need to enable these agencies to perform their necessary and important law enforcement and intelligence functions fully unhindered by politics. While we presume that the FBI’s investigation into Russian influence has been subsumed into Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, we are not confident that other matters related to the 2016 election and aftermath are similarly under investigation by Special Counsel Mueller. The unbalanced, uncertain, and seemingly unlimited focus of the special counsel’s investigation has led many of our constituents to see a dual standard of justice that benefits only the powerful and politically well-connected. For this reason, we call on you to appoint a second special counsel to investigate a plethora of matters connected to the 2016 election and its aftermath, including actions taken by previously public figures like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Many Democrats and members of the Washington media previously called for a “special prosecutor” to investigate Russian influence on the election and connections with the Trump campaign. Not surprisingly, once you actually made the decision to appoint a special counsel, the calls for further investigations by congressional committees continued, focused on allegations that have heretofore produced no evidence of criminality, despite the fact that over a year has passed since the opening of the original FBI investigation. Political gamesmanship continues to saturate anything and everything associated with reactions to President Trump’s executive decisions, and reveals the hypocrisy of those who refuse to allow the Special Counsel’s investigation to proceed without undue political influence. It is an unfortunate state of affairs.
Your stated rationale for recommending Director Comey’s termination as FBI Director was his mishandling of former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation and associated public disclosures concerning the investigation’s findings. We believe this was the correct decision. It is clear that Director Comey contributed to the politicization of the FBI’s investigations by issuing his public statement, nominating himself as judge and jury, rather than permitting career DOJ prosecutors to make the final decision. But many other questions remain unanswered, due to Mr. Comey’s premature and inappropriate decision, as well as the Obama Justice Department’s refusal to respond to legitimate Congressional oversight. Last week, the Republican Members of this Committee sent a letter to the Justice Department, asking for responses to those unanswered inquiries. These questions cannot, for history’s sake and for the preservation of an impartial system of justice, be allowed to die on the vine.
It is therefore incumbent on this Committee, in our oversight capacity, to ensure that the agencies we oversee are above reproach and that the Justice Department, in particular, remains immune to accusations of politicization. Many Congressional entities have been engaged in oversight of Russian influence on the election, but a comprehensive investigation into the 2016 Presidential campaign and its aftermath must, similarly, be free of even the suggestion of political interference. The very core of our justice system demands as much. A second, newly-appointed special counsel will not be encumbered by these considerations, and will provide real value to the American people in offering an independent perspective on these extremely sensitive matters.
Our call for a special counsel is not made lightly. We have no interest in engendering more bad feelings and less confidence in the process or governmental institutions by the American people. Rather, our call is made on their behalf. It is meant to determine whether the criminal prosecution of any individual is warranted based on the solemn obligation to follow the facts wherever they lead and applying the law to those facts.
As we referenced above, Democrats and the mainstream media called for a special counsel to be appointed to investigate any Russian influence on President Trump’s campaign. Their pleas were answered, but there are many questions that may be outside the scope of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. This was clear following Mr. Comey’s recent testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8, 2017, which ignited renewed scrutiny of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and the actions she took to mislead the public concerning the investigation into the Clinton email investigation. Last year, this Committee inquired repeatedly about the circumstances surrounding that and other matters, but our inquiries were largely ignored.
During his testimony, Mr. Comey referenced a meeting on the Phoenix airport tarmac between Ms. Lynch and former President Bill Clinton. Mr. Comey raised concerns about Ms. Lynch’s conduct, and questioned her independence, stating:
At one point, the attorney general had directed me not to call it an investigation, but instead to call it a matter, which confused me and concerned me. That was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude, ‘I have to step away from the department if we’re to close this case credibly.’
In addition, in preparing to testify in front of Congress for a September 2015 hearing, Mr. Comey asked Ms. Lynch at the time whether she was prepared to refer to the Clinton investigation as just that, an “investigation.” Mr. Comey testified that Ms. Lynch said, “Yes, but don’t call it that, call it a matter.” Mr. Comey retorted, “Why would I do that?” Ms. Lynch answered, “Just call it a matter.” Mr. Comey stated that he acquiesced, but it gave him “a queasy feeling,” since it gave him the “impression that the attorney general was trying to align how we describe our work” with how the Clinton campaign was talking about it.
Notwithstanding the fact that the FBI is the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and not the Federal Bureau of Matters, one is hard-pressed to understand why Ms. Lynch directed then-Director Comey to call the Clinton investigation a “matter” unless she intended to use such deceptive language to help wrongly persuade the American people that former Secretary Clinton was not, in fact, the subject of a full-scale FBI investigation, or to otherwise undermine the integrity of the investigation.
Following Director Comey’s Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, Senator Dianne Feinstein was asked about the testimony while appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Senator Feinstein stated, “I would have a queasy feeling too, though, to be candid with you, I think we need to know more about that, and there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”
We share Senator Feinstein’s and Mr. Comey’s concerns – specifically, that during the midst of a contentious Presidential election, which was already rife with scandal arising from Secretary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information, that our nation’s chief law enforcement officer would instruct the FBI Director, her subordinate, to mislead the American public about the nature of the investigation. Following Ms. Lynch’s directive to downplay the Clinton investigation as a “matter,” Director Comey infamously terminated the Clinton investigation, stating, “[a]lthough there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”
Mr. Comey’s testimony has provided new evidence that Ms. Lynch may have used her position of authority to undermine the Clinton investigation. At any other point in history this accusation would entail a shock to the conscience of law abiding Americans who expect a DOJ free of political influence. We only have, however, an investigation into Russian influence on the 2016 election, including any ties to the Trump campaign. To limit our nation’s insight into just this this single component of the 2016 election will only cause the special counsel’s work to be derided as one-sided and incomplete. The special counsel’s work must begin and end unimpeded by political motivations on either side of the aisle. For these reasons, the following points must also be fully investigated – ideally, via a second special counsel. This is imperative to regain the cherished trust and confidence in our undoubtedly distressed law enforcement and political institutions.
We call on a newly appointed special counsel to investigate, consistent with appropriate regulations, the following questions, many of which were previously posed by this Committee and remain unanswered:
- Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation;
- The shadow cast over our system of justice concerning Secretary Clinton and her involvement in mishandling classified information;
- FBI and DOJ’s investigative decisions related to former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation, including the propriety and consequence of immunity deals given to potential Clinton co-conspirators Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel and possibly others;
- The apparent failure of DOJ to empanel a grand jury to investigate allegations of mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and her associates;
- The Department of State and its employees’ involvement in determining which communications of Secretary Clinton’s and her associates to turn over for public scrutiny;
- WikiLeaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potentially unlawful international dealings;
- Connections between the Clinton campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, and foreign entities, including those from Russia and Ukraine;
- Mr. Comey’s knowledge of the purchase of Uranium One by the company Rosatom, whether the approval of the sale was connected to any donations made to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of that sale that had national security ramifications;
- Disclosures arising from unlawful access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer systems, including inappropriate collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign;
- Post-election accusations by the President that he was wiretapped by the previous Administration, and whether Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch had any knowledge of efforts made by any federal agency to unlawfully monitor communications of then-candidate Trump or his associates;
- Selected leaks of classified information related to the unmasking of U.S. person identities incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community, including an assessment of whether anyone in the Obama Administration, including Mr. Comey, Ms. Lynch, Ms. Susan Rice, Ms. Samantha Power, or others, had any knowledge about the “unmasking” of individuals on then candidate-Trump’s campaign team, transition team, or both;
- Admitted leaks by Mr. Comey to Columbia University law professor, Daniel Richman, regarding conversations between Mr. Comey and President Trump, how the leaked information was purposefully released to lead to the appointment of a special counsel, and whether any classified information was included in the now infamous “Comey memos”;
- Mr. Comey’s and the FBI’s apparent reliance on “Fusion GPS” in its investigation of the Trump campaign, including the company’s creation of a “dossier” of information about Mr. Trump, that dossier’s commission and dissemination in the months before and after the 2016 election, whether the FBI paid anyone connected to the dossier, and the intelligence sources of Fusion GPS or any person or company working for Fusion GPS and its affiliates; and
- Any and all potential leaks originated by Mr. Comey and provide to author Michael Schmidt dating back to 1993.
You have the ability now to right the ship for the American people so these investigations may proceed independently and impartially. The American public has a right to know the facts – all of them – surrounding the election and its aftermath. We urge you to appoint a second special counsel to ensure these troubling, unanswered questions are not relegated to the dustbin of history.
U.S. Department of Justice AUSA who Eric Holder let off in 2011 despite possessing child pornography appears to be Arun Rao — a known associate of James Alefantis & Hillary Clinton
A potential direct connection between Barack Obama’s Eric Holder & PizzaGate.
— Thomas Bernpaine (@ThomasBernpaine) November 11, 2016
Arun Rao’s posts on Instagram to James Alefantis were archived & documented at the time.
Editor’s NOTE: Whether Arun Rao turns out to in fact be this individual or not & there is a possibility he is — it is important to also remember that Eric Holder’s Department of Justice had protected federal employees & public servants despite their engagement in criminal activity. The same criminal activity as described in PizzaGate.
“Am I My Brother’s Keeper?”
In the position of he my Father said
“…was a murderer from the Beginning…”
Cain who by killing Abel became
“…the god of Death…”
Cain is called by the Egyptians “Osiris”,
and Eve his mother is named by another name them as his wife:
ISIS the Whore
who was Unknown until this Last Day
It is She as the one “no one seeth”, as having the name written on the Forehead of that Great City,
which is Sodom and Egypt:
Babylon the Great
“..There is perhaps another reason we are witnessing so much pain in the world today – from shootings to corruption in high places. The entire species is deeply into a transition period from a fear-based world to a love-based one. It was in the prophecies of many indigenous people and now we are here. During this time, Babylon – the exploitive, greed-based, unconscious 5000-year-old system that has spread across the planet – is now both being revealed and trembling on the verge of collapse – environmentally, socially, financially, spiritually. Apocalypse means “revealed from behind the veil.”
As this takes place there will be several responses. To the fear-based among us, it will drive them into denial via shopping, media addiction, drugs, alcohol, incessant busyness. To the greed-based, they will use the “corrupt open door” to enrich themselves, at least in Babylon’s terms. To the mean-spirited and deeply troubled, driven crazy by the coming collapse, they will strike out in violence towards themselves, family and friends, and strangers. To those remembering their own and all others Divinity, it will push them too – to be loving, forgiving, centered, trusting in our Creator, and calm in the face of chaos. Breath deeply. It’s going be a rough landing…”.
Goddess of Night
Like the past Presidents we now see Hillary as the High Priestess of Human Sacrifice like Queen Jezebel of Old
The Coming Judgment of the
Queen of the Night
“…The Bohemian Grove club might be infamously male only, but temporary exceptions have been made for women before, and if the Grovers decide it is in their interest to ordain Hillary as the next President then they will bend their rules to let her in. ..”
The Lover of Money
In the Egyptian Mysteries this fact was represented as the Golden Phallus of Osiris
“..When this happens, expect to see the mainstream press turn against Hillary’s political rivals even more viciously. …”
Hillary on the Global Stage stands as The High Priestess for the White Goddess, the Lover of Money, holding her Scepter “the Root of all Evil” as married to Bill Clinton.
“..The elites will have spoken and the mainstream media will begin marching to the beat of the global elite, maintaining their interests, and destroying the chances of anyone or anything they see as a threat to their corrupt, elite club…”
standing as the High Priest of Mammon, but as a Fallen King of America as the Third Israel he represents a fallen Adam with Hillart the former First Lady really representing Eve as ISIS herself, the Queen of Darkness.
As Hillary really crowned herself, just like Napoleon did.
The Invisible Hand of “market forces”:
and the Revealed Hand of God
The Golden Cage of Babylon
It is the fact that the proverbial “Day of the Lord” is that one, unexpectedly coming as “a Thief in the Night”: and happens to Arrive as the Wrath of God and the Lamb for the 1%.
Actually, it’s due to the Elites here in the West, they who were abundantly filled with lots of Wealth, high Prestige, and political Influence, who then took all they had been given to use against America itself….who betrayed their own Nation, and the American people: indeed these “cardboard Christians”, who decided to gleefully oppress the Poor and Downtrodden, are exactly the ones who precipitated, by their own actions and decisions: the Day of Judgment.
Where did it start???
At the Dirksen Building in Washington DC
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution
prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion .
Lindsey Graham and those Sun Myung Moon bought with his millions
all betrayed the Constitution,
and broke their Oaths of Office:
Thus began the GOP slide into Fascism,
and the advent of the Tea Party,
and their unfettered Racism and hatred of Barack Hussein Obama;
Spiritually Blessed by my Father Jesus as the leader of the Free World as the Global Abel,
and the one my Father had me anoint king of the Third Israel on January 21, 2013, in Washington DC
And their coming Destruction is long overdue, the Just Vengeance at the Hand of my Father Jesus, as Christ Almighty …… It is I who tell the people of this Nation and he entire World what will unfold at His return; as the New Lord God over the New Creation itself, of the New Heaven and the New Earth….
It has arrived….like fog…on little cat feet. It happened when the 1% locked the Gate to keep all the rest of America out…but now they will discover…that what they shut is the Gate on the Golden Cage of Babylon itself……..and it is not We, The People who are locked out: but they: who are now locked in…perfect, actually. They have proved how utterly dispensable they are; and my Father Jesus agrees.
It’s their Judgment Day
Indeed one might well ask: how can Day appear in the Night and not be seen?
Because the day dawns Black over the prophets.
This is a point where the hand of God intervenes, because His Creation is itself in danger….but let me untypically begin where this actually starts to become unwound, as the Story itself, that single Thread of the Narrative that ties the entire Book of Life of the Lamb together.
But first, the Context, as the Frame of Reference.
When one begins the task of explaining how the Lord engineered the destruction of those who dug a huge hole for everyone to fall into, and somehow ended up there themselves, we would have to offer some examples which impinge upon the scenario unfolding around us in our recent lives everyday: if you know what you are looking at.
The Gospel mentions these incidents with clear and transparent imagery: what it doesn’t give us is the Scale, the proportionate size of the Events.
So let me help by supplying some Perspective, which some even call Wisdom.
It’s found at Luke 12:15-21, to wit;
15 And he said unto them,
“…Take heed , and beware of covetousness: f
or a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth . ….”
The Parable of an Unexpected and Sudden Occurrence
16 And he spake a parable unto them, saying ,
“…The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully :
17 And he thought within himself, saying ,
…What shall I do , because I have no room where to bestow my fruits?…”
18 And he said ,
“…This will I do : I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods.
19 And I will say to my soul,
“…Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease , eat , drink , and be merry… .”
20 But God said unto him,
“……Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee:
then whose shall those things be , which thou hast provided ? …”
21 So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God….”Now for some this is just another one of my Father’s many pious admonitions, set in some imaginary time, with some metaphorical abstract exemplar colored in us our greedy Epicurean Rich Man.
Just some good, rather trite, philosophically-tinged advice, nothing more. But that ends up being exactly what this isn’t: it’s prophecy: and a telling one.
The Present Day ScenarioFor those who have some interest in the current of affairs in the world it is not a surprise that we are now all a witness: to the strangest economic manifestation ever seen, as we watch the collapse of Capitalist Society. The 1% have now effectively won the global game of Monopoly. All the money and wealth of the entire world are concentrated in the hands of roughly 200 families. The 99% have been effectively reduced to the status of expendable serfs. People speak of the Gilded Age, but our context is closer to the Dark Ages, when Feudalism was in full display, oats to fealty to the local overlord, each set having their demesne, in the local playground centered around each High Castle; rather like our various corporate entities, with their small ruling assigned caste of lords and ladies as corporate management: and a large class of serfs and servants, with some fawning artisans and beholden merchants in the cities, begging for patronage from their societal betters. We have today the new version of Corporate Feudalism with our Techno-serfs. And we have our sales yeoman, our support staff, as foot-soldiers, and all the rest: of the slaves. They are, in fact, chained to a computer, just as effectively as any Roman Galley slave chained who was for life to his daily beast of an oar. The difference is we get to drive back and forth 5 days a week for the privilege. In short we have become reduced to a precarious and evermore-impossibly tilted playing field; where all those with their inherited wealth who own most of the worlds resources have now decided to have those who earn a dollar for a ten hour day to be their new slaves: thus the US worker is superfluous; none are needed. Too expensive. But how does this fit with the parable? Where and at what point does the “visitor” arrive for the Soul of the Rich Man? Death (More to come….)