The New Unification Church

It is here that we started the New Church of New Hope on the web; to Celebrate the 21 years the author spent writing the book “The Revelation of Savation: the Regeneration of John”.

With it’s brother site http://www.myspace.com/theholyunicorns we have something not seen on the web yet; the writing and the music that go with it; the Book and the Song of the Lamb; to fulfill the Prophecy of the Gospel in the Testimony of Jesus in the Revelation: the Sword in the Stone; for the little child who leads us at the end is Arthur; but he rises from the River of Fire in the City of St. Francis like the Phoenix itself.

The Journey To The Restoration of All Things Starting at the AMEN: the First and the Last

The Journey To The Restoration of All Things at the AMEN: the First and the Last

 

Twin Peaks as the First Holy Ground in America

Perspective of the Advent of the Wrath of the Lamb Slain from the Foundation of the World, starting at March 29th, Palm Sunday, 2015, at Sanctuary Church in Pennsylvania at the Confession made to me before the entire Congregation by Hyung Jin Moon of the Mistake of Sun Myung Moon about the True Nature of the Holy Spirit of God as being a Male Spirit, and not a female spirit

 

Now that I have begun to finally the final edit together for my book “A City Not Forsaken: My Generation and the Revelation of Salvation”, I have had quite a time going over the events since 1987 when I was brought out of my city to New Hope by John and his Angel and then began the 21 years of instruction by my guide on the Path sent to me by my Father Jesus that resulted in the book going to print.
 
But that I see clearly why I had to rectify all the mistakes that have been made and elucidate all the factors where no mistake was made that connect Rev. Moon and the events that have swirled around the history of My Generation since the “Flower Children” came to the City of St. Francis the real connection between myself and Rev. Moon must now be seen in it’s true light.
 
The events of which I speak center around the time that John F. Kennedy was killed; 1963 and then shortly after when Rev. Moon arrived in America in 1965.
 
Since no one with either a clue as to what Rev. Moon was really about and none in his church as well seem to have either the critical understanding to really be objective about Rev. Moon who were not in his church at it’s beginning here in America and those who were in it who all have clearly been dwarfed in their response to him and his mission along with what they all could see, especially his clear genius in explaining the Bible of which they have universally shown themselves to be totally unable to place in any objective field by which they could understand what really has been made manifest.
 
Thus they all have left his church and turned on him, or stayed and surprised no one by all falling before even the shadow of his legacy to mankind and the world; crushed by his almost supernatural inspiration and seemingly boundless depth of love and compassion, along with rejection of all manner of accepted dogma cherished by millions of Christians for the last 2,000 years.
For those who believe I am opposed and hostile to Rev. Moon out of hatred or anger of his being someone who speaks of himself in terms of “the Messiah” and he and his wife as “True Parents” or other things they could not be more mistaken; for even though I disagree with Rev. Moon in many general areas and quite a few specific ones I still know from what my Father Jesus’ servant John told me about Rev. Moon that he IS one of the central figures of the Providence of Salvation that we have all been blessed to even know in our century; and that he one of the greatest figures who ever walked on this planet; or who ever lived; when it comes to the story now to be written for all to see and the part he played in the unfolding of Mankind’s divine potential and the cosmic drama involved in mankind reaching it’s original nature; lost since the Fall.
 
The First Mistake: the Judgment by Appearance in the Last Days
As I have told people from the beginning not to Judge Rev. Moon in any way as they all don’t know what they are talking about; and to read things in newspapers or magazines and then to merely label him as a “false prophet” or “antichrist” or a host of the other names in which people mistake opinion about Rev. Moon instead of any personal experience with him shows that all of these accusations that judgmental people and especially judgmental “unchristians” make about him are based upon nothing but supposition and hearsay.
Rev. Moon is none of those things they say about him; although when I speak thus I have been attacked for being a Moonie and quite a Unification apologist or a Universalist and quite a few other things as well; but I never joined the Unification Church: I studied it’s theology and the black book I was given by Bradford Bryant ( Kent ) Bufkin in 1980 before I went to London; and learned then of the incredible and earthshaking unveiling of the Providence of God hidden in the Bible in it’s basically 7 spiritually encrafted and designed levels from the individual level with Adam with his division as the origin into Cain and Abel; and to the familial level with Noah; to tribal level with Noah’s 3 sons and their 3 wives and their children and then the racial level as with Abraham Issac, Ishmael and then Esau and Jacob; and then the national level with Moses, and Joshua and then to the global level at Jesus and finally where we stand now: at the universal level at the second coming itself with the return of the Son of Man
(universal being “heaven and earth” itself as the Cosmic level ) and our Last Days in which all this happens to come out and be explained clearly before the Last Judgment.
 
If any doubt the reality of which I speak I counsel them to remain silent until they know entirely of the darkness out of which and whereof they then speak: former Moonies and disillusioned former members and the entire complex and confusing reports we now have from self-appointed “investigator” and “experts” and “christian hand wringers” of every possible stripe about everything concerning the Unification Church and it’s founder: and there is a reason for this as well; of the which I shall go into in full detail here in this post a little later.
 
That Rev. Moon came to America in 1965 with such a detailed and unmistakably revolutionary exposition about the Bible and the levels of the Providence in such clear and easily understood concepts with so much sheer “gnosis” or Understanding being demonstrated in word and deed is undoubtedly what terrified the conventional Christians in the 60’s who demonized him in a racist manner and accused his followers ( and his Korean followers ) in particular and then ignored them all completely’ this being their entire reaction to something they should have examined under a real microscope of analyzing and argument based on the obvious truth of what was being discussed and revealed instead of rejection across-the-board without any real understanding being demonstrated at all is one of the most disheartening things that I ever witnessed: period; and the Christians here in America should have been watching: but they weren’t; they were sleeping and deaf; blind to what they saw before them and unresponsive to any new ideas or concepts being delivered to them even to cause a reformation in their outmoded thinking and thus spark the lively debate about just what WAS going on here in America with the hippies and radicals and Jesus freaks and so on: no; the so-called christian leadership in the 60’s and 70’s put it’s collective head in the sand and showed their ass in it’s place waving the flag of surrender to the status quo up in the air: and thus showed a total and complete lack of any kind of “Christianity” in their behavior in almost every way imaginable.
 
The standoff given to Rev. Moon as the gratitude to someone who came here with a message; and who had almost died being worked to death in a North Korean Prison Camp while courageously resisting and fighting the demonic and indescribably cruel communist puppet regime of Kim Jong Il with all of his might FOR US and all we hold near and dear in AMERICA: for this I apologize to Rev. Moon with all of my heart on behalf of all those who never understood what he really accomplished in all that he personally overcame for our sakes: for that I ask his forgiveness on behalf of the American people for how shabby they were and even how they locked him up for stuff every church leader in America does everyday; for that I humbly beg his forgiveness in our stupidity and arrogance.
 
He lived because he was rescued one day before he was to be killed : and yet he was viewed with suspicion for this same period in the time of his harsh imprisonment for this very reason and treated as if he had been somehow “brainwashed” with the brand of Christianity he now brought to America as the real gift from Korea and it’s people to America that it so plainly was in so many ways; yet he was condemned as if the North Koreans had developed the ideas we see in the book “Divine Principle” in some sinister plot as a satanic ploy to destroy contemporary Christianity by infiltrating it from within or some other nonsense.
 
A bigger mistake could never have been perpetuated than the one that made Rev. Moon appear as if he had come up with all his numerical and completely rational analysis of what was in the Old and New Testaments out of his own head without any guidance from above as seen by his life of prayer and all the evidence in his writings of much plain soul-searching about God and his covenant with mankind and sending of the Christ is frankly and totally impossible for anybody with half a brain who can read: Rev. Moon is without doubt one of the most towering figures of the Providence of God who ever lived: and his impact is world-shattering in it’s breathtaking scope; underlying grasp; definite passion and totally unshakable commitment to uncovering the Will of God throughout history behind all of mankind’s groping toward any real attaining of His Word and the Will concealed within it and thus of the revealed Purpose and Goal by God for and of the Creation itself: and only those who ever read in entirety his book “Divine Principle” and studied the key concepts and far-reaching ideas and correspondences shown there in it’s pages would even have a clue of where to start any informed discussion of what Rev. Moon’s actual mission or final end might even be.
 
Anyone who doubts the veracity of what I say should study the book “Divine Principle” inside and out for about five years and read ever bit of the commentary given to the senior members in the church that are never published or given to anyone outside the Church that I did have access to: and then we shall have a real informed chat about Rev. Moon and his Divine Principle: until then they are just ignorant and uniformed on any real balanced decisions on who Rev. Moon is or even exactly what is being promulgated in the pages of the book and where it could even be said to be right; wrong or anything else that could be said about the material.
 
Just like another realm where people seem to also have made similar mistakes and for much of the same reasons: that is with the Philosophy of the Unity behind all formal religious systems and with that Unification towards which mankind slowly evolves that is Sufism itself; of which there is more than just a passing identification of with in the terminology about the Providence and the Principle of Indemnity by Rev. Moon ( although he never mentions Sufism) and then further information about the “dues” on pays on the Path and then ultimately in the idea of “Unification” itself for the Human Race.
 
Both Hands Clapping: a Little Closer to the Actuality and Truth About Rev. Moon and the Divine Principle; the Key of David which is the Divine Principle embodied in the Cross of Christ as the Power of God.
This is far different than the book “Divine Principle” written by Rev. Moon which is a flawed masterpiece; and elucidates the exposition of the Key quite well in may places: but falls short in a few others; which I with John the Divine had to repair along with the service of Hyo Jin Moon from spirit world as the angel of the Covenant I have with Rev. Moon in the position of Saul; and Hyo Jin Moon now dead but raised in the position of Jonathan for whom John the Baptist was named: and I stand in the position of the singer; the child who is David.
And if I do point out the 3 Great Errors in Rev. Moon’s book “Divine Principle” on the pages where he has said what I know to be things that are plainly wrong I still insist on the roughly 75% of what is written in that book as being about 100% correct as being on target and true in every sense of the Word: thus I defend Rev. Moon on the one hand as knowing who is really is while also trying to get him to finally come to me so that the REAL Foundation for the Unification of World Christianity can be set up: and then the Unification of Humanity itself as well
 
And yet I also tell him in no uncertain terms what my Father Jesus has shown me by sending me his servant John (who is his best friend and personal messenger ) and why he revealed to me everything about Rev. Moon and his relationship to the Black race here in America as the Third Israel and it’s union with the White Race and then on this Foundation of Salvation then all the rest of mankind in the uncovering of still another Book: this one being the Revelation of Jesus Christ that John showed me is the Book of Life of the Lamb ITSELF: the Word of God that Rev. Moon keeps talking about as being where the Providence must at some point really begin with
 
Even so: I have now shown Unification Church theologians and professors that the Revelation has been given to me to reveal it to the world for just that reason starting at the Unification Church I have been as ignored by these figure in the Unification Church utterly regardless of the fact that I know exactly what I am talking about; just as; I suppose, Rev. Moon feels he was ignored even when he showed his grasp of the Old and New Testaments that was for his time of a veritableJohn the Baptist: of whom the Lamb had said:
“………….Of men born of women there has not arisen a greater prophet
than John the Baptist ,,,”
……….. in and of itself a statement that certainly sums up what could and shall certainly be said of Rev. Moon by me in my book in THIS DAY: and no one outside of Rev. Moon’s church even now more than 3 decades later even sees it! They wrote him off here in the USA at the start because he was Korean: and way before they even gave him a chance; out-of-hand discrimination and head-in-sand ignorance at it’s finest.
 
What one might call a crying shame; and truly we live in dark times here at these Last Days; no further proof even being needed other than even the small evidence of just what I have shown here.
 
Answers about the Coming of the Messiah and the Messenger of Jehovah of Hosts called “the Priest”.
As we now are faced with the advance of events culminating in the Last Judgment here beginning at December 25th 2012 ( yes by all means quote me ) we are also face with the spectacle of Rev. Moon furiously backpedaling on the conventional idea of the Messiah with a explanation that seems to include being the Messiah but somehow dying and letting people go on exactly as before only with no Immortal Messiah or even any at all “at all”: just endless marrying and being given in marriage and his writings on being married and that’s it: finito.
 
Resurrection, Regeneration; a second coming: we will have none of that it seems!
 
Blowing Out the candles of faith….l

Advertisements

The Resentment of the Elites and the Entitlement of the Ungrateful; Why Fighting Death to the Death Proves Immortality Exists ~ Or ~ How to Live Forever by Neglecting to Die

The Fighting of Death to the Death:

How to Live Forever by Neglecting to Die

Image result for art of mark bryan trump

Image result for trump octopus political cartoon

The Guests of the Bride Stripped Bare

Some members of the many seem to think that supporting the few is a clever thing to do. They should be careful of what they wish for.

If you examine right wing policies as implemented in the UK and US there is overwhelming evidence that they are the policies of people who believe in Social Darwinism, survival of the fittest or in this case survival of the richest.

Extrapolate that to a worldwide level and some of the mega rich have a vision of the world that should dissuade members of the many from supporting that few. Their vision of the future is of the world as their playground and they really don’t care if the rest of us are around or not.

If you understand that vision you will be able to make sense of how they can cut disability and envisage cutting 2,5OO Pounds a year off the poorest people in Britain.

You will also understand how Donald Trump can happily give tax cuts to the richest people whilst some in America die off while unable to pay for medical care.

None of these things happen by accident. They represent the thinking of the so called elite who exercise influence over all our lives.
Angus McDonald

Related image

The Carnival Barker: The First Impression

When Donald Trump was elected president, I wondered what had happened to my party.

He was filthy, the opposite of everything that I was taught to strive for.

His name was on strip clubs in Atlantic City and Las Vegas.

He openly bragged about taking sexual advantage of women.

As a boy, I looked up in reverence to the men who stood on stage at the Promise Keepers conventions, preaching about living with integrity. They talked about being unselfish, sacrificing yourself for others, keeping promises at all costs.

To see a president so out of sync with these values was jarring. Weren’t we the Moral Majority? The people for whom free markets were our highest economic value and righteous leadership was our highest qualification for governance?

How were we supporting someone who seemed so disconnected from our values? Someone who seemed to regard free markets as anathema instead of an ideal?

Weirdly, this businessman didn’t seem to understand how trade worked….

…..and the Ringmaster: of a Three Ring Circus

“In my life, I have watched John Kennedy talk on television about missiles in Cuba. I saw Lyndon Johnson look Richard Russell squarely in the eye and and say,

“And we shall overcome.”

I saw Richard Nixon resign and Gerald Ford tell the Congress that our long national nightmare was over.

I saw Jimmy Carter talk about malaise and Ronald Reagan talk about a shining city on a hill.

I saw George H.W. Bush deliver the eulogy for the Soviet bloc, and Bill Clinton comfort the survivors of Timothy McVeigh’s madness in Oklahoma City.

I saw George W. Bush struggle to make sense of it all on September 11, 2001, and I saw Barack Obama sing “Amazing Grace” in the wounded sanctuary of Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, South Carolina.

These were the presidents of my lifetime.

These were not perfect men. They were not perfect presidents, God knows.

Not one of them was that. But they approached the job, and they took to the podium, with all the gravitas they could muster as appropriate to the job.

They tried, at least, to reach for something in the presidency that was beyond their grasp as ordinary human beings. They were not all ennobled by the attempt, but they tried nonetheless…

And comes now this hopeless, vicious buffoon, and the audience of equally hopeless and vicious buffoons who laughed and cheered when he made sport of a woman whose lasting memory of the trauma she suffered is the laughter of the perpetrators. Now he comes, a man swathed in scandal, with no interest beyond what he can put in his pocket and what he can put over on a universe of suckers, and he does something like this while occupying an office that we gave him, and while endowed with a public trust that he dishonors every day he wakes up in the White House.

The scion of a multigenerational criminal enterprise, the parameters of which we are only now beginning to comprehend. A vessel for all the worst elements of the American condition.

And a cheap, soulless bully besides. Watch him again, behind the seal of the President of the United States. Isn’t he a funny man? Isn’t what happened to that lady hilarious? Watch the assembled morons cheer. This is the only story now.”– Charles Pierce

The Fighting of Death to the Death:

Justice Shall Prevail:

How to Live Forever in Peace by Neglecting to Die with Hate

“…Where the Spirit of the Lord is…there is Freedom…’

The problem with the evangelico anti-christian Neo Nazi movement of the Confederate KKK South lies in the erroneous judgmental decision by Hard Right Wing Fundamentalists to judge people as if they were God, but in Truth, they are just the Final Form of Lucifer…hypocritically judging other people in complete contradiction to my Father Jesus’s warning not to do so…

In so far as they were told not to Judge,  lest theybe judged“….

And this is the part they have always overlooked…. they will be judged….and not by Gods Standard…

No

By their OWN standard

Yet they condemn others for the slightest infraction they do so practicing total mercy and forgiveness amongst themselves for any crime;  so much so that they are now lawless, as in having to accept Trump as their Messiah it has meant that what was formerly condemned as Sin must now be seen as Virtue…

Indeed my Father said:

“..Judge not…lest ye be judged…

For the Judgment ye judge with…ye shall be judged by…

And the measure ye mete…the same shall then be meted out to you…

….And I say this…every idle word that men shall speak…they shall give an account for in the Day of Reckoning…”

So now these Men of Belial…Liars who believe Slavery is justified based on the Old Testament; as hiding the racism that seeks to justifies itself; cherished by the hellbent acolytes of Hatred and violence….the KKK of the Rebel South…

Their Princes of Hatred and Champions of Ignorance

“‘…When I moved to Devin Nunes’ district I was proud to be represented by him. He was a farmer, one of the salt-of-the-earth people I could trust to carry out my commonsense Republican values. His influence grew and his family stopped farming in California, but I was proud to see him listed on Time’s Most Influential 40-Under-40 list of politicians to watch. He said then that the Founding Fathers were his political heroes, and I applauded. I voted for him in every election.

But Devin Nunes’s behavior became bizarre and erratic after President Trump’s election. His ardent support for this amoral man betrayed the values that we hold as Republicans and as Christians. He seemed to entirely discard the Constitution, with its brilliant ideas about checks and balances.

He seemed to be possessed, serving a new master who neither knew about nor cared about the value of integrity or the ideas that Nunes’ former heroes Madison and Jefferson enshrined in our founding documents. When he followed President Trump into attacks on the free press, I saw the once-valued fourth estate under attack. Those who aspire to integrity encourage the accountability of the press. Those with something to hide attack it. The fact that The Fresno Bee has endorsed Devin Nunes in every previous election made his perfidy all the more distasteful….”

So it’s here that they will NOW reap the proverbial Whirlwind…losing their customary base that at least had the sheen of a principled attempt of a conservative point of view…now totally gone…. ….because the Wrath of the Lamb has now indeed Arose: across this Nation… for those who have done well as of the Resurrection of Life who shall see Life…but they whose works are evil surely long for Death; who arise in the Resurrection unto Damnation…

Who doubts my word I say unto Thee and ye all :

……….W A T C H

“….For it must needs be be…that Evil will come
…..but Woe unto them through whom it comes….”

The Only Wise God …the Savior

I am one of the left-behind Republicans. I am a Christian and grew up thinking that voting Republican was the only option for people like me. Opposing abortion was all-important, followed closely by the value of integrity. In the years when I grew up, freedom at home was guaranteed but we desired freedom for those abroad, as well. America could be a shining light to the nations: an exemplar of what happens when faith, integrity, and the genius of the principles enshrined in the Constitution combine to ensure righteousness and justice for all. People around the world wanted to be like Americans, and it was more than a desire for Coca-Cola and Levi’s. Those were just the symbols, the top layers representing a deeper set of values. America was great because she was good.

In the Republican party of my youth, the Constitution was a near-sacred document. We were the party who pounded it, memorized parts of it, stood up for it. I have taught it to my kids, just as my parents talked about it with me: in hushed tones and with reverence. We talked about the Founding Fathers like our Olympus: a Pantheon of brilliant, far-seeing men. They were imperfect but aspired to values like honesty and selflessness. The media was the valued fourth estate, speaking truth to power and bringing our nation back into line after deviations and ethical lapses like Watergate. They were part of our compass, returning us back to the true north of national uprightness. Back to, as President Lincoln, the founder of my party said, “…the better angels of our nature.”

I joined the military and pledged to give my life for my country if called upon. I had no doubt that the leaders above me would have done the same. While politicians weren’t perfect, I didn’t ever suspect one of them of bad faith. They had different ideas about governance, but there’s room for that in our great country.

Image result for trump octopus political cartoon

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God | Measure 144 / Missive #333 ~⊕~ * ~⊕~

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

Leader of Our Republic: the Moral Compass in the Hand of Bernie Sanders…

“….Today I spoke at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies about the problem of authoritarian nationalism threatening democratic societies, and the need to build a global progressive movement based on the principles of democracy, equality, and economic and environmental justice. I hope you’ll give my speech a listen and join me in the movement that stands behind a vision of shared prosperity, security and dignity for all people….”

============================

============================ 

Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

==========================================

“….What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process.

What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. ….”

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  

His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license

 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

 

 

Image may contain: 1 person, suit and text

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

==========================================

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

…I am black, but comely…..”

“…But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

=========================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said”

“Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life

and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange

that these same men treat human life

like the cheapest and most disposable resource

on the face of the Earth???”

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

 Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process. What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. 

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

Image result for cartoon

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

=======================================================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said “Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange that these same men treat human life like the cheapest and most disposable resource on the face of the Earth???”

 

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

The Prophetic Context of the Trumpist Policy: National Racism at the Level of an Institutionalized Agenda: a Review of White Supremacy; and a Vision of What Will Now Come to Pass

The Thief in the Night:

How the Day of Reckoning Arrived Unseen and Unknown

Exodus 1:7-16 King James Version (KJV)

And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them.

Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.

And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we:

10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.

11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

12 But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew. And they were grieved because of the children of Israel.

13 And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour:

14 And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in morter, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field: all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour.

15 And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah:

16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

 

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Image result for david duke

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s monologue some weeks back about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the full blown endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime showThe Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisteupon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

 

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisteupon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.
White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Image result for eli eli lema sabachthani

As one German social Darwinist and eugenicist expressed it,

‘It was Weismann’s teaching regarding the separation of the germ plasm from the soma, the hereditary stuff from the body of the individual, that first allowed us to recognize the importance of Darwin’s principle of selection. Only then did we comprehend that it is impossible to improve our progeny’s condition by means of physical and mental training. Apart from the direct manipulation of the nucleus, only selection can preserve and improve the race.’

Indeed, for those who accepted Weismann’s views with respect to both heredity and the ‘all-supremacy’ of selection, eugenics was the only practical strategy to ensure racial progress and avert racial decline.
If the ideas of Haeckel and Weismann encouraged many contemporaries to view natural selection as the sole agent of all organic and social progress, the writings of the two biologists also emphasized that progress was not inevitable.
Under certain conditions the ‘unfit‘ might prosper, thereby posing a challenge to further evolutionary development.
This ‘selectionist’ perspective and language provided Germany’s future eugenicists with novel tools of analysis that enabled them to come to grips with the ‘social question’ by transforming it into a scientific problem: the asocial individuals created by industrialization became for them the biologically and medically unfit.
The only way to eliminate this group from the population was through a policy of “
‘rational selection,’ or race hygiene.
The significance of the three contexts is nowhere more clearly visible than in the intellectual backgrounds and early writings of Alfred Ploetz and Wilhelm Schallmayer.
Working largely independently of one another during the early of the movement (1890-1903), both men laid the foundations for the future course of race hygiene in their country.

Ploetz’s organizational talents and charismatic personality allowed him to create the institutional basis for the young movement almost single-handedly.

Alfred Ploetz

Alfred Ploetz (August 22, 1860 – March 20, 1940) was a German physician, biologist, eugenicist known for coining the term ‘Rassenhygiene’ (racial hygiene), and promoting the concept in Germany. ‘Rassenhygiene’ is a form of eugenics. Ploetz first proposed the theory of racial hygiene (race-based eugenics) in his “Racial Hygiene Basics” (Grundlinien einer Rassenhygiene) in 1895. In 1904 Ploetz founded the periodical “Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie” with Fritz Lenz as chief editor, and in 1905 the German Society for Racial Hygiene (De Berliner Gesellschaft fur Rassenhygiene) with 31 members. page In 1907 the society became the “International Society for Racial Hygiene”. In 1930 he became an honorary doctor of the University of Munich. Ploetz was a supporter of the National Socialist Party, which took power in 1933. Ploetz wrote in April 1933 that he believed Adolf Hitler would bring racial hygiene from its previous marginality into the mainstream. In 1933 Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick established an “expert advisory committee for population and racial policy,” which included Ploetz, Fritz Lenz, Ernst Rüdin and Hans F.K. Günther. This expert advisory committee had the task of advising the Reich Government on the implementation and enforcement of legislation regarding racial and eugenic issues. In 1936, Hitler appointed Ploetz to a professorship. In 1937 Ploetz joined the National Socialist Party. Along with many other eugenicists in Europe and America, Ploetz believed in the superiority of the Nordic race, and he favored the global dominance of the Aryan race. His writings were a major influence on Völkisch ideology.

 

The 13th sign of the Zodiac--Ophiucus. He's located by Scorpio, in the area known as the DARK RIFT.

The 13th sign of the Zodiac–Ophiuchus. He’s located by Scorpio, in the area known as the DARK RIFT

 – COMMENTARY
27 AUG 2018 AT 13:34 ET    

“While the exaggerator-in-chief is well known for his habitual lying, the most common psychological diagnosis he’s been given by experts in the field is narcissistic personality disorder.

While any diagnosis should require a full mental examination before accepted as clinical truth, the mountains of behavioral evidence for Trump’s narcissism arguably provides more justification for the label than any standard clinical test. At this point, the claim can hardly be debated, and even staunch supporters would admit that Trump thinks he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. It takes a special kind of narcissist to shamelessly compare their book to The Bible in front an audience full of conservatives. His narcissism knows few limits, and it’s hard to imagine even the man himself denying such an obvious fact,,”

 

A National Policy of Institutionalized Racism:

First Written of in Sacred Literature, Began in Ancient Egypt, paralleled in Caste Structure of India

Many medically trained race hygienists argued that the surest way to improve the general level of national health was to upgrade the bodily constitution of all individuals in society – a task to be accomplished by means of an energetic eugenics program.

In addition to the ‘social question’, and the German medical tradition, there was a third influence that greatly shaped the early development of the movement: the “selectionist” variety of social Darwinism, popularized by Germany’s most outspoken biologist, Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919), and later legitimated by the scientific writings of the Freiburg embryologist August Weismann (1834-1914).

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Charles  Darwin ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Ernst Haeckel

Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel (16 February 1834 – 9 August 1919) was a German biologist, naturalist, philosopher, physician, professor, marine biologist, and artist who discovered, described and named thousands of new species, mapped a genealogical tree relating all life forms, and coined many terms in biology, including anthropogeny, ecology, phylum, phylogeny, stem cell, and Protista. Haeckel promoted and popularised Charles Darwin’s work in Germany, and developed the influential recapitulation theory (“ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”) claiming that an individual organism’s biological development, or ontogeny, parallels and summarises its species’ evolutionary development, or phylogeny. The published artwork of Haeckel includes over 100 detailed, multi-colour illustrations of animals and sea creatures (‘Kunstformen der Natur’). As a philosopher, Ernst Haeckel wrote ‘Die Welträtsel’ (1895–1899), the genesis for the term “world riddle” (Welträtsel). Haeckel’s political beliefs were influenced by his affinity for the German Romantic movement, coupled with his acceptance of a form of Lamarckism. Rather than being a strict Darwinian, Haeckel believed that the characteristics of an organism were acquired through interactions with the environment and that ontogeny reflected phylogeny. He believed the social sciences to be instances of “applied biology”, and that phrase was picked up and used in Volkisch philosophy. In 1905, Haeckel founded a group called the Deutscher Monistenbund to promote his religious and political beliefs. This group lasted until 1933 and included such notable members as Wilhelm Ostwald, Georg von Arco, Helene Stöcker and Walter Arthur Berendsohn. Haeckel believed that human races evolved independently, and in parallel with each other. Haeckel divided human beings into ten races, of which the Caucasian (Aryan) was the highest and the primitives were doomed to extinction.

August Weismann
August Friedrich Leopold Weismann (17 January 1834 – 5 November 1914) was a German evolutionary biologist. Ernst Mayr ranked him the second most notable evolutionary theorist of the 19th century, after Charles Darwin. Weismann became the Director of the Zoological Institute and the first Professor of Zoology at Freiburg. His main contribution was the germ plasm theory, at one time also known as ‘Weismannism’, according to which (in a multicellular organism) inheritance only takes place by means of the germ cells – the gametes such as egg cells and sperm cells. Other cells of the body – somatic cells – do not function as agents of heredity.
Haeckel went far beyond Darwin in his attempt to flesh out the larger philosophical and social meaning of the evolutionary theory.
Although, like Darwin, he believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, Haeckel always stressed Darwin’s selection principle as the most important engine of forward directed organic change; indeed, for Haeckel, Darwinism was synonymous with selection.
Weismann, who came to reject the possibility of the inheritance of acquired characteristics through his work on heredity, afforded Darwin’s principle of natural selection an even greater role in organic and social evolution than did the author of the ‘Origin of Species’ himself.
His famous mechanism of heredity, ‘the continuity of the germ plasm‘, first articulated in 1883, challenged the basic tenets of the more optimistic first-generation social Darwinists who assumed that new characteristics acquired by an organism as a result of environmental change would be transmitted to future generations.
As one German social Darwinist and eugenicist expressed it,

It was Weismann’s teaching regarding the separation of the germ plasm from the soma, the hereditary stuff from the body of the individual, that first allowed us to recognize the importance of Darwin’s principle of selection. Only then did we comprehend that it is impossible to improve our progeny’s condition by means of physical and mental training. Apart from the direct manipulation of the nucleus, only selection can preserve and improve the race.

Indeed, for those who accepted Weismann’s views with respect to both heredity and the ‘all-supremacy’ of selection, eugenics was the only practical strategy to ensure racial progress and avert racial decline.
If the ideas of Haeckel and Weismann encouraged many contemporaries to view natural selection as the sole agent of all organic and social progress, the writings of the two biologists also emphasized that progress was not inevitable.
Under certain conditions the ‘unfit‘ might prosper, thereby posing a challenge to further evolutionary development.
This ‘selectionist’ perspective and language provided Germany’s future eugenicists with novel tools of analysis that enabled them to come to grips with the ‘social question’ by transforming it into a scientific problem: the asocialindividuals created by industrialization became for them the biologically and medically unfit.
The only way to eliminate this group from the population was through a policy of “
‘rational selection,’ or race hygiene.

 

The Untouchables and The Land of Goshen.

 

 

 

“….When a narcissist’s self-esteem or self-worth is badly injured, their whole identity begins to fall apart, and they often respond with what is referred to asnarcissistic rage.”

When this happens, the lashing out, bullying, threats, and erratic behaviors rise to new levels. Rather than accepting the blame one deserves for their own actions, narcissists tell themselves that others are responsible, and that they deserve to be punished. They often become obsessed with revenge, which comes in many forms, such as verbal or even physical abuse.

Modern technology like social media provides the narcissist with the perfect medium for attacking perceived enemies, and Donald Trump has certainly taken advantage of it.

But his threats have gone beyond personal enemies. When the possibility of impeachment became a reality for the president, his instinct was to tell the world on national television that if such a thing were to happen, it would cause the economy to crash.

“I think everybody would be poor,” he told Fox News last Wednesday, trying to strike fear into the hearts of all Americans.

David Duke and White Genocide

 

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric a few weeks back in her “Rant and Rave Show”got the endorsement of an open white supremacist ( Namely, David Duke…. )

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading to “the collapse of the American family” in June.

…………….……………………Our New Paradigm of the Slow Creeping Cancer of Racism …. as National Policy…………………….

Our Real President….

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.
White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

The Voice in the Wilderness, Sanity in the White House and the Dead Duck of the Trump Presidency: Can the Evangelical South decide the Devil was not their Savior ?? The Last Trump, the Image of the Beast and the Shadow of Hitler | Measure 144 ~MISSIVE Series 333 ~⊕~ INDEX B~⊕~

From the New York Times and “Rocket Man, Nuclear Madness and the Mind of Donald Trump…” by John Gartner

A Voice in the Wilderness ???

“…As we’ve learned from history, a person can be an authoritarian and also a sociopath.   

They actually help each other. Nobody with a conscience could really be a good dictator.

Trump’s spokesman Rudy Giuliani has been doing the media rounds, making threatening remarks about James Comey and  Robert Mueller. This is banana-republic dictator behavior. There is also the memo where Trump’s attorneys argued that he could pardon himself and is a de facto king who is above the law. Given his personality, how does this impact Donald Trump emotionally and cognitively? Is he excited? Titillated?

I think he does feel that way. Giuliani really is his alter ego. This is what he wanted in his spokesman and lawyer. Someone who would just make up vicious lies and just keep slashing and burning and hurling mud and threats, devaluations and false accusations and conspiracies to muddy the waters, to make Trump look like the victim. You’re right, this is not a metaphor. This is organized crime stuff. It is the same psychology where there are all kinds of open extortionist threats

In a move that risks exposing them to even more vicious rants of “fake news” in unhinged presidential tweets, The New York Times today published an anonymous Op-Ed essay from a senior official in the Trump administration who openly admits that he and other ‘like-minded colleagues….have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

The newspaper prefaced the essay with a statement explaining the departure from their usual policy of requiring that the identities all Op-Ed authors to be verified and disclosed.

“The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers,” the paper’s editorial board explained.

The content of the Op-Ed quickly demonstrates why the author requested anonymity and why the White House today must be a hive of whispers and intrigue as the staff tries to determine who is behind the damning content.

 

The author begins his essay with a confirmation of one of the worst take-aways from the portrait of the Trump White House as portrayed in noted journalist Bob Woodward’s new book.

“President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.”

“It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.”

“The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

“I would know. I am one of them.”

An admission like that means that the author is risking not only their job, but potentially their liberty as the notoriously litigious Trump is sure to scream treason in a belligerent tweet as soon as he reads it.

The anonymous source takes pains to differentiate their stance from the typical public notion of the “resistance.”

“To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.”

“But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.”

“That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.”

The Bible and the Mein Kampf in the Red Box

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA to

John Gartner the Author….

‘…Trump’s behavior is either based on a faulty premise or some kind of paranoid conspiracy theory or a denial of reality. On that basis, Dr. Reiss argues that if Trump were a policeman, he would take away his gun. In the book, other contributors such as Dr. Steven Buser and former Gen. William Enyart argue that Trump would not be able to qualify for a security clearance to be a nuclear missile launch officer…”

Dr. Buser argued in a New York Times op-ed that Trump’s behavior and character suggest that he is not stable. Trump is not trustworthy; he’s not of the highest character.

He’s not of the highest honesty. Therefore, Trump would fail to gain the clearance that allows an airman to handle nuclear weapons. He would be disqualified.

Yet this person who is not qualified to even load the bombs onto the planes is the commander in chief and has the unilateral authority for any reason at any time to launch nuclear weapons.

Trump also has a blatant disregard for expert knowledge, which signals to a broader problem with American culture at present and especially to how American conservatives embrace anti-intellectualism. Trump bragged that he would not need to prepare for his meeting with Kim because he works on instinct.

Is Trump even capable of processing the seriousness of his meeting with North Korea’s leader?

No. Trump’s grandiosity is such that he actually believes he is an expert on everything. Based on his speeches and interviews, Trump is apparently the world authority on 25 different issues. This also speaks to a bigger problem, which is the death of expertise. For authoritarians and malignant narcissists like Trump an independent source of authority, whether it’s the press, the bureaucracy or the experts, are threats to his authority. Trump leaves positions at the State Department unfilled because he doesn’t want experts telling him what to do. He knows that he knows more than everybody else. What’s really frightening is that he actually believes that he has this kind of papal infallibility.

How would you explain to Republican leaders and other right-wing elites the seriousness of Trump’s mental and personality issues and the danger he poses to America and the world? 

I truly believe that the elected Republican politicians are completely lost souls. They are like the characters in a zombie movie who keep their father in the basement because they don’t really understand that he is a zombie. He’s not coming back. I really, truly think it’s that bad.

There a few Republicans who are trying to sound the alarm about Trump, but the Republican Party as a whole is like organized crime at this point, and Trump is the boss. There’s absolutely no other conclusion you could draw.

Now today from the White House an Insider breaks Ranks….

“…The author in the Times then explains the source of the problem these rebellious White House insiders see with the president.

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.”

“Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.”

“In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.”

To make it clear that they are not left wing idealogues opposed to the Republican agenda, the author cites their support for deregulation, the repugnant tax breaks for billionaires, and out of control military spending.

However, they cite these “successes” as having been accomplished despite the president’s “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” leadership style.

“From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.”

“Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.”

“’There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,’ a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.”

They then go on to try to reassure the American public that they and their like-minded colleagues are the last bulwark of hope preventing the administration and the country as a whole from descending into chaos, in a somewhat self-serving assessment.

“The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.”

“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.”

They then continue to describe a “two-track presidency” where Trump is advocating practices and policies that would feel right at home in an autocratically-controlled society, while what the right-wing refers to as the “deep state” — rebranded the “steady state” by the author — ignores his rants and maintains a modicum of normalcy.

 

The most shocking revelation contained in the Op-Ed is the admission that even at the beginning of the administration “there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment” to remove the president due to his inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office. Unfortunately, they decided to avoid precipitating a constitutional crisis and simply vowed to do what they could to contain the president’s worst impulses.

The Op-Ed concludes with a lament on the current state of the body politic and a call to the American people to transcend politics to come together.

“The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.”

“Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.”

“We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.”

“There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.”

After a day of labeling all the tales of internal strife in the Oval Office contained in Bob Woodward’s book as lies promulgated by Democratic shills, the White House is sure to label this latest desperate plea from rogue administration officials as “fake news,” and his gullible supporters will continue to place their faith in the false and dangerous quasi-deity that they have transformed him into in their minds.

“….Let’s hope that, whatever their motives, some adults remain in control in the administration,

even after the inevitable purge occurs in the coming days….

Psychologist John Gartner on Trump’s behavior:

“It’s a coup that’s not moving slowly anymore

Former Johns Hopkins professor argues Trump is getting worse, may be “on the boundary of psychosis and reality”

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Fascism Arrives in the USA

I do find myself feeling like, “Dear God, why can these people not see it? And what can we do to open their eyes?” It is like a 1950s or 1960s horror movie where nobody would believe that there was actually a monster that’s about to destroy the town and there are these Cassandra-like figures trying to warn people. But the townspeople remain in denial and they are doomed.

Trump’s political movement meets the criteria for a political cult. You are a psychologist. Is it possible to reach someone who is stuck in Trump’s cult? Why does he have such influence over these people?

It does meet the criteria. You’ve got the charismatic leader, and his followers subsume their identity into his group, which makes them feel larger and more powerful. Once you have that kind of blind belief and loyalty, the leader, as Donald Trump has said, could really shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and nothing would happen. The cognitive dissonance is such that the cult members will rationalize anything. For example, something like 50 percent of Republicans say that if Trump wanted to cancel the 2020 election, that would be fine with them.

Faux News and the White Nationalist Movement of Bannon, Steve Miller, and Don the Con…

Bobby Azarian, Raw Story

 – COMMENTARY
27 AUG 2018 AT 13:34 ET    

“While the exaggerator-in-chief is well known for his habitual lying, the most common psychological diagnosis he’s been given by experts in the field is narcissistic personality disorder.

While any diagnosis should require a full mental examination before accepted as clinical truth, the mountains of behavioral evidence for Trump’s narcissism arguably provides more justification for the label than any standard clinical test. At this point, the claim can hardly be debated, and even staunch supporters would admit that Trump thinks he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. It takes a special kind of narcissist to shamelessly compare their book to The Bible in front an audience full of conservatives. His narcissism knows few limits, and it’s hard to imagine even the man himself denying such an obvious fact,,”

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s monologue some weeks back about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people, she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

“….When a narcissist’s self-esteem or self-worth is badly injured, their whole identity begins to fall apart, and they often respond with what is referred to as “narcissistic rage.”

When this happens, the lashing out, bullying, threats, and erratic behaviors rise to new levels. Rather than accepting the blame one deserves for their own actions, narcissists tell themselves that others are responsible, and that they deserve to be punished. They often become obsessed with revenge, which comes in many forms, such as verbal or even physical abuse.

Modern technology like social media provides the narcissist with the perfect medium for attacking perceived enemies, and Donald Trump has certainly taken advantage of it.

But his threats have gone beyond personal enemies. When the possibility of impeachment became a reality for the president, his instinct was to tell the world on national television that if such a thing were to happen, it would cause the economy to crash.

“I think everybody would be poor,” he told Fox News last Wednesday, trying to strike fear into the hearts of all Americans.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric a few weeks back in her “Rant and Rave Show” got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading to “the collapse of the American family in June.

……………..Our New Paradigm of the Slow Creeping Cancer of Racism …. as National Policy

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege.

It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Who set Up The Image of the Beast with Donald Trump ?? The JuJu of Omarosa Manigault Newman, the Priestess of the White Crow of Osiris: Jim Crow | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~⊕~ Index A

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

 Who Set Up the Image of the Beast???

Omarosa Manigault Newman

Image result for omarosa manigault

In the Revelation of my Father Jesus, the Lamb’s Book,  it tells in chapter 14 the fate of all those who end up loving and believing a lie: the Image of the Beast representing this very thing; the Image of the Axis Beast of Nazism now Worshiped by all the Southern Racist Reprobate Children of the Father of Lies, Unamerican in their Racism and Bigotry; Antichristian in their Words and their Actions.

They Pride themselves in being the Red “Trump” States of the Original 13 Confederate South who fought in the Civil War against the North.

The Fate they have earned for themselves is unknown to them, because the Day of the Lord…that of the Last Judgment on Judgment Day……comes unheralded into the World. For this reason it is described by both Peter and Paul as ” …. a thief in the Night…”

They who worship Trump are of the Camp of that Racist Strumpet South and her White Jim Crow Lover who now Parades at endless Rallies in the South land and has fundraising Fests  in the Southern White House, is even now preparing to End Free Speech and steal the Midterms if at all possible; with the help from their Russian Hacker friends…prepared to go for all the marbles… and to remove anything which stands in their Golden Calf’s way…

But in this unknown and unseen Day both he and they who worshiped him are delivered to the Lake of Fire, prepared for “All Liars…and Whosoever Maketh or Loveth a Lie….”

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Former Top KGB General Says Trump is a Russian Asset and he Likely Knows it

As Special Counsel Robert Mueller continues his probe into whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to meddle in the 2016 presidential election, a new book is about to be released which claims that Trump has been compromised by Russia for over three decades.
Daily Mail reports that a new book by Craig Unger, entitled ‘House of Trump, House of Putin; the Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia‘, claims that President Trump is and has been a Russian asset since 1987In 1987 Donald Trump travelled to Moscow, and Unger says that the former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, Oleg Kalugin, insists that Trump would have very likely been filmed with prostitutes at that time, saying that Trump had ‘many young ladies at his disposal’ and that Russian spies would have jumped at the opportunity.Kalugin also claims that Trump is an easy ‘Russian asset’ considering how greedy he has been over the years.  He goes as far as saying that Trump is most likely aware of the existence of blackmail material often referred to as ‘kompromat’.

If Russia was likely willing to gather ‘kompromat’ on Trump 31 years ago, it would seem to give further credence to the Steele Dossier which claims that Russia had gathered ‘kompromat’ on Trump back in 2013 as well. 

It’s worth noting that no proof of this blackmail material was provided to Unger by Kalugin — only his opinion on what most

likely would have taken place at the time of Trump’s visit to Moscow.

The book also looks into Trump’s other ties to shady Russian officials and businessmen dating back to the 1970s.  It will be released on August 14th.

———————————————————————————————–

White Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that

“the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore.

Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants

—————————————————————-

KKK-ENDORSED  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS III !!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………………………………………………….”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On

and On….

as also

 

 

 

the narrative in Europe 

 

 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

The Prophetic Truth….

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

 

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”