The Blue Star of the Hopi; and the 7 Years of the Regeneration

The Archetypal Child: and the Rebellion of The European Masses, part IV in “The Death of the House of Saud”: the Fall of the Sunni and the Rise of the Shia at the Final Division in Palestine | Measure 144 ~ Missive #333⊗ | ⊕~ * ~⊕

“…And a Little Child shall lead Them…”

========================================

Greta Thunberg

We have come to a defining moment in the further ascendance of the Human Race, which has only come about by transcending obstacles; first mentally, as in theory or possibility: and then physically…

The 3 Upper Hells joined to the 3 Lower Heavens as Marriage of Heaven and Hell

“…Yet while there is Still Time…”

 

Now we have this stunning child who delivers this stern lecture, a fitting rebuke to the inaction of the nations going forward to the nations collective internationally agreed upon doom, so totally absurd because it is so absolutely and completely avoidable, especially seeing who the major polluters are, the corporate financial powers literally fiddling with the Fate of all life on earth in the rigged game of the Stock Market, the Great Whore Herself of Laissez-faire Capitalism: while all around them the world is starting to burn….. 

Can we really stand idly by and watch this Ecocide…the death of our entire planetary Biosphere on and by which we live………and continue to do nothing….???

At some point we shall find that the maternal aspect of compassion and mercy that is missing from our world almost entirely will have to reassert itself and complete the redemption of our souls that the Elite have entirely repudiated in favor of total totalitarian dominance over the entire Earth and the human race itself,

 

The Offspring of David: the Preexistent One

 

This young 15 year old girl really represents our own angelic nature itself…. for our Original Nature can be nothing other than the Primal Child that is neither male nor female; the Bornless One of the Lotus, the Archetypal Child is that Star that exists in every relationship or marriage intrinsically: alive in potential before the Act of Love by the parents gives it a sex as either male or female in it’s conception.

We have created a fictitious utopia which resembles the bright nightmare of a world built entirely on lies and deception; one in which the immense suffering and violence enacted in America against it’s own citizens is only a further sign of what our military forces and the predatory capitalism we have them enforce and sustain is doing to the rest of the world….

The Forgotten Vision

 

….Sedating Ophelia by Scott Affleck…

 

========================================================

Hadith attributed to Muhammad give many signs of the appearance of the Dajjal

========================================================

The One-eyed Dajjal of Yemen

===++=========

Wahabism Barbarism

=======++=====

Dajjāl (Arabic: دجال) is an adjective oSyriac origin.[1]

It is also a common Arabic superlative form of the root word dajl meaning “lie” or “deception“.[2]

Al-Masīḥ ad-Dajjāl, with the definite article al- (“the”), refers to “the deceiving Messiah“, a specific end times deceiver.

The One-eyed Dajjal was Laden senior…a one-eyed bricklayer from Yemen who had 12 sons, and became a billionaire in Arabia….

One of his sons was named Osama bin Laden… son of Laden…  Al-Masīḥ ad-Dajjāl = The Son of the Devil…”

As the hadith of Mohammed once said.

 

…9/10’s of all the evil in the world will come out of Yemen at the End…

 

The family of Laden was this evil….and their son: the son of Perdition; Osama bin Laden…Global Terrorist...but the Crown Prince proceeded without the Irfan ( Gnosis )….and began his hideous genocide in Yemen based on his ignorance that the Messenger Mohammed was speaking of Osama bin Laden and his father at the End in the Last Days……. the One-Eyed Dajjal and his son the Son of Perdition were well ensconced in Arabic politics by this time…as with Wahabism and all the rest

Osama bin Laden was quite aware that John Brennan signed all the passports for the Saudi nationals to gain entry into the US…and John  Brennan did this in a visit to see the King of Arabia,  so that these men could come to America and take flight lessons… and then proceed with the Plan…George Bush’s Reichstag Fire…

 

“The Dajjāl is an evil being who will seek to impersonate the true Messiah.”

The name Dajjal also is rooted in an Arabic word dajel,

which means “to gold plate” or “to coat in gold”.

It is derived from word meaning “to mix”.

Image result for trump gold room

The Worship of the Image of the Beast….

………now seen in the fulfillment of the Revelation of my Father Jesus

“…The actual danger of the Al-Masih ad-Dajjal is that he will appear to be righteous, an honest man of the people

…..but this will be false….as is his constant dissembling to cunningly project a false appearance;

a smiling and confidant one very much at odds with his insecure and fear-conditioned reality…..”

============================================================================

 

It is said that he will “wrap” himself or “coat” himself in gold….

 

Image result for Trump Midas image

=============================================

Here are five ways in which President Trump has conducted himself

like the leader of a corrupt banana republic.

===================================

 

1. Relentless Demonizing of the Press

In a democratic republic, the press is meant to serve as an aggressive watchdog—and most U.S. presidents have understood that, even when they felt the press was being unfair. President Barack Obama was visibly annoyed at Fox News at times, but he respected their 1st Amendment rights and realized that he wasn’t exempt from the media’s scrutiny. Trump, however, has repeatedly denounced the press as the energy of the people—even when CNN reporters were receiving death threats, even after the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

CNN reporter Jim Acosta, whose White House press credentials were revoked after the midterms, never received death threats before Trump’s presidency—now, Acosta has noted, he receives them regularly.

2. Undermining a Federal Criminal Investigation

In democracies, even sitting presidents are not exempt from the rule of law—which is why President Richard Nixon probably would have been removed from office via the impeachment process had he not resigned on August 8, 1974 (Trump faced articles of impeachment in the House of Representatives, but he stepped down before a Senate trial could come about).

Trump, however, views himself as exempt from the scrutiny of the U.S. Justice Department.

Furious with Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia-related investigation, Trump fired him after the 2018 midterms and replaced him with loyalist Matt Whitaker—who just happens to be an outspoken opponent of the investigation. This is very much the type of corrupt behavior one would expect from the leader of a banana republic.

3. Interference with Election Results and Voting Rights

Trump not only promotes blatant voter suppression in predominantly non-white areas that are more favorable to Democrats than Republicans—he also favors voiding election results that he disagrees with. Requesting a recount is perfectly legitimate; in the 2018 Florida Senate race, Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson wouldn’t concede to Gov. Rick Scott without a recount.

But when the recount showed a narrow victory for Scott, Nelson conceded defeat. Trump, however, wanted to throw out the election results in the 2018 Arizona Senate race when Democrat Kyrsten Sinema narrowly pulled ahead of Republican Martha McSally.

On November 8, Trump tweeted, “Just out — in Arizona, SIGNATURES DON’T MATCH. Electoral corruption – Call for a new Election? We must protect our Democracy!” There was no evidence whatsoever that Sinema’s supporters had committed any type of voter fraud; regardless, Trump went way beyond asking for a recount—he wanted a “new election.”

But McSally, to her credit, rejected Trump’s conspiracy theory nonsense and eventually conceded to Sinema.

4. Pardoning Cronies, However Egregious Their Actions

In Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio (an outspoken Trump supporter) conducted himself like a dictator or an authoritarian rather than a democratically elected law enforcement official. But the system of checks and balances worked when Arpaio lost a bid for reelection and faced misdemeanor contempt of court charges for refusing to comply with a judge’s orders to cease traffic stops that specifically targeted Latino drivers. Arpaio faced up to half a year in jail, but he was spared incarceration when Trump gave him a presidential pardon in 2017. Chiraag Bains, a senior fellow at Harvard Law School’s Criminal Justice Policy Program, asserted that Trump’s pardon of Arpaio was disturbing not only because it was anendorsement of racism,” but also, because it “reflects Trump’s deep disdain for the judiciary and its role in our system of checks and balances.”

5. Shameless Monetization of the Presidency

When Trump was campaigning for president in 2016, he promised that there would be a strict separation of his business interests and his political activity. But not unlike a family dynasty in a banana republic—for example, the Somoza family in Nicaragua—the Trump family has monetized the White House.

Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, were appointed atop White House aides. And in July 2017, Mother Jones noted that neither of them had fully divested from their real estate holdings.

Not only has President Trump failed to “drain the swamp”—he has made it much more toxic.

 

Related image

Statement from Washington Post Publisher and CEO Fred Ryan in response to President Trump’s statement today regarding the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

Image may contain: text

No automatic alt text available.

Yemen, Al-Masih ad-Dajjal and the Matter of the House of Saud

In an interview with Chris Wallace for Fox News Sunday, the president went after retired AdmWilliam H. McRaven, who oversaw the capture of Saddam Hussein and the killing of Osama bin Laden during his near-40 years in the U.S. military. Questioning Trump’s attacks on the press, Wallace brought up McRaven, who wrote in an op-ed this summer that the president’s description of the media as the “enemy of the people” was the greatest threat to American democracy he had ever witnessed.

At the first mention of the retired Navy SEAL and Special Operations commander, Trump immediately blurted out, in some kind of Pavlovian response, “Hillary Clinton fan,” and later described McRaven as an “Obama backer.”

 

……………………………………………………………………Fascism Arrives in the USA………………………………………………………………

“Ye cannot serve both God and Mammon”

There is little doubt that the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman indeed had Jamal Khashoggi killed, and that he is without any doubt a tyrant, even torturing 8 female dissidents in prison for teaching women to drive in the last few months...

It is of the actions such people that the Seal of the prophets Muhammad once spoke:
“… Islam came as a stranger into this world: and it will depart as one…”
Indeed it is this second part of “.. it will depart as one….” hadith  that is just bringing into focus the falling away the Jâhiliyya as the decline in Islam; the losing of the blessing of God, that is the cause of the world’s troubles at this point with Islam: that and the fact that the US military is fighting for the continued hegemony of the petrodollar, is trying to  have it eternally remain the world Reserve Currency when it’s obvious it cannot for very much longer hold on to this position …… no matter how many wars the Pentagon starts.
But Crown Prince Salman is going even farther by denying the Shia of Iran the right of the Haj to Mecca: this is  his own apostasy…arrogance in National Act of Takfir, Salman’s faithless act of Irreligious Excommunication, cutting off of the entire Nation of Iran, from Mecca
In Islam, the practice of takfir, or excommunication, is theologically perilous.
“If a man says to his brother, ‘You are an infidel,’ ” the Prophet said, “then one of them is right.”
If the accuser is wrong, he himself has committed apostasy by making a false accusation. The punishment for apostasy is death. And yet Osama bin Laden’s successor Zarqawi heedlessly expanded the range of behavior that could make Muslims infidels.

The following signs are ascribed to Ali in the coming of Dajjal

People will stop offering the prayers

Dishonesty will be the way of life

Falsehood will become a virtue

People will mortgage their faith for worldly gain

Usury and bribery will become legitimate

There will be acute famine at the time

There will be no shame amongst people

Many people will worship Satan

There will be no respect for elderly people

People will start killing each other without any good reason

The troubles are further seen in what is known as the Religions all becoming hypocritical bastions of Oppression and Repression; being corrupted by those who use these outmoded Systems of Belief as political Tools of Mass Psychological Control; producing a global “falling away” in all the Nations into the Secular Rule of Free Market Capitalism.
This phenomena as of Islamic Jâhiliyya Christian Decline and Judaisms Neo Nazi Zionism are spoken of in II Thessalonians,  in describing the subtle apostasy that the three Monotheistic religions descend into, embracing a barbaric and heavily politicized literalism; a blind holding on to shallow reductionist fundamentals from the past in the hopes of escaping condemnation for abandoning the Faith internally at the incoming Last Judgment
Indeed we cam now bear witness as the congregations of fallen Christianity, fallen Islam and fallen Judaism are indeed hiding in the rocks and the valleys of their Scriptures as the relics of their calcified Faith; these books as the objects of the Faith and the sayings within made into simplistic slogans and battle cries as taking refuge in mountains of Orthodoxy tocover them due to their horrific ignorance of God, seen in their atrocities and genocides in the name of their False God of Ignorance

 

Voltaire and the Lessons of History

“…Those who can get you to believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities,,,..”

Voltaire

This rank fundamentalism which sprang up in the South like some poisonous mushroom is an ignorant literalism of no prophetic value; those determined Antichristian reasoners of such intellectual abortions as trying to teach children that the Earth is only 6000 years old, or with preposterous statements worthy of the Taliban as of those Southern fundamentalists in America who insist that there were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark !!!
This is matched by the profound ignorance found in Islam where the holders of Mecca and Medina are now refusing the Hajj tushiya and anybody else they have decided to dispossess; all the while starving to death other Muslims in Yemen for reasons that are murky at best….
And then of course we have the rulers of Israel who decided that being a Nazi is okay as long as you’re killing Palestinians
As the messenger Paul the Apostle said
“…For the word in its letter is death: but in it’s spirit is life…”
This was done in his rebuke to literalism, as an approach to the Scripture that was fundamentally ignorant in trying to reduce something to a simplification which proves only to betray it’s real meaning..
Thus these men worship not God…but Death… as of a Cult of Death whose dogma is of the Dead,,,.
But as Albert Einstein quite well said:
“…. Everything is as simple as it is:…. but not simpler …”
An observation which can also be applied to the Gospel and other written works, which cannot be reduced into spiritual pablum or taken and then watered down into universal tapioca, at least not for very long

Image result for TRUMP Cult

“….. Al-Masih ad-Dajjal shall Spend his Time tempting people to follow his false religion…”

Image result for TRUMP Cult

Signs of coming of Al-Masih ad-Dajjal

The Seal of the Prophets had said that the False Savior would travel the whole world, entering every city except Mecca and Medina 

The Messenger Muhammad is also reported to have exhorted his supporters to recite the first and last ten verses oSura Al-Kahf (chapter 18 in the Qur’an), as protection from the trials and mischief of the Dajjal.

What is the real meaning of this saying as of the real sign that “they will be killing each other for NO GOOD REASON…”.

 

 

While the specific claims made by the source in the report have yet to be independently confirmed by other news outlets, the details align with previous extensive reporting on the Khashoggi scandal and the ensuing “damage control” efforts carried out by the Saudi regime.

According to Middle East Eye, the plan to shield the crown prince encompasses several steps, including an option to blame Khashoggi’s murder “on an innocent member of the ruling al-Saud family in order to insulate those at the very top.”

 

The response of the Trump White House in the aftermath of Khashoggi’s murder has brought increased attention to Trump’s business ties to Saudi Arabia, the close relationship between Jared Kushner and the crown prince, and other potential conflicts of interest that could explain the administration’s motivation to provide cover to the Saudi regime.

Of particular interest is a $110 million payment that Saudi Arabia made to the U.S. government on the same day that Pompeo arrived in the Gulf kingdom. That’s the same amount of money that was previously promised to the Trump administration to support its stabilization efforts in Syria.

White House officials have insisted the timing of the payment was mere coincidence, but many Middle Eastern experts are skeptical.

“In all probability, the Saudis want Trump to know that his cooperation in covering for the Khashoggi affair is important to the Saudi monarch,” Joshua Landis, director of the University of Oklahoma’s Center of Middle East Studiestold the Washington Post. “Much of its financial promises to the U.S. will be contingent on this cooperation.”

Others offered even more blunt assessments. “The timing of this is no coincidence,” said one U.S. official involved in Syria policy.

Complicating matters even further are Trump’s personal financial interests in Saudi Arabia. Despite his denials when questioned in the aftermath of Khashoggi’s killing, Trump has previously bragged about how much money he’s made from Saudi investors, and these profits have only increased since his election.

According to a Washington Post report, Trump Hotels in New York and Chicago have seen a huge influx of Saudi cash in recent months, giving Trump yet another reason to cozy up to the royal family — and possibly even enough motivation to help them cover up a murder.

More than six weeks after Khashoggi was brutally murdered for his work as a journalist, new questions continue to arise about his killing and the events that took place afterward. But while we don’t know the full story yet, one thing is clear: If the effort to cover up Khashoggi’s murder was designed to make the scandal go away, it couldn’t possibly have backfired in a bigger way.

 

Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammad bin Salman speaks during the second day of ‘The Future Investment Initiative also known as an annual investment forum ‘Davos in the Desert’ on October 24, 2018 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

 

 

Dozens of princes and cousins from powerful branches of the Al Saud family want to see a change in the line of succession but would not act while King Salman – the crown princes 82-year-old father – is still alive, the sources said.

They recognize that the king is unlikely to turn against his favorite son, known in the West as MbS.

Rather, they are discussing the possibility with other family members that after the king’s death, Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz, 76, a younger full brother of King Salman and uncle of the crown prince, could take the throne, according to the sources.

 

The Image of the Beast: Trump and the Shadow of Hitler

 

Related image

Present Trump Iconography

The Man of Lawlessness

Amid international uproar over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, some members of Saudi Arabia’s ruling family are agitating to prevent Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman from becoming king, three sources close to the royal court said.

Dozens of princes and cousins from powerful branches of the Al Saud family want to see a change in the line of succession but would not act while King Salman – the crown prince’s 82-year-old father – is still alive, the sources said. They recognize that the king is unlikely to turn against his favorite son, known in the West as MbS.

Rather, they are discussing the possibility with other family members that after the king’s death, Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz, 76, a younger full brother of King Salman and uncle of the crown prince, could take the throne, according to the sources.

Prince Ahmed, King Salman’s only surviving full brother, would have the support of family members, the security apparatus and some Western powers, one of the Saudi sources said.

Hadley Gamble on Saudi Arabia and Jamal Khashoggi’s death Hadley Gamble on Saudi Arabia and Jamal Khashoggi’s death

Prince Ahmed returned to Riyadh in October after 2-1/2 months abroad. During the trip, he appeared to criticize the Saudi leadership while responding to protesters outside a London residence chanting for the downfall of the Al Saud dynasty.

He was one of only three people on the Allegiance Council, made up of the ruling family’s senior members, who opposed MbS becoming crown prince in 2017, two Saudi sources said at the time.

Neither Prince Ahmed nor his representatives could be reached for comment. Officials in Riyadh did not immediately respond to requests from Reuters for comment on succession issues.

The House of Saud is made up of hundreds of princes. Unlike typical European monarchies, there is no automatic succession from father to eldest son. Instead the kingdoms tribal traditions dictate that the king and senior family members from each branch select the heir they consider fittest to lead.

Senior U.S. officials have indicated to Saudi advisers in recent weeks that they would support Prince Ahmed, who was deputy interior minister for nearly 40 years, as a potential successor, according to Saudi sources with direct knowledge of the consultations.

These Saudi sources said they were confident that Prince Ahmed would not change or reverse any of the social or economic reforms enacted by MbS, would honor existing military procurement contracts and would restore the unity of the family.

One senior U.S. official said the White House is in no hurry to distance itself from the crown prince despite pressure from lawmakers and the CIAs assessment that MbS ordered Khashoggis murder, though that could change once Trump gets a definitive report on the killing from the intelligence community.

The official also said the White House saw it as noteworthy that King Salman seemed to stand by his son in a speech in Riyadh on Monday and made no direct reference to Khashoggi’s killing, except to praise the Saudi public prosecutor.

The White House declined to comment.

The Saudi sources said U.S. officials had cooled on MbS not only because of his suspected role in the murder of Khashoggi. They are also rankled because the crown prince recently urged the Saudi defense ministry to explore alternative weapons supplies from Russia, the sources said.

In a letter dated May 15, seen by Reuters, the crown prince requested that the defense ministry “focus on purchasing weapon systems and equipment in the most pressing fields” and get training on them, including the Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile system.

Neither the Russian defense ministry nor officials in Riyadh immediately responded to Reuters requests for comment.

Image may contain: one or more people

U.S. ROLE KEY

The brutal killing of Khashoggi, a prominent critic of the crown prince, in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last month has drawn global condemnation, including from many politicians and officials in the United States, a key Saudi ally. The CIA believes the crown prince ordered the killing, according to U.S. sources familiar with the assessment.

Saudi Arabia’s public prosecutor has said the crown prince knew nothing of the killing.

The international uproar has piled pressure on a royal court already divided over 33-year-old Prince Mohammed’s rapid rise to power. Since his ascension, the prince has gained popular support with high-profile social and economic reforms including ending a ban on women driving and opening cinemas in the conservative kingdom.

His reforms have been accompanied by a crackdown on dissent, a purge of top royals and businessmen on corruption charges, and a costly war in Yemen.

He has also marginalized senior members of the royal family and consolidated control over Saudis security and intelligence agencies.

He first ousted then-powerful crown prince and interior minister Mohammed bin Nayef (MbN), 59, in June 2017. Then he removed Prince Miteb bin Abdullah, 65, son of the late King Abdullah, as head of the National Guard and detained him as part of an anti-corruption campaign.

People will carry on regardless of CIA Saudi Arabia report, says pro

Some 30 other princes were also arrested, mistreated, humiliated and stripped of their wealth, even as MbS splashed out on palaces, a $500 million yacht, and set a new record in the international art market with the purchase of a painting by Italian Renaissance engineer and painter Leonardo Da Vinci.

The entire House of Saud has emerged weakened as a result.

According to one well-placed Saudi source, many princes from senior circles in the family believe a change in the line of succession “would not provoke any resistance from the security or intelligence bodies he controls” because of their loyalty to the wider family.

“They (the security apparatus) will follow any consensus reached by the family.”

Officials in Riyadh did not respond to a request for comment.

The United States, a key ally in economic and security terms, is likely to be a determining factor in how matters unfold in Saudi Arabia, the Saudi sources and diplomats say.

President Donald Trump on Saturday called the CIA assessment that MbS ordered Khashoggi’s killing “very premature” but “possible”, and said he would receive a complete report on the case on Tuesday.

Trump and his son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner have cultivated deep personal relationships with the crown prince. One Saudi insider said MbS feels he still has their support and is willing to “roll some heads to appease the U.S.”

But Trump and top administration officials have said Saudi officials should be held to account for any involvement in Khashoggis death and have imposed sanctions on 17 Saudis for their alleged role including one of MbS’s closest aides.

U.S. lawmakers are meanwhile pushing legislation to punish Riyadh for the killing, and both Republican and Democratic senators have urged Trump to get tough on the crown prince.

King Salman, 82, is aware of the consequences of a major clash with the United States and the possibility that Congress could try to freeze Saudi assets.

Those who have met the king recently say he appeared to be in denial about the role of MbS in what happened, believing there to be a conspiracy against the kingdom. But they added that he looked burdened and worried.

ALLEGIANCE COUNCIL
When the king dies or is no longer be able to rule, the 34-member Allegiance Council, a body representing each line of the ruling family to lend legitimacy to succession decisions, would not automatically declare MbS the new king.

Even as crown prince, MbS would still need the council to ratify his ascension, one of the three Saudi sources said. While the council accepted King Salman’s wish to make MbS crown prince, it would not necessarily accept MbS becoming king when his father dies, especially given that he sought to marginalise council members.

Officials in Riyadh did not respond to a request for comment.

The Saudi sources say MbS has destroyed the institutional pillars of nearly a century of Al Saud rule: the family, the clerics, the tribes and the merchant families. They say this is seen inside the family as destabilising.

Despite the controversy over Khashoggi’s killing, MbS is continuing to pursue his agenda.

Some insiders believe he built his father a new but remote Red Sea palace in Sharma, at the Neom City development site — thrown up in a record one year at a cost of $2 billion — as a gilded cage for his retirement.

The site is isolated, the closest city of Tabouk more than 100 km (60 miles) away. Residence there would keep the king out of the loop on most affairs of state, one of the sources close to the royal family said.

Officials in Riyadh did not respond to a request for comment.

Advertisements

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God | Measure 144 / Missive #333 ~⊕~ * ~⊕~

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

Leader of Our Republic: the Moral Compass in the Hand of Bernie Sanders…

“….Today I spoke at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies about the problem of authoritarian nationalism threatening democratic societies, and the need to build a global progressive movement based on the principles of democracy, equality, and economic and environmental justice. I hope you’ll give my speech a listen and join me in the movement that stands behind a vision of shared prosperity, security and dignity for all people….”

============================

============================ 

Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

==========================================

“….What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process.

What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. ….”

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  

His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license

 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

 

 

Image may contain: 1 person, suit and text

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

==========================================

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

…I am black, but comely…..”

“…But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

=========================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said”

“Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life

and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange

that these same men treat human life

like the cheapest and most disposable resource

on the face of the Earth???”

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

 Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process. What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. 

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

Image result for cartoon

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

=======================================================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said “Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange that these same men treat human life like the cheapest and most disposable resource on the face of the Earth???”

 

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

The Prophetic Context of the Trumpist Policy: National Racism at the Level of an Institutionalized Agenda: a Review of White Supremacy; and a Vision of What Will Now Come to Pass

The Thief in the Night:

How the Day of Reckoning Arrived Unseen and Unknown

Exodus 1:7-16 King James Version (KJV)

And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them.

Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.

And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we:

10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.

11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

12 But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew. And they were grieved because of the children of Israel.

13 And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour:

14 And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in morter, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field: all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour.

15 And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah:

16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

 

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Image result for david duke

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s monologue some weeks back about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the full blown endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisteupon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

 

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisteupon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.
White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Image result for eli eli lema sabachthani

As one German social Darwinist and eugenicist expressed it,

‘It was Weismann’s teaching regarding the separation of the germ plasm from the soma, the hereditary stuff from the body of the individual, that first allowed us to recognize the importance of Darwin’s principle of selection. Only then did we comprehend that it is impossible to improve our progeny’s condition by means of physical and mental training. Apart from the direct manipulation of the nucleus, only selection can preserve and improve the race.’

Indeed, for those who accepted Weismann’s views with respect to both heredity and the ‘all-supremacy’ of selection, eugenics was the only practical strategy to ensure racial progress and avert racial decline.
If the ideas of Haeckel and Weismann encouraged many contemporaries to view natural selection as the sole agent of all organic and social progress, the writings of the two biologists also emphasized that progress was not inevitable.
Under certain conditions the ‘unfit‘ might prosper, thereby posing a challenge to further evolutionary development.
This ‘selectionist’ perspective and language provided Germany’s future eugenicists with novel tools of analysis that enabled them to come to grips with the ‘social question’ by transforming it into a scientific problem: the asocial individuals created by industrialization became for them the biologically and medically unfit.
The only way to eliminate this group from the population was through a policy of “
‘rational selection,’ or race hygiene.
The significance of the three contexts is nowhere more clearly visible than in the intellectual backgrounds and early writings of Alfred Ploetz and Wilhelm Schallmayer.
Working largely independently of one another during the early of the movement (1890-1903), both men laid the foundations for the future course of race hygiene in their country.

Ploetz’s organizational talents and charismatic personality allowed him to create the institutional basis for the young movement almost single-handedly.

Alfred Ploetz

Alfred Ploetz (August 22, 1860 – March 20, 1940) was a German physician, biologist, eugenicist known for coining the term ‘Rassenhygiene’ (racial hygiene), and promoting the concept in Germany. ‘Rassenhygiene’ is a form of eugenics. Ploetz first proposed the theory of racial hygiene (race-based eugenics) in his “Racial Hygiene Basics” (Grundlinien einer Rassenhygiene) in 1895. In 1904 Ploetz founded the periodical “Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie” with Fritz Lenz as chief editor, and in 1905 the German Society for Racial Hygiene (De Berliner Gesellschaft fur Rassenhygiene) with 31 members. page In 1907 the society became the “International Society for Racial Hygiene”. In 1930 he became an honorary doctor of the University of Munich. Ploetz was a supporter of the National Socialist Party, which took power in 1933. Ploetz wrote in April 1933 that he believed Adolf Hitler would bring racial hygiene from its previous marginality into the mainstream. In 1933 Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick established an “expert advisory committee for population and racial policy,” which included Ploetz, Fritz Lenz, Ernst Rüdin and Hans F.K. Günther. This expert advisory committee had the task of advising the Reich Government on the implementation and enforcement of legislation regarding racial and eugenic issues. In 1936, Hitler appointed Ploetz to a professorship. In 1937 Ploetz joined the National Socialist Party. Along with many other eugenicists in Europe and America, Ploetz believed in the superiority of the Nordic race, and he favored the global dominance of the Aryan race. His writings were a major influence on Völkisch ideology.

 

The 13th sign of the Zodiac--Ophiucus. He's located by Scorpio, in the area known as the DARK RIFT.

The 13th sign of the Zodiac–Ophiuchus. He’s located by Scorpio, in the area known as the DARK RIFT

 – COMMENTARY
27 AUG 2018 AT 13:34 ET    

“While the exaggerator-in-chief is well known for his habitual lying, the most common psychological diagnosis he’s been given by experts in the field is narcissistic personality disorder.

While any diagnosis should require a full mental examination before accepted as clinical truth, the mountains of behavioral evidence for Trump’s narcissism arguably provides more justification for the label than any standard clinical test. At this point, the claim can hardly be debated, and even staunch supporters would admit that Trump thinks he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. It takes a special kind of narcissist to shamelessly compare their book to The Bible in front an audience full of conservatives. His narcissism knows few limits, and it’s hard to imagine even the man himself denying such an obvious fact,,”

 

A National Policy of Institutionalized Racism:

First Written of in Sacred Literature, Began in Ancient Egypt, paralleled in Caste Structure of India

Many medically trained race hygienists argued that the surest way to improve the general level of national health was to upgrade the bodily constitution of all individuals in society – a task to be accomplished by means of an energetic eugenics program.

In addition to the ‘social question’, and the German medical tradition, there was a third influence that greatly shaped the early development of the movement: the “selectionist” variety of social Darwinism, popularized by Germany’s most outspoken biologist, Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919), and later legitimated by the scientific writings of the Freiburg embryologist August Weismann (1834-1914).

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Charles  Darwin ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Ernst Haeckel

Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel (16 February 1834 – 9 August 1919) was a German biologist, naturalist, philosopher, physician, professor, marine biologist, and artist who discovered, described and named thousands of new species, mapped a genealogical tree relating all life forms, and coined many terms in biology, including anthropogeny, ecology, phylum, phylogeny, stem cell, and Protista. Haeckel promoted and popularised Charles Darwin’s work in Germany, and developed the influential recapitulation theory (“ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”) claiming that an individual organism’s biological development, or ontogeny, parallels and summarises its species’ evolutionary development, or phylogeny. The published artwork of Haeckel includes over 100 detailed, multi-colour illustrations of animals and sea creatures (‘Kunstformen der Natur’). As a philosopher, Ernst Haeckel wrote ‘Die Welträtsel’ (1895–1899), the genesis for the term “world riddle” (Welträtsel). Haeckel’s political beliefs were influenced by his affinity for the German Romantic movement, coupled with his acceptance of a form of Lamarckism. Rather than being a strict Darwinian, Haeckel believed that the characteristics of an organism were acquired through interactions with the environment and that ontogeny reflected phylogeny. He believed the social sciences to be instances of “applied biology”, and that phrase was picked up and used in Volkisch philosophy. In 1905, Haeckel founded a group called the Deutscher Monistenbund to promote his religious and political beliefs. This group lasted until 1933 and included such notable members as Wilhelm Ostwald, Georg von Arco, Helene Stöcker and Walter Arthur Berendsohn. Haeckel believed that human races evolved independently, and in parallel with each other. Haeckel divided human beings into ten races, of which the Caucasian (Aryan) was the highest and the primitives were doomed to extinction.

August Weismann
August Friedrich Leopold Weismann (17 January 1834 – 5 November 1914) was a German evolutionary biologist. Ernst Mayr ranked him the second most notable evolutionary theorist of the 19th century, after Charles Darwin. Weismann became the Director of the Zoological Institute and the first Professor of Zoology at Freiburg. His main contribution was the germ plasm theory, at one time also known as ‘Weismannism’, according to which (in a multicellular organism) inheritance only takes place by means of the germ cells – the gametes such as egg cells and sperm cells. Other cells of the body – somatic cells – do not function as agents of heredity.
Haeckel went far beyond Darwin in his attempt to flesh out the larger philosophical and social meaning of the evolutionary theory.
Although, like Darwin, he believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, Haeckel always stressed Darwin’s selection principle as the most important engine of forward directed organic change; indeed, for Haeckel, Darwinism was synonymous with selection.
Weismann, who came to reject the possibility of the inheritance of acquired characteristics through his work on heredity, afforded Darwin’s principle of natural selection an even greater role in organic and social evolution than did the author of the ‘Origin of Species’ himself.
His famous mechanism of heredity, ‘the continuity of the germ plasm‘, first articulated in 1883, challenged the basic tenets of the more optimistic first-generation social Darwinists who assumed that new characteristics acquired by an organism as a result of environmental change would be transmitted to future generations.
As one German social Darwinist and eugenicist expressed it,

It was Weismann’s teaching regarding the separation of the germ plasm from the soma, the hereditary stuff from the body of the individual, that first allowed us to recognize the importance of Darwin’s principle of selection. Only then did we comprehend that it is impossible to improve our progeny’s condition by means of physical and mental training. Apart from the direct manipulation of the nucleus, only selection can preserve and improve the race.

Indeed, for those who accepted Weismann’s views with respect to both heredity and the ‘all-supremacy’ of selection, eugenics was the only practical strategy to ensure racial progress and avert racial decline.
If the ideas of Haeckel and Weismann encouraged many contemporaries to view natural selection as the sole agent of all organic and social progress, the writings of the two biologists also emphasized that progress was not inevitable.
Under certain conditions the ‘unfit‘ might prosper, thereby posing a challenge to further evolutionary development.
This ‘selectionist’ perspective and language provided Germany’s future eugenicists with novel tools of analysis that enabled them to come to grips with the ‘social question’ by transforming it into a scientific problem: the asocial individuals created by industrialization became for them the biologically and medically unfit.
The only way to eliminate this group from the population was through a policy of “
‘rational selection,’ or race hygiene.

 

The Untouchables and The Land of Goshen.

 

 

 

“….When a narcissist’s self-esteem or self-worth is badly injured, their whole identity begins to fall apart, and they often respond with what is referred to asnarcissistic rage.”

When this happens, the lashing out, bullying, threats, and erratic behaviors rise to new levels. Rather than accepting the blame one deserves for their own actions, narcissists tell themselves that others are responsible, and that they deserve to be punished. They often become obsessed with revenge, which comes in many forms, such as verbal or even physical abuse.

Modern technology like social media provides the narcissist with the perfect medium for attacking perceived enemies, and Donald Trump has certainly taken advantage of it.

But his threats have gone beyond personal enemies. When the possibility of impeachment became a reality for the president, his instinct was to tell the world on national television that if such a thing were to happen, it would cause the economy to crash.

“I think everybody would be poor,” he told Fox News last Wednesday, trying to strike fear into the hearts of all Americans.

David Duke and White Genocide

 

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric a few weeks back in her “Rant and Rave Show”got the endorsement of an open white supremacist ( Namely, David Duke…. )

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading to “the collapse of the American family” in June.

…………….……………………Our New Paradigm of the Slow Creeping Cancer of Racism …. as National Policy…………………….

Our Real President….

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.
White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

The Voice in the Wilderness, Sanity in the White House and the Dead Duck of the Trump Presidency: Can the Evangelical South decide the Devil was not their Savior ?? The Last Trump, the Image of the Beast and the Shadow of Hitler | Measure 144 ~MISSIVE Series 333 ~⊕~ INDEX B~⊕~

From the New York Times and “Rocket Man, Nuclear Madness and the Mind of Donald Trump…” by John Gartner

A Voice in the Wilderness ???

“…As we’ve learned from history, a person can be an authoritarian and also a sociopath.   

They actually help each other. Nobody with a conscience could really be a good dictator.

Trump’s spokesman Rudy Giuliani has been doing the media rounds, making threatening remarks about James Comey and  Robert Mueller. This is banana-republic dictator behavior. There is also the memo where Trump’s attorneys argued that he could pardon himself and is a de facto king who is above the law. Given his personality, how does this impact Donald Trump emotionally and cognitively? Is he excited? Titillated?

I think he does feel that way. Giuliani really is his alter ego. This is what he wanted in his spokesman and lawyer. Someone who would just make up vicious lies and just keep slashing and burning and hurling mud and threats, devaluations and false accusations and conspiracies to muddy the waters, to make Trump look like the victim. You’re right, this is not a metaphor. This is organized crime stuff. It is the same psychology where there are all kinds of open extortionist threats

In a move that risks exposing them to even more vicious rants of “fake news” in unhinged presidential tweets, The New York Times today published an anonymous Op-Ed essay from a senior official in the Trump administration who openly admits that he and other ‘like-minded colleagues….have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

The newspaper prefaced the essay with a statement explaining the departure from their usual policy of requiring that the identities all Op-Ed authors to be verified and disclosed.

“The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers,” the paper’s editorial board explained.

The content of the Op-Ed quickly demonstrates why the author requested anonymity and why the White House today must be a hive of whispers and intrigue as the staff tries to determine who is behind the damning content.

 

The author begins his essay with a confirmation of one of the worst take-aways from the portrait of the Trump White House as portrayed in noted journalist Bob Woodward’s new book.

“President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.”

“It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.”

“The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

“I would know. I am one of them.”

An admission like that means that the author is risking not only their job, but potentially their liberty as the notoriously litigious Trump is sure to scream treason in a belligerent tweet as soon as he reads it.

The anonymous source takes pains to differentiate their stance from the typical public notion of the “resistance.”

“To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.”

“But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.”

“That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.”

The Bible and the Mein Kampf in the Red Box

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA to

John Gartner the Author….

‘…Trump’s behavior is either based on a faulty premise or some kind of paranoid conspiracy theory or a denial of reality. On that basis, Dr. Reiss argues that if Trump were a policeman, he would take away his gun. In the book, other contributors such as Dr. Steven Buser and former Gen. William Enyart argue that Trump would not be able to qualify for a security clearance to be a nuclear missile launch officer…”

Dr. Buser argued in a New York Times op-ed that Trump’s behavior and character suggest that he is not stable. Trump is not trustworthy; he’s not of the highest character.

He’s not of the highest honesty. Therefore, Trump would fail to gain the clearance that allows an airman to handle nuclear weapons. He would be disqualified.

Yet this person who is not qualified to even load the bombs onto the planes is the commander in chief and has the unilateral authority for any reason at any time to launch nuclear weapons.

Trump also has a blatant disregard for expert knowledge, which signals to a broader problem with American culture at present and especially to how American conservatives embrace anti-intellectualism. Trump bragged that he would not need to prepare for his meeting with Kim because he works on instinct.

Is Trump even capable of processing the seriousness of his meeting with North Korea’s leader?

No. Trump’s grandiosity is such that he actually believes he is an expert on everything. Based on his speeches and interviews, Trump is apparently the world authority on 25 different issues. This also speaks to a bigger problem, which is the death of expertise. For authoritarians and malignant narcissists like Trump an independent source of authority, whether it’s the press, the bureaucracy or the experts, are threats to his authority. Trump leaves positions at the State Department unfilled because he doesn’t want experts telling him what to do. He knows that he knows more than everybody else. What’s really frightening is that he actually believes that he has this kind of papal infallibility.

How would you explain to Republican leaders and other right-wing elites the seriousness of Trump’s mental and personality issues and the danger he poses to America and the world? 

I truly believe that the elected Republican politicians are completely lost souls. They are like the characters in a zombie movie who keep their father in the basement because they don’t really understand that he is a zombie. He’s not coming back. I really, truly think it’s that bad.

There a few Republicans who are trying to sound the alarm about Trump, but the Republican Party as a whole is like organized crime at this point, and Trump is the boss. There’s absolutely no other conclusion you could draw.

Now today from the White House an Insider breaks Ranks….

“…The author in the Times then explains the source of the problem these rebellious White House insiders see with the president.

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.”

“Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.”

“In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.”

To make it clear that they are not left wing idealogues opposed to the Republican agenda, the author cites their support for deregulation, the repugnant tax breaks for billionaires, and out of control military spending.

However, they cite these “successes” as having been accomplished despite the president’s “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” leadership style.

“From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.”

“Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.”

“’There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,’ a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.”

They then go on to try to reassure the American public that they and their like-minded colleagues are the last bulwark of hope preventing the administration and the country as a whole from descending into chaos, in a somewhat self-serving assessment.

“The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.”

“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.”

They then continue to describe a “two-track presidency” where Trump is advocating practices and policies that would feel right at home in an autocratically-controlled society, while what the right-wing refers to as the “deep state” — rebranded the “steady state” by the author — ignores his rants and maintains a modicum of normalcy.

 

The most shocking revelation contained in the Op-Ed is the admission that even at the beginning of the administration “there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment” to remove the president due to his inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office. Unfortunately, they decided to avoid precipitating a constitutional crisis and simply vowed to do what they could to contain the president’s worst impulses.

The Op-Ed concludes with a lament on the current state of the body politic and a call to the American people to transcend politics to come together.

“The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.”

“Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.”

“We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.”

“There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.”

After a day of labeling all the tales of internal strife in the Oval Office contained in Bob Woodward’s book as lies promulgated by Democratic shills, the White House is sure to label this latest desperate plea from rogue administration officials as “fake news,” and his gullible supporters will continue to place their faith in the false and dangerous quasi-deity that they have transformed him into in their minds.

“….Let’s hope that, whatever their motives, some adults remain in control in the administration,

even after the inevitable purge occurs in the coming days….

Psychologist John Gartner on Trump’s behavior:

“It’s a coup that’s not moving slowly anymore

Former Johns Hopkins professor argues Trump is getting worse, may be “on the boundary of psychosis and reality”

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Fascism Arrives in the USA

I do find myself feeling like, “Dear God, why can these people not see it? And what can we do to open their eyes?” It is like a 1950s or 1960s horror movie where nobody would believe that there was actually a monster that’s about to destroy the town and there are these Cassandra-like figures trying to warn people. But the townspeople remain in denial and they are doomed.

Trump’s political movement meets the criteria for a political cult. You are a psychologist. Is it possible to reach someone who is stuck in Trump’s cult? Why does he have such influence over these people?

It does meet the criteria. You’ve got the charismatic leader, and his followers subsume their identity into his group, which makes them feel larger and more powerful. Once you have that kind of blind belief and loyalty, the leader, as Donald Trump has said, could really shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and nothing would happen. The cognitive dissonance is such that the cult members will rationalize anything. For example, something like 50 percent of Republicans say that if Trump wanted to cancel the 2020 election, that would be fine with them.

Faux News and the White Nationalist Movement of Bannon, Steve Miller, and Don the Con…

Bobby Azarian, Raw Story

 – COMMENTARY
27 AUG 2018 AT 13:34 ET    

“While the exaggerator-in-chief is well known for his habitual lying, the most common psychological diagnosis he’s been given by experts in the field is narcissistic personality disorder.

While any diagnosis should require a full mental examination before accepted as clinical truth, the mountains of behavioral evidence for Trump’s narcissism arguably provides more justification for the label than any standard clinical test. At this point, the claim can hardly be debated, and even staunch supporters would admit that Trump thinks he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. It takes a special kind of narcissist to shamelessly compare their book to The Bible in front an audience full of conservatives. His narcissism knows few limits, and it’s hard to imagine even the man himself denying such an obvious fact,,”

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s monologue some weeks back about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people, she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

“….When a narcissist’s self-esteem or self-worth is badly injured, their whole identity begins to fall apart, and they often respond with what is referred to as “narcissistic rage.”

When this happens, the lashing out, bullying, threats, and erratic behaviors rise to new levels. Rather than accepting the blame one deserves for their own actions, narcissists tell themselves that others are responsible, and that they deserve to be punished. They often become obsessed with revenge, which comes in many forms, such as verbal or even physical abuse.

Modern technology like social media provides the narcissist with the perfect medium for attacking perceived enemies, and Donald Trump has certainly taken advantage of it.

But his threats have gone beyond personal enemies. When the possibility of impeachment became a reality for the president, his instinct was to tell the world on national television that if such a thing were to happen, it would cause the economy to crash.

“I think everybody would be poor,” he told Fox News last Wednesday, trying to strike fear into the hearts of all Americans.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric a few weeks back in her “Rant and Rave Show” got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading to “the collapse of the American family in June.

……………..Our New Paradigm of the Slow Creeping Cancer of Racism …. as National Policy

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Who set Up The Image of the Beast with Donald Trump ?? The JuJu of Omarosa Manigault Newman, the Priestess of the White Crow of Osiris: Jim Crow | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~⊕~ Index A

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

 Who Set Up the Image of the Beast???

Omarosa Manigault Newman

Image result for omarosa manigault

In the Revelation of my Father Jesus, the Lamb’s Book,  it tells in chapter 14 the fate of all those who end up loving and believing a lie: the Image of the Beast representing this very thing; the Image of the Axis Beast of Nazism now Worshiped by all the Southern Racist Reprobate Children of the Father of Lies, Unamerican in their Racism and Bigotry; Antichristian in their Words and their Actions.

They Pride themselves in being the Red “Trump” States of the Original 13 Confederate South who fought in the Civil War against the North.

The Fate they have earned for themselves is unknown to them, because the Day of the Lord…that of the Last Judgment on Judgment Day……comes unheralded into the World. For this reason it is described by both Peter and Paul as ” …. a thief in the Night…”

They who worship Trump are of the Camp of that Racist Strumpet South and her White Jim Crow Lover who now Parades at endless Rallies in the South land and has fundraising Fests  in the Southern White House, is even now preparing to End Free Speech and steal the Midterms if at all possible; with the help from their Russian Hacker friends…prepared to go for all the marbles… and to remove anything which stands in their Golden Calf’s way…

But in this unknown and unseen Day both he and they who worshiped him are delivered to the Lake of Fire, prepared for “All Liars…and Whosoever Maketh or Loveth a Lie….”

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Former Top KGB General Says Trump is a Russian Asset and he Likely Knows it

As Special Counsel Robert Mueller continues his probe into whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to meddle in the 2016 presidential election, a new book is about to be released which claims that Trump has been compromised by Russia for over three decades.
Daily Mail reports that a new book by Craig Unger, entitled ‘House of Trump, House of Putin; the Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia‘, claims that President Trump is and has been a Russian asset since 1987In 1987 Donald Trump travelled to Moscow, and Unger says that the former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, Oleg Kalugin, insists that Trump would have very likely been filmed with prostitutes at that time, saying that Trump had ‘many young ladies at his disposal’ and that Russian spies would have jumped at the opportunity.Kalugin also claims that Trump is an easy ‘Russian asset’ considering how greedy he has been over the years.  He goes as far as saying that Trump is most likely aware of the existence of blackmail material often referred to as ‘kompromat’.

If Russia was likely willing to gather ‘kompromat’ on Trump 31 years ago, it would seem to give further credence to the Steele Dossier which claims that Russia had gathered ‘kompromat’ on Trump back in 2013 as well. 

It’s worth noting that no proof of this blackmail material was provided to Unger by Kalugin — only his opinion on what most

likely would have taken place at the time of Trump’s visit to Moscow.

The book also looks into Trump’s other ties to shady Russian officials and businessmen dating back to the 1970s.  It will be released on August 14th.

———————————————————————————————–

White Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that

“the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore.

Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants

—————————————————————-

KKK-ENDORSED  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS III !!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………………………………………………….”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On

and On….

as also

 

 

 

the narrative in Europe 

 

 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

The Prophetic Truth….

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

 

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

 

 

 

The Coming of the Kingdom and the GOP Nazi “Dog in the Manger”: Southern Antichristianity, the Father of Lies: and the White “Jim Crow” of Donald “J” Trump | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~ ⊕ ~

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

KKK-ENDORSED  !!!  DONALD J TRUMP APPROVED !!!  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS DEMONSTRATED!!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

———————————————————————————————–

Image may contain: 1 person, textWhite Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump is having a meet-and-greet with his constituents. ….. then they’re having a barbecue on the South Lawn ….. no biggie…

The Cross Burning will be the Main Attraction at the close, Jeff Sessions presiding……. the entire GOP will be there…in their white robes of office

—————————————————————-

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………..”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On and On….as also the narrative in Europe 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

“…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

 

 

 

%d bloggers like this: