The Witnesses of the Last Day

The Journey To The Restoration of All Things Starting at the AMEN: the First and the Last

The Journey To The Restoration of All Things at the AMEN: the First and the Last

 

Twin Peaks as the First Holy Ground in America

Perspective of the Advent of the Wrath of the Lamb Slain from the Foundation of the World, starting at March 29th, Palm Sunday, 2015, at Sanctuary Church in Pennsylvania at the Confession made to me before the entire Congregation by Hyung Jin Moon of the Mistake of Sun Myung Moon about the True Nature of the Holy Spirit of God as being a Male Spirit, and not a Female Spirit

 

Now that I have begun to finally the final edit together for my book “A City Not Forsaken: My Generation and the Revelation of Salvation”, I have had quite a time going over the events since 1987 when I was brought out of my city to New Hope by John and his Angel and then began the 21 years of instruction by my guide on the Path sent to me by my Father Jesus that resulted in the book going to print.
 
But that I see clearly why I had to rectify all the mistakes that have been made and elucidate all the factors where no mistake was made that connect Rev. Moon and the events that have swirled around the history of My Generation since the “Flower Children” came to the City of St. Francis the real connection between myself and Rev. Moon must now be seen in it’s true light.
 
The events of which I speak center around the time that John F. Kennedy was killed; 1963 and then shortly after when Rev. Moon arrived in America in 1965.
 
Since no one with either a clue as to what Rev. Moon was really about and none in his church as well seem to have either the critical understanding to really be objective about Rev. Moon who were not in his church at it’s beginning here in America and those who were in it who all have clearly been dwarfed in their response to him and his mission along with what they all could see, especially his clear genius in explaining the Bible of which they have universally shown themselves to be totally unable to place in any objective field by which they could understand what really has been made manifest.
 The Real Christ…no Fig Leaf….

Thus they all have left his church and turned on him, or stayed and surprised no one by all falling before even the shadow of his legacy to mankind and the world; crushed by his almost supernatural inspiration and seemingly boundless depth of love and compassion, along with rejection of all manner of accepted dogma cherished by millions of Christians for the last 2,000 years.

For those who believe I am opposed and hostile to Rev. Moon out of hatred or anger of his being someone who speaks of himself in terms of “the Messiah” and he and his wife as “True Parents” or other things they could not be more mistaken; for even though I disagree with Rev. Moon in many general areas and quite a few specific ones I still know from what my Father Jesus’ servant John told me about Rev. Moon that he IS one of the central figures of the Providence of Salvation that we have all been blessed to even know in our century; and that he one of the greatest figures who ever walked on this planet; or who ever lived; when it comes to the story now to be written for all to see and the part he played in the unfolding of Mankind’s divine potential and the cosmic drama involved in mankind reaching it’s original nature; lost since the Fall.

 
The First Mistake: the Judgment by Appearance in the Last Days
As I have told people from the beginning not to Judge Rev. Moon in any way as they all don’t know what they are talking about; and to read things in newspapers or magazines and then to merely label him as a “false prophet” or “Antichrist” or a host of the other names in which people’s mistaken opinion about Rev. Moon instead of any personal experience with him shows that all of these accusations that judgmental people and especially judgmental “unchristians” make about him are based upon nothing but supposition and hearsay.
Rev. Moon is none of those things they say about him; although when I speak thus I have been attacked for being a Moonie and quite a Unification apologist or a Universalist and quite a few other things as well; but I never joined the Unification Church: I studied it’s theology and the black book I was given by Bradford Bryant ( Kent ) Bufkin in 1980 before I went to London; and learned then of the incredible and earthshaking unveiling of the Providence of God hidden in the Bible in it’s basically 7 spiritually encrafted and designed levels from the individual level with Adam with his division as the origin into Cain and Abel; and to the familial level with Noah; to tribal level with Noah’s 3 sons and their 3 wives and their children and then the racial level as with Abraham Isaac, Ishmael and then Esau and Jacob; and then the national level with Moses, and Joshua and then to the global level at Jesus and finally where we stand now: at the universal level at the second coming itself with the return of the Son of Man (universal being “heaven and earth” itself as the Cosmic level ) and our Last Days in which all this happens to come out and be explained clearly before the Last Judgment.
 
If any doubt the reality of which I speak I counsel them to remain silent until they know entirely of the darkness out of which and whereof they then speak: former Moonies and disillusioned former members and the entire complex and confusing reports we now have from self-appointed “investigator” and “experts” and “christian hand wringers” of every possible stripe about everything concerning the Unification Church and it’s founder: and there is a reason for this as well; of the which I shall go into in full detail here in this post a little later.
 
That Rev. Moon came to America in 1965 with such a detailed and unmistakably revolutionary exposition about the Bible and the levels of the Providence in such clear and easily understood concepts with so much sheer “gnosis” or Understanding being demonstrated in word and deed is undoubtedly what terrified the conventional Christians in the 60’s who demonized him in a racist manner and accused his followers ( and his Korean followers ) in particular and then ignored them all completely’ this being their entire reaction to something they should have examined under a real microscope of analyzing and argument based on the obvious truth of what was being discussed and revealed instead of rejection across-the-board without any real understanding being demonstrated at all
Rev. Moons faint welcome in the USA is one of the most disheartening things that I ever witnessed: period; and the Christians here in America should have been watching: but they weren’t; they were sleeping and deaf; blind to what they saw before them and unresponsive to any new ideas or concepts being delivered to them even to cause a reformation in their outmoded thinking and thus spark the lively debate about just what WAS going on here in America with the hippies and radicals and Jesus freaks and so on: no; the so-called christian leadership in the 60’s and 70’s put it’s collective head in the sand waving the flag of surrender to the status quo up in the air: and thus showed a total and complete lack of any kind of “Christianity” in their behavior in almost every way imaginable.
 
The standoff given to Rev. Moon as the gratitude to someone who came here with a message; and who had almost died being worked to death in a North Korean Prison Camp while courageously resisting and fighting the demonic and indescribably cruel communist puppet regime of Kim Jong Il with all of his might FOR US and all we hold near and dear in AMERICA: for this I apologize to Rev. Moon with all of my heart on behalf of all those who never understood what he really accomplished in all that he personally overcame for our sakes: for that I ask his forgiveness on behalf of the American people for how shabby they were and even how they locked him up for stuff every church leader in America does everyday; for that I humbly beg his forgiveness in our stupidity and arrogance.
 
He lived because he was rescued one day before he was to be killed : and yet he was viewed with suspicion for this same period in the time of his harsh imprisonment for this very reason and treated as if he had been somehow “brainwashed” with the brand of Christianity he now brought to America as the real gift from Korea and it’s people to America that it so plainly was in so many ways; yet he was condemned as if the North Koreans had developed the ideas we see in the book “Divine Principle” in some sinister plot as a satanic ploy to destroy contemporary Christianity by infiltrating it from within or some other nonsense.
 
A bigger mistake could never have been perpetuated than the one that made Rev. Moon appear as if he had come up with all his numerical and completely rational analysis of what was in the Old and New Testaments out of his own head without any guidance from above as seen by his life of prayer and all the evidence in his writings of much plain soul-searching about God and his covenant with mankind and sending of the Christ is frankly and totally impossible for anybody with half a brain who can read: Rev. Moon is without doubt one of the most towering figures of the Providence of God who ever lived: and his impact is world-shattering in it’s breathtaking scope; underlying grasp; definite passion and totally unshakable commitment to uncovering the Will of God throughout history behind all of mankind’s groping toward any real attaining of His Word and the Will concealed within it and thus of the revealed Purpose and Goal by God for and of the Creation itself: and only those who ever read in entirety his book “Divine Principle” and studied the key concepts and far-reaching ideas and correspondences shown there in it’s pages would even have a clue of where to start any informed discussion of what Rev. Moon’s actual mission or final end might even be.
 
Anyone who doubts the veracity of what I say should study the book “Divine Principle” inside and out for about five years and read ever bit of the commentary given to the senior members in the church that are never published or given to anyone outside the Church that I did have access to: and then we shall have a real informed chat about Rev. Moon and his Divine Principle: until then they are just ignorant and uniformed on any real balanced decisions on who Rev. Moon is or even exactly what is being promulgated in the pages of the book and where it could even be said to be right; wrong or anything else that could be said about the material.
 
Just like another realm where people seem to also have made similar mistakes and for much of the same reasons: that is with the Philosophy of the Unity behind all formal religious systems and with that Unification towards which mankind slowly evolves that is Sufism itself; of which there is more than just a passing identification of with in the terminology about the Providence and the Principle of Indemnity by Rev. Moon ( although he never mentions Sufism) and then further information about the “dues” on pays on the Path and then ultimately in the idea of “Unification” itself for the Human Race.
 
Both Hands Clapping: a Little Closer to the Actuality and Truth About Rev. Moon and the Divine Principle; the Key of David which is the Divine Principle embodied in the Cross of Christ as the Power of God.
This is far different than the book “Divine Principle” written by Rev. Moon which is a flawed masterpiece; and elucidates the exposition of the Key quite well in may places: but falls short in a few others; which I with John the Divine had to repair along with the service of Hyo Jin Moon from spirit world as the angel of the Covenant I have with Rev. Moon in the position of Saul; and Hyo Jin Moon now dead but raised in the position of Jonathan for whom John the Baptist was named: and I stand in the position of the singer; the child who is David.
And if I do point out the 3 Great Errors in Rev. Moon’s book “Divine Principle” on the pages where he has said what I know to be things that are plainly wrong I still insist on the roughly 75% of what is written in that book as being about 100% correct as being on target and true in every sense of the Word: thus I defend Rev. Moon on the one hand as knowing who is really is while also trying to get him to finally come to me so that the REAL Foundation for the Unification of World Christianity can be set up: and then the Unification of Humanity itself as well
 
And yet I also tell him in no uncertain terms what my Father Jesus has shown me by sending me his servant John (who is his best friend and personal messenger ) and why he revealed to me everything about Rev. Moon and his relationship to the Black race here in America as the Third Israel and it’s union with the White Race and then on this Foundation of Salvation then all the rest of mankind in the uncovering of still another Book: this one being the Revelation of Jesus Christ that John showed me is the Book of Life of the Lamb ITSELF: the Word of God that Rev. Moon keeps talking about as being where the Providence must at some point really begin with
 
Even so: I have now shown Unification Church theologians and professors that the Revelation has been given to me to reveal it to the world for just that reason starting at the Unification Church I have been as ignored by these figure in the Unification Church utterly regardless of the fact that I know exactly what I am talking about; just as; I suppose, Rev. Moon feels he was ignored even when he showed his grasp of the Old and New Testaments that was for his time of a veritable John the Baptist: of whom the Lamb had said:
………….Of men born of women there has not arisen a greater prophet
than John the Baptist ,,,”
……….. in and of itself a statement that certainly sums up what could and shall certainly be said of Rev. Moon by me in my book in THIS DAY: and no one outside of Rev. Moon’s church even now more than 3 decades later even sees it! They wrote him off here in the USA at the start because he was Korean: and way before they even gave him a chance; out-of-hand discrimination and head-in-sand ignorance at it’s finest.
 
What one might call a crying shame; and truly we live in dark times here at these Last Days; no further proof even being needed other than even the small evidence of just what I have shown here.
 
Answers about the Coming of the Messiah and the Messenger of Jehovah of Hosts called “the Priest”.
As we now are faced with the advance of events culminating in the Last Judgment here beginning at December 25th 2012 ( yes by all means quote me ) we are also face with the spectacle of Rev. Moon furiously backpedaling on the conventional idea of the Messiah with a explanation that seems to include being the Messiah but somehow dying and letting people go on exactly as before only with no Immortal Messiah or even any at all “at all”: just endless marrying and being given in marriage and his writings on being married and that’s it: finito.
 
Resurrection, Regeneration; a second coming: we will have none of that it seems!
 
Blowing Out the candles of faith….l

 

Advertisements

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God | Measure 144 / Missive #333 ~⊕~ * ~⊕~

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

Leader of Our Republic: the Moral Compass in the Hand of Bernie Sanders…

“….Today I spoke at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies about the problem of authoritarian nationalism threatening democratic societies, and the need to build a global progressive movement based on the principles of democracy, equality, and economic and environmental justice. I hope you’ll give my speech a listen and join me in the movement that stands behind a vision of shared prosperity, security and dignity for all people….”

============================

============================ 

Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

==========================================

“….What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process.

What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. ….”

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  

His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license

 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

 

 

Image may contain: 1 person, suit and text

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

==========================================

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

…I am black, but comely…..”

“…But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

=========================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said”

“Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life

and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange

that these same men treat human life

like the cheapest and most disposable resource

on the face of the Earth???”

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

The Endgame of Democracy, the Worshipers of the Image of the Beast: and the Unseen Destiny of the Republic: “The Empire Never Ended”….Philip K. Dick, the Illuminatus Trilogy……and the Manchild of the Third Israel: the Ideal of Utopia and the Events that Presage the Coming of the Kingdom of God

The Promise of the God of Love and Peace

“...I am black, but comely…..”

“...But they who endure to the End, the same shall be saved….”

 

Image may contain: one or more people and text

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanours of Kavanaugh

and the Senate-Trump Faction. Step-by-step Overthrow of the Rule of Law

The Subversive Nature of Civic Participation in the Face of Oppression 

“By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest,  adversed  to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community

– James Madison, Federalist Paper 10 

Despite the historic stakes of the ram-through appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States of a serial liar and alleged early rapist, who loudly denounces his Senate questioners as a “left-wing conspiracy” – sniffing all the time as ( of ) his ( coke ) habit – there has been no legal analysis of his abetted crimes of persistent false statements and declarations, and factional subversion of the rule of law and the US Constitution itself.

As law and moral philosophy professors writing just as the White-House-counsel controlled FBI ‘investigation’ is hidden under cover from citizens and the press, we are moved by duty to explain what has so far been lost in media melodrama, political cover-up at the highest levels, he-says-she-says reductions, and the politics of effectively usurping the rule of law in the United States.

As a branch of government it is unique from the other two branches of government – the legislative. and executive branches – in that the supreme Justices are arbiters of what is allowed or prevented by the US Constitution as  the ultimate source of the rule of law in America.  

All life-long appointees of the Supreme Court of the United States have a duty to exercise this supreme power, granted them by the people of the United States to protect and defend the rights of its citizens under the Constitution. As such, they are obliged to demonstrate legal impartiality and moral competence at the highest level in moral practice and public conduct.  

 

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

“…[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party.

The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties.

Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray.

Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true…..

Image result for cartoon

The Supreme Court appointment of Kavanaugh resembles

the operations of a hardened criminal gang

==============================================

Yet what if the entire process is led by a long train of proved false declarations,

persistently intentional misdirection, and perjury under oath with no restraint?

==============================================================

1.) What if in both candidate for office and his Senate and White-House-counsel managers fix an obstruction of truth and justice and refusal to answer questions throughout, and level non-stop attacks and slanderous accusations of anyone stepping in the way?

2.) What if all the while intimidation of all resistance up to threats of death against the testifying victim rise in the background and the US President himself reverses his endorsement of the credibility of the witness against Kavanaugh and uses his bully pulpit to mock her in a televised public speech at a political rally?

3.) What if the FBI itself is used as a covertly operating instrument whose report is manipulated and made secret to the public and the press? 

What if in all evident respects the process and appointment to the highest judicial office of the land operates like a criminal conspiracy with a vice-grip on all three branches of governmentin the words of Madison, the very definition of ‘tyranny’ – with now the Supreme Court itself fixed to ignore and override basic issues of justice and morality for the next generation in a situation of cumulatively unprecedented social and environmental crisis?  

We have already seen the unraveling of even the need to appear objective, disinterested, above the political mob mentality and thuggery of this ruling faction in one long train of abuses, false statements and lying with impunity under oath.

 

“…The reckless and grasping nature of the Kavanaugh appointment,

in short, shows an unbound faction of power

treating its position of tyrannical rule as its personal property and right….”

 

“…One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes.

But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official.

It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.”

The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees….”

 

 

 Step-by-step overthrow of the rule of law 

What has happened in Washington DC with the Kavanaugh hearings is of grave concern to anyone who believes in the democratic rule of law over a moneyed faction fixing all legal process. What this hearing and FBI investigation now controlled by the White House Counsel and ranking Senate Republicans shows is a series of non-stop false statements and actions that attack the very heart of our system of laws and poison the soul of the nation. 

In our considered legal and moral opinion, Kavanaugh’s continual false declarations and prevarications are grounds for impeachment in even his current position of Federal Court Judge.  

In our judgement, with which many will agree, Trump’s candidate Kavanaugh has incontestably demonstrated unfitness for any judicial or public office.  His speech and actions under oath, to the US Senate, is enough to be disbarred and lose his law license 

“…Kavanaugh has been so continuously coached

from the highest offices of the land

to act above the law in every regard

that this corrupt appointment reaches into the depths

of a ‘tyrannical faction

now in control of our federal government and institutions…”

Image result for cartoon

“…It has so overreached in it’s lawless and naked abuse of power

that only keeping the public in ignorance can allow it to continue

into the mid-term elections this November

– the acid test of US democracy which is now before us. …” 

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Matthew Stanton is a long practising Chicago attorney  and law professor, and John McMurtry is a moral philosopher and author whose work has been translated across the world. 

=============================================================================

REPUBLICANS HAVE DESTROYED SUPREME COURT

‘[…] As a young man––not yet a lawyer––I took for granted the Court’s role as an enforcer of national boundaries. The Court defended them by majorities that knew no party. The chief justice, Earl Warren, was a Republican politician who had run for vice president on his party’s ticket. The Court’s two leading liberals, William J. Brennan and Arthur Goldberg, were appointed by presidents from different parties. Lewis Powell, who became the Court’s swing justice, had spent his life in the service of business and established power, but when he took the bench, he defied the president who had elevated him.
[…]
But that idea began to fray. Opinion-writer politesse would require me to say or imply that the decay in the Court’s standing was the fault of “both sides,” or of both “right and left.”

But I cannot. It simply is not true.

One party made the Supreme Court a partisan issue. First Richard Nixon and then Ronald Reagan made attacks on the Court part of Republican Party dogma. Some will see the rejection of Judge Robert Bork by the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1987 as a product of partisanship; others may see it as one of its causes. But I think no fair-minded person could deny that a major barrier was crossed in 1991 when a Republican president, for political reasons, appointed a justice who was manifestly unqualified for the office, and who faced numerous, credible claims of sexual misbehavior as a government official. It was hard to watch the nominee testify in October 1991 without concluding that Anita Hill had told the truth and that Thomas had lied. But the administration pushed ahead regardless.

This was the first major step over a dangerous threshold.

The next step came in 2000, when five Republican appointees on the Court extended its authority to decide a national election, in defiance of federal statutes, the Constitution’s text, and their own frequently expressed pieties about “our federalism.” The Court has aggressively made itself part of partisan politics, but even then, some of the justices who dissented were Republican appointees.

Partisanship sputtered for the next decade and a half. John Roberts was confirmed as chief justice with the votes of 22 Democrats––half of the party’s Senate caucus. Samuel Alito was the object of an attempted filibuster by Democrats, but was still confirmed with four Democratic votes. Sonia Sotomayor won nine Republican votes; Elena Kagan got five Republican votes and lost one Democratic vote. Justice Anthony Kennedy continued to move back and forth within the Court across partisan lines.

As the new Court settled in, people began to wonder whether the wounds of 2000 might be closing.

Then, in 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.
(And Judge Merrick Garland nomination was stonewalled for 9 months by Republicans)

President Barack Obama, facing a Republican Senate, carefully nominated a moderate whom even Senator Orrin Hatch had previously designated as acceptable to both sides. But then the rules changed. 
Scalia’s seat, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, would not be filled, no matter what. Republicans had a majority in the Senate and could use it for any purpose they wished—including making the Supreme Court seat a plum partisan patronage job to be filled after the next presidential election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump assured Republican voters that he would appoint justices who would “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade. To make this clearer, he released a short list of nominees, in effect putting their names on the presidential ballot besides his. Another threshold was crossed: A Court seat was a partisan prize, its holders subject to popular vote.
[…]
The answer, when it came—from the nominee Brett Kavanaugh, from his supporters, and finally and most shockingly from Trump himself—was a perfect whirlwind of male aggression and dominance. 
The aim, which was largely successful, was simply to remove Ford from the equation and turn the subject to raw power and its prerogatives. 
The debate and the vote that followed were not about the Court, not about the law; they were about the Republican Party. They were about teaching the rest of us that we cannot refuse what Trump and McConnell want. They were a demonstration that in the new order there is no individual, no norm, no institution not subject to the control of the ruling party.[…]

Thanks to Cynthia F. Davidson

=======================================================================

In looking at the earth being turned into a total Desolation, we have to remember God said he would not destroy the earth again right after the Flood…and the Sign of that Covenant and Promise was set as the Rainbow…in a Cloud

But God never said Mankind did not have the Free Will to destroy ourselves, and Satan has done a pretty good job in destroying this planet hoping that by the time my Father Jesus arrives to collect his inheritance, all that will be left is a burnt potato chip that once was the Earth.

Like a child that breaks a toy when he has had to give it back, Satan is dropping the oxygen level by having his deluded psychopaths pour more Fossil Fuel smoke and ash into the sky in his creature Trumps mad dash to destroy the Ecosphere as quickly as possible……….when the Air we all breath goes much below 15% oxygen the brain starts to shut down… death follows if much lower than 7%……right now we are hovering at around 20%

Water is Life…but the Air is like the Spirit of Life

Be not too surprised that a man like the President, and his new Supreme Court Un-justice, both like to rape and pillage and assault women, just as does the Climate Denying Government and its Maleficent Corporations that gleefully rape and pillage and destroy the earth.,.an allegory of Trumps own corporate greed and, by analogy, the fitting symbol of the attitude of his total disrespect of women in exactly the degree to where he or his masters have no respect for life on this planet… whether personally raping women or of Raping the Earth…the attitude of Trump and the Corporations / Beasts of the Earth he champions to the detriment of all… are one-and-the-same …,

Those who give life discarnate to an inanimate object by letting it accrue interest, as though it indeed lives and breathes only do so when this dead matter, blindly given abstract value by Mammon that we call “money” outweighs the true value of human life.

How is it then that that which is alive serves and obeys that which is intrinsically dead ???

Sayed Idries Shah once said “Men in authority constantly talk and prattle about the sacred value of human life and its accomplishments and importance, but isn’t it strange that these same men treat human life like the cheapest and most disposable resource on the face of the Earth???”

 

Ah yes……can there be ANY doubt….????

Who set Up The Image of the Beast with Donald Trump ?? The JuJu of Omarosa Manigault Newman, the Priestess of the White Crow of Osiris: Jim Crow | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~⊕~ Index A

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

 Who Set Up the Image of the Beast???

Omarosa Manigault Newman

Image result for omarosa manigault

In the Revelation of my Father Jesus, the Lamb’s Book,  it tells in chapter 14 the fate of all those who end up loving and believing a lie: the Image of the Beast representing this very thing; the Image of the Axis Beast of Nazism now Worshiped by all the Southern Racist Reprobate Children of the Father of Lies, Unamerican in their Racism and Bigotry; Antichristian in their Words and their Actions.

They Pride themselves in being the Red “Trump” States of the Original 13 Confederate South who fought in the Civil War against the North.

The Fate they have earned for themselves is unknown to them, because the Day of the Lord…that of the Last Judgment on Judgment Day……comes unheralded into the World. For this reason it is described by both Peter and Paul as ” …. a thief in the Night…”

They who worship Trump are of the Camp of that Racist Strumpet South and her White Jim Crow Lover who now Parades at endless Rallies in the South land and has fundraising Fests  in the Southern White House, is even now preparing to End Free Speech and steal the Midterms if at all possible; with the help from their Russian Hacker friends…prepared to go for all the marbles… and to remove anything which stands in their Golden Calf’s way…

But in this unknown and unseen Day both he and they who worshiped him are delivered to the Lake of Fire, prepared for “All Liars…and Whosoever Maketh or Loveth a Lie….”

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

Former Top KGB General Says Trump is a Russian Asset and he Likely Knows it

As Special Counsel Robert Mueller continues his probe into whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to meddle in the 2016 presidential election, a new book is about to be released which claims that Trump has been compromised by Russia for over three decades.
Daily Mail reports that a new book by Craig Unger, entitled ‘House of Trump, House of Putin; the Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia‘, claims that President Trump is and has been a Russian asset since 1987In 1987 Donald Trump travelled to Moscow, and Unger says that the former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, Oleg Kalugin, insists that Trump would have very likely been filmed with prostitutes at that time, saying that Trump had ‘many young ladies at his disposal’ and that Russian spies would have jumped at the opportunity.Kalugin also claims that Trump is an easy ‘Russian asset’ considering how greedy he has been over the years.  He goes as far as saying that Trump is most likely aware of the existence of blackmail material often referred to as ‘kompromat’.

If Russia was likely willing to gather ‘kompromat’ on Trump 31 years ago, it would seem to give further credence to the Steele Dossier which claims that Russia had gathered ‘kompromat’ on Trump back in 2013 as well. 

It’s worth noting that no proof of this blackmail material was provided to Unger by Kalugin — only his opinion on what most

likely would have taken place at the time of Trump’s visit to Moscow.

The book also looks into Trump’s other ties to shady Russian officials and businessmen dating back to the 1970s.  It will be released on August 14th.

———————————————————————————————–

White Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that

“the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore.

Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants

—————————————————————-

KKK-ENDORSED  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS III !!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………………………………………………….”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On

and On….

as also

 

 

 

the narrative in Europe 

 

 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

The Prophetic Truth….

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

 

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

 

 

 

The Coming of the Kingdom and the GOP Nazi “Dog in the Manger”: Southern Antichristianity, the Father of Lies: and the White “Jim Crow” of Donald “J” Trump | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~ ⊕ ~

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

KKK-ENDORSED  !!!  DONALD J TRUMP APPROVED !!!  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS DEMONSTRATED!!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

———————————————————————————————–

Image may contain: 1 person, textWhite Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump is having a meet-and-greet with his constituents. ….. then they’re having a barbecue on the South Lawn ….. no biggie…

The Cross Burning will be the Main Attraction at the close, Jeff Sessions presiding……. the entire GOP will be there…in their white robes of office

—————————————————————-

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………..”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On and On….as also the narrative in Europe 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

“…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

 

 

 

The Coming of the Kingdom and the GOP Nazi “Dog in the Manger”: Southern Antichristianity, the Father of Lies: and the White “Jim Crow” of Donald “J” Trump | Measure 144 ~ Missive 333 ~ ⊕

⊕ ” Do not wonder that I know all languages since I know what men do not say..”                                                       

                                                                                                      Apollonius of Tyana     

KKK-ENDORSED  !!!  DONALD J TRUMP APPROVED !!!  JEFFERSON “DAVIS” BEAUREGARD SESSIONS DEMONSTRATED!!!

Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist

It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader David Duke !!!

Laura Ingraham joins Tucker Carlson in explaining that “changing demographics” are destroying America.

Fox News Now Airs Unabashed Alt Right Propaganda

———————————————————————————————–

Image may contain: 1 person, textWhite Nationalism

in

Primetime !!!

JEFF SESSIONS GIVES HATE GROUPS A CIVIL WELCOME

————————————————————

Trump is having a meet-and-greet with his constituents. ….. then they’re having a barbecue on the South Lawn ….. no biggie…

The Cross Burning will be the Main Attraction at the close, Jeff Sessions presiding……. the entire GOP will be there…in their white robes of office

—————————————————————-

“Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now….”

Times, Time…and a half of Time…

and the End of Time

……………………………………………………………….”...I saw Lucifer fall from Heaven as Lightning…”

And On and On….as also the narrative in Europe 

In Reality we have a Black Genocide going on in America..sanctioned by the deafening silence from the Oval Office, a Prophetic Sign that one of the Times we are living in is that in which Pharaoh had all the First Born Male Israelites downed in the Nile as soon as they were born…

Young Black Males killed in “legal lynchings” in which 10 year old black children are murdered without hesitation for little or no reason…certainly nothing which would ever happen to a white child…

This genocide…the REAL one…by the KKK and White Supremacists that infiltrated all levels of law enforcement, mainly in the South… as the FBI wrote of in it’s conclusive study…largely ignored; as of a coordinated effort to harass, intimidate and kill black people: an “open season” on minorities…….of what demographic I document as the Third Israel that came into existence in 1967 with the Black Evil Rights Movement and the White Anti War Opposition becoming emeshed together due to the mutuality of the direction…….and finally united in an event in which the 10 Tribes were reunited with those 2 of California at Beth -El……the House of God.

“THE HOUSE OF DAVID AS GOD.”

This was the Baby Boomers, but the place that ended being called Woodstock for that 3 Day Separation from Satan, just as once before in the Exodus there was 3 Days of Light on the Side of the Children of the Hebrew Ghetto Goshen……and three days of Darkness for the Egyptian side…

About the same number gathered at Beth-El……as before in the Exodus from Egypt…conservatively estimated at 650.000

Thus the 400 / 430 years of captivity the Israelites had suffered in Egypt, became the number of years the Black Race has suffered in America since 1500: the year when Columbus returned from his initial discovery in 1492, this time with with a Spanish Armada…and began the genocide of the Island Indians

In the Dimensional parallel of the 430 years of the Jews captivity in Egypt we must see the 430 years after 1500 we had a signal event occur: in 1929 we had Martin Luther King born with a CRASH…as that of the sinking of many ships, with entire family fortunes wiped out…..

But there is little doubt he represented the Moses of this Exodus…as of taking “Egypt from within” in New Unification Church Theology.

This happened in Rome, where after 430 years of persecution Christianity became the State Religion.

The pattern was therefore set of Internal Restoration, which Dr. King Walked, right up to Memphis.the City of Destruction

At any rate, in time indemnity the National Policy of Egypt was that all male Israelites were to be drowned upon birth…Racism at the National Level.

So, just as it was in Ancient Egypt, we see once again a national and systemic policy of extermination in America where young black males are therefore targeted from birth for incarceration and then after turning them into hardened criminals in the brutality of our prisons they are then marked for death…always Single Black Males are hunted down and killed without question…upon the flimsiest of grounds….

But in Egypt the parallel goes even deeper, as to the question of the racial majority slowly becoming a minority…a when the Jews multiplied so well they began to become numerically predominant the native Egyptian noticed they were being supplanted in their own country by a foreign race who were now racially dominant, due to their ancestor Joseph having made his sons the caretakers and executors of the estate of Egypt as Governors appointed by Pharaoh..

“…A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities….”

The Trump Era does have one upside: people now feel comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud. You no longer have to decipher what they’re really about—they’ll just tell you straight-up. That’s why it’s a more and more common experience to wake up and see that one of the fabulously rich resentment-peddlers on the president’s favorite news network spent the previous evening spouting unabashed white nationalism on-air.

Usually, it’s Tucker Carlson who pops up on Fox News to rail against “demographic changes” in America—that is, non-white people immigrating here. That kind of rhetoric has earned Carlson praise from Richard Spencer and David Duke.

But Laura Ingraham certainly gave Carlson a run for his money Wednesday night, unleashing a nakedly white nationalist rant that suggested “the America we know and love” has been destroyed by “massive demographic changes” due to both illegal and legal immigration:

This is no longer a dogwhistle.

Ingraham is saying outright that allowing non-white people to come here—and, down the line, threaten the majority power enjoyed by White America—is tantamount to destroying America. In this formulation, what defines the United States is its whiteness, or at least the idea that white people are at the center of American life. Which they are, for now.

To Ingraham, America is not a daring experiment in self-government based on the principles of liberty, equality before the law, and self-determination, which anyone can be a part of if they work hard and buy into these values. White people got here first—ignore those pesky Native Americans!—so it’s white people’s turf.

Like the Trump administrationwhich has tried to cut even legal immigration by any means possible, Ingraham is no longer pantomiming about how illegal immigration is the problem. The problem for these folks is that Certain People are coming here, full stop.

They want more people from Norway, or they don’t want anyone coming at all. You can tell because Ingraham backed her soliloquy with footage of…people farming? That seems like a pretty traditional American activity. Ah, but everyone featured in the video playing as you say “the America we know and love” is gone…is Latino.

And now you’re showing people climbing a border fence.

image

“None of us ever voted for” this, Ingraham said, apparently pining for the time of

the Chinese Exclusion Act. No one needs to vote in favor of new people coming to America.

It is the story of America.

 

This discussion used to center on how we can better enforce our immigration laws.

Now it’s about whether anyone should be allowed in at all.

Ingraham went on to highlight the case of one undocumented immigrant who

committed child rape as part of an attack on Philadelphia as a sanctuary city.

 

This is a classic ploy among propagandists—to highlight one horrific occurrence and

present it as representative of an entire group.

 

That is why the president, and Fox News, continually highlight MS-13 when discussing immigration,

even though MS-13 makes up a tiny percentage of immigrantsand of the nation’s gang members—and

undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native citizens.

 

(Meanwhile, ICE arrests of noncriminal immigrants have skyrocketed.)

 

Oh, and the very basis for the current immigration crisis is bunk: 

illegal border crossings are at historic lows, a fraction of the level during the 1990s.

But none of that matters to the Fox News resentment hounds.

They’re railing against legal immigration now.

 

A new studypicked up by Vox,

indicates that reminding white people they are losing majority status—and power—due to

changing demographics in America makes them more hostile to social safety net programs

that benefit poor minorities.

 

Fox News has known this for decades, and has sold white resentment as a primary product.

After all, it serves a double purpose: give viewers what they want,

and turn them towards policies favored by the corporate class that actually makes Republican Party policy.

Conservatives Rally Together At Annual CPAC Gathering

Ingraham at CPAC

Getty ImagesChip Somodevilla
But perhaps the most telling part of Ingraham's monologue last night came 
before the true white nationalist section. It came as she took on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
the Democratic Socialist from New York who seems to drive right-wingers a special brand of insane. 

Surely it's a coincidence that it was Ocasio-Cortez, 
an increasingly powerful Puerto Rican star in Democratic politics, 
who launched Ingraham on this rant about the demographic destruction of America.

Anyway, the Fox host had this to say:

As if she knows all of America from her loft in Queens.

This really has it all.

There’s the “loft” description to suggest Ocasio-Cortez is living the lap of luxury,

even though Queens is far from New York’s wealthiest bureau.

 

On the flip side, Ingraham is worth tens of millions of dollars,

and like every other Populist Conservative Personality, is set up in a major coastal city.

(Ingraham’s studio is in Washington, D.C.

So is Carlson’s. Tomi Lahren lives in Los Angeles. Sean Hannity works out of Manhattan.)

 

But then there’s the idea Queens is not part of Real America.

The subtext here, of course, is that Queens is some alien entity.

But there are Real American White People in Queens,

too—they just live alongside people with roots all over the world.

 

One three-block section of Queens is home to people who came there from 51 nations,

the vast majority of whom came here to work hard and find a better life for themselves and their families.

To those who believe America is a nation for anyone willing to buy into the values and the

promise of the American Experiment, of course Queens is Real America.

So, too, is Iowa, so long as being an Iowan is about what you believe and how you behave,

not your complexion or when your great-grandfather got off the boat.

 

                                        White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast.

“This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.” 

 

On the base it says these words: “FATIMA” as of Mary of Fatima; even “Maryam al Kubra”; she who is:
“The Greater Mary” of that New Golden Gate   

Fox News host says ‘the America we know and love’ is being wiped out by immigrants. Former KKK leader agrees with her.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday night monologue about immigrants destroying America was so racist it got the endorsement of David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

During the opening to her primetime show The Ingraham Angle, Ingraham complained that “the America we know and love doesn’t exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people,” she said, in the form of documented and undocumented immigrants.

David Duke and White Genocide

It should be no surprise that Ingraham’s rhetoric got the endorsement of an open white supremacist.

Ingraham’s fellow Fox News host Tucker Carlson also echoed white nationalist rhetoric when he said immigrants were leading tothe collapse of the American family in June.

THE MYTH OF WHITE PERSECUTION AND THE ATTACK UPON CHRISTIANITY

Ingraham and Carlson’s monologues borrowed the rhetoric of what white nationalists falsely call “white genocide,” an innuendo that refers to racist fears about people of color coming to outnumber white people in the United States.

A large segment of white nationalists also hitch their fears to the claim that the left and/or Jewish people are encouraging immigration to dilute the white race.

“White supremacists talk a lot about the inherent threat posed by immigrants and refugees, particularly those of color,” she previously told The Daily Beast. “This is obviously a shout-out to the sense that white supremacists have of being under siege. It’s a shout-out to the concept of white genocide, which is a popular trope among white supremacists and it’s something they use as a recruiting tool: a sense of fear of the other.”

 

 

 

 

The Bell tolls…for Trump??? | Measure 144 ~ # 333 ~ addendum

People are not aware

 

The 555 of GDE on December 24th, 2012: and the 55 of CWD

Emails in 2016 between former British spy Christopher Steele and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr suggest Steele was deeply concerned about the legal status of a Putin-linked Russian oligarch, and at times seemed to be advocating on the oligarch’s behalf, in the same time period Steele worked on collecting the Russia-related allegations against Donald Trump that came to be known as the Trump dossier. The emails show Steele and Ohr were in frequent contact, that they intermingled talk about Steele’s research and the oligarch’s affairs, and that Glenn Simpson, head of the dirt-digging group Fusion GPS that hired Steele to compile the dossier, was also part of the ongoing conversation.

The emails, given to Congress by the Justice Department, began on Jan. 12, 2016, when Steele sent Ohr a New Year’s greeting. Steele brought up the case of Russian aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska (referred to in various emails as both OD and OVD), who was at the time seeking a visa to attend an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in the United States. Years earlier, the U.S. revoked Deripaska’s visa, reportedly on the basis of suspected involvement with Russian organized crime. Deripaska was close to Paul Manafort, the short-term Trump campaign chairman now on trial for financial crimes, and this year was sanctioned in the wake of Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election.

“I heard from Adam WALDMAN [a Deripaska lawyer/lobbyist] yesterday that OD is applying for another official US visa ice [sic] APEC business at the end of February,” Steele wrote in the Jan. 12 email. Steele said Deripaska was being “encouraged by the Agency guys who told Adam that the USG [United States Government] stance on [Deripaska] is softening.” Steele concluded: “A positive development it seems.”

Steele also asked Ohr when he might be coming to London, or somewhere in Europe, “as I would be keen to meet up here and talk business.” Ohr replied warmly the same day and said he would likely travel to Europe, but not the U.K., at least twice in February.

Steele emailed again on Feb. 8 to alert Ohr that “our old friend OD apparently has been granted another official [emphasis in original] visa to come to the US later this month.” Steele wrote, “As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise.” Ohr replied that he knew about Deripaska’s visa, and “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.” Steele again asked to meet anytime Ohr was in the U.K. or Western Europe.

Steele wrote again on Feb. 21 in an email headlined “Re: OVD – Visit To The US.” Steele told Ohr he had talked to Waldman and to Paul Hauser, who was Deripaska’s London lawyer. Steele reported that there there would be a U.S. government meeting on Deripaska that week — “an inter-agency meeting on him this week which I guess you will be attending.” Steele said he was “circulating some recent sensitive Orbis reporting” on Deripaska that suggested Deripaska was not a “tool” of the Kremlin. Steele said he would send the reporting to a name that is redacted in the email, “as he has asked, for legal reasons I understand, for all such reporting be filtered through him (to you at DoJ and others).”

Deripaska’s rehabilitation was a good thing, Steele wrote: “We reckon therefore that the forthcoming OVD contact represents a good opportunity for the USG.” Ohr responded by saying, “Thanks Chris! This is extremely interesting. I hope we can follow up in the next few weeks as you suggest.”

Steele was eager to see Ohr face to face. On March 17, Steele wrote a brief note asking if Ohr had any update on plans to visit Europe “in the near term where we could meet up.” Ohr said he did not and asked if Steele would like to set up a call. It is not clear whether a call took place.

There are no emails for more than three months after March 17. Then, on July 1, came the first apparent reference to Donald Trump, then preparing to accept the Republican nomination for president. “I am seeing [redacted] in London next week to discuss ongoing business,” Steele wrote to Ohr, “but there is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!” Steele said he had planned to come to the U.S. soon, but now it looked like it would not be until August. He needed to talk in the next few days, he said, and suggested getting together by Skype before he left on holiday. Ohr suggested talking on July 7. Steele agreed.

Ohr’s phone log for July 7 notes, “Call with Chris Steele” from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. eastern time.

(A caution here: It is possible the “favourite business tycoon” could be Deripaska, or perhaps even someone else, and not Trump. But no one referred to Deripaska in that way anywhere else in the communications. Also, Steele made it clear the “tycoon” subject was separate from other business. And July 1 was just before Steele met with the FBI with the first installment of the Trump dossier. So it appears reasonable, given Steele’s well-known obsession with Trump, and unless information emerges otherwise, to see the “favourite business tycoon” as Trump.)

On the morning of Friday, July 29, Steele wrote to say that he would “be in DC at short notice on business” later that day and Saturday. He asked if Ohr and wife Nellie were free for breakfast on Saturday morning. They were, and agreed to meet for breakfast at the Mayflower Hotel in downtown Washington.

Ohr’s log of contacts with Steele lists a meeting with Steele on July 30. Steele finished installments of the dossier on July 19 and 26.

On Aug. 22, Ohr received an email from Simpson with the subject line “Can u ring.” There was no message beyond a phone number. Ohr’s log lists some sort of contact — it’s not specified what — with Simpson on Aug. 22.

Steele finished an installment of the dossier on Aug. 22.

Steele dated three installments of the dossier on Sept. 14. On Sept. 16, Steele wrote Ohr to say that he would be back in Washington soon “on business of mutual interest.” Ohr said he would be out of town Sept. 19-21. On Sept. 21, Steele wrote to say he was in Washington and was “keen to meet up with you.” The two agreed to have breakfast on Sept. 23. Meeting on that date would be “more useful,” Steele said, “after my scheduled meetings” the day before. It’s not clear what those scheduled meetings were. Ohr’s log lists a meeting with Steele on Sept. 23.

On October 18, Steele emailed Ohr at 6:51 a.m. with a pressing matter. “If you are in Washington today, I have something quite urgent I would like to discuss with you, preferably by Skype (even before work if you can).” Steele wrote. Ohr suggested they do it immediately. “Thanks Bruce. 2 mins,” Steele replied. Ohr’s log lists a call with Steele on Oct. 18.

There is no note on what they discussed. But a few hours later, still on Oct. 18, Steele emailed Ohr again, and the subject was related to Deripaska. “Further to our Skypecon earlier today,” Steele wrote, Hauser had asked Steele to forward to Ohr information about a dispute between the government of Ukraine and RUSAL, Deripaska’s aluminum company. “Naturally, he [Hauser] wants to protect the client’s [Deripaska’s] interests and reputation,” Steele wrote. “I pass it on for what it’s worth.”

After another few hours had passed, Ohr asked if Steele had time for a Skype call. Steele said, let’s do it now. Ohr’s log lists calls with Steele on Oct. 18 and 19.

Steele finished dossier installments on Oct. 18, 19, and 20. The installment on Oct. 18 was the infamous Russians-offer-Carter-Page-millions-of-dollars allegation, and the ones on Oct. 19 and 20 concerned Manafort’s alleged role in an alleged collusion scheme.

On Nov. 21, other players entered the conversation. Ohr received an an email from Kathleen Kavalec, a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of European Affairs in the State Department. (Kavalec is now President Trump’s nominee to be ambassador to Albania.) Kavalec sent Ohr information on Simon Kukes, a Russian-born executive who contributed more than $250,000 to Trump-supporting organizations after Trump won the Republican nomination. Kavalec said she met Kukes around 2014, when “Tom Firestone brought him in,” a reference to former Justice Department official Thomas Firestone, now a partner at the Washington law firm BakerHostetler. Kavalec also linked to a Mother Jones article about Kukes.

Ohr responded by saying, “I may have heard about him from Tom Firestone as well, but I can’t recall for certain.” Then Kavalec answered by saying she was “just re-looking at my notes from my convo with Chris Steele” and that “I see that Chris said Kukes has some connection to Serge Millian, an emigre who is identified by FT as head of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce.” [In the book Russian Roulette, authors Michael Isikoff and David Corn wrote that Millian claimed to have some sort of business relationship with the Trump organization — which the Trumps denied. More importantly, Millian went on to become Steele’s source for the infamous “golden showers” allegation that Donald Trump had engaged in a kinky sex scene in a Moscow hotel room in 2013.]

Ohr’s phone log indicates that he called Simpson on Dec. 8 to set up a meeting for coffee the next day, Dec. 9.

There is not another email until Dec. 11. Simpson sent Nellie Ohr a link to an article in the left-wing ThinkProgress headlined, “Why has the NRA been cozying up to Russia?” The article focused on now-indicted Russian agent Maria Butina and Russian Alexander Torshin. Nellie Ohr responded, “Thank you!” to which Simpson, the next day, answered, “Please ring if you can.” Nellie Ohr forwarded the Simpson message to Bruce Ohr, saying, “I assume Glenn means you not me.”

Ohr’s phone log on Dec. 13 said, “Glenn Simpson. Some more news. Yesterday 9:27 a.m. Spoke with him.”

Steele dated a dossier installment Dec. 13.

On Jan. 20, 2017, inauguration day, Bruce Ohr received an email from Simpson that said simply, “Can you call me please?”

The emails raise a clear question of whether Steele was working, directly or indirectly, with Oleg Deripaska at the same time Steele was compiling the dossier — and whether the Justice Department, along with Simpson and Fusion GPS, was part of the project. Given Deripaska’s place in the Russian power structure, what that means in the big picture is unclear.

On Feb. 9 of this year, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley wrote a letter to Hauser, the London lawyer, and asked, “Is it the case that Mr. Steele, through you, works or has worked on behalf of Mr. Deripaska or businesses associated with him?”

Hauser refused to answer, claiming such information was privileged. But he added: “I can confirm that neither my firm nor I was involved in the commissioning of, preparation of or payment for the so-called ‘Steele Dossier.’ I am not aware of any involvement by Mr. Deripaska in commissioning, preparing or paying for that document.”

On Feb. 14, at an open hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton asked FBI Director Christopher Wray about Deripaska.

“Is it fair to call him a Putin-linked Russian oligarch?” asked Cotton.

“Well, I’ll leave that characterization to others, and certainly not in this setting,” Wray said.

“Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, last week sent a letter to a London-based lawyer who represents Mr. Deripaska,” Cotton continued, “and asked if Christopher Steele was employed, either directly or indirectly, by Oleg Deripaska at the time he was writing the so-called Steele dossier. Do you know if Christopher Steele worked for Oleg Deripaska?’

“That’s not something I can answer,” Wray said.

“Could we discuss it in a classified setting?”

“There might be more we could say there,” Wray answered.

The newly-released Ohr-Steele-Simpson emails are just one part of the dossier story. But if nothing else, they show that there is still much for the public to learn about the complex and far-reaching effort behind it.

SHORTLY AFTER PRESIDENT Donald Trump was inaugurated last year, top Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy offered Russian gas giant Novatek a $26 million lobbying plan aimed at removing the company from a U.S. sanctions list, according to documents obtained by The Intercept.

Broidy is a Trump associate who was deputy finance chair of the Republican National Committee until he resigned last week amid reports that he had agreed to pay $1.6 million to a former Playboy model with whom he had an affair. But in February 2017, when he laid out his lobbying proposal for Novatek, he was acting as a well-connected businessman and longtime Republican donor in a bid to help the Russian company avoid sanctions imposed by the Obama administration. The 2014 sanctions were aimed at punishing Russia for annexing Crimea and supporting pro-Russia separatists in eastern Ukraine.

In February 2017, Broidy sent a draft of the plan by email to attorney Andrei Baev, then a Moscow- and London-based lawyer who represented major Russian energy companies for the firm Chadbourne & Parke LLP. Baev had already been communicating with Novatek about finding a way to lift U.S. sanctions.

Broidy proposed arranging meetings with key White House and congressional leaders and generating op-eds and other articles favorable to the Russian company, along with a full suite of lobbying activities to be undertaken by consultants brought on board. Yet even as he offered those services, Broidy was adamant that his company, Fieldcrest Advisors LLC, would not perform lobbying services but would hire others to do it. He suggested that parties to the deal sign a sweeping non-disclosure agreement that would shield their work from public scrutiny.

The plan is outlined in a series of emails and other documents obtained by The Intercept. Broidy and Baev did not dispute the authenticity of the exchanges but said the deal was never consummated.

In March, Bloomberg News reported that Broidy “offered last year to help a Moscow-based lawyer” — Baev — “get Russian companies removed from a U.S. sanctions list.” The news outlet did not identify the Russian firms or provide details of that proposal.

“At the time when I was a partner of Chadbourne & Parke LLP I had very preliminary discussions with Elliott Broidy with regard to possible engagement of him as a strategic consultant with regard to a possible instruction by one of my corporate clients. This instruction has never materialized,” Baev told The Intercept in an email. “Nor did I or Chadbourne provide any services to any other individual or entity in connection with any attempt to remove any Russian company or an individual from the US sanctions list.”

Broidy told The Intercept through a spokesperson that Baev had approached him about the proposal, but that Broidy had decided not to go through with it for political reasons. “At the time Mr. Baev had approached us he was then a managing partner of a major U.S. law firm and the new Administration had indicated an interest in normalizing relations with Russia and potentially easing sanctions,” Broidy told The Intercept in a statement provided by his spokesperson. “Subsequently, the geopolitical landscape changed and I made the decision not to pursue it.”

Baev was introduced to Broidy in October 2016, before Trump was elected. At the time, Broidy was serving as a top fundraiser for the Trump campaign; he would later become vice chair of Trump’s inaugural committee before transitioning to his most recent position at the RNC.

Broidy began sharing drafts of his lobbying plan with Baev by December. That month, he also sent Baev a Wall Street Journal article headlined “France Poised for Pro-Russia Pivot.”

The article describes how François Fillon and Marine Le Pen, the center-right and far-right candidates, respectively, during the 2017 French presidential election, both opposed punitive sanctions levied by French President François Hollande against Russia for its activity in eastern Ukraine. “With U.S. President-elect Donald Trump also promising friendlier relations with Moscow, Western agreement on sanctions against Russia could crumble,” the article says. Fillon and Le Pen were eventually defeated by France’s current president, Emmanuel Macron.

As the discussions continued, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and others began pushing legislation that would take the decision on whether to lift sanctions out of Trump’s hands and put Congress in control, a development that Novatek apparently recognized as a threat given that Broidy’s power to affect policy lay in his presumed influence with Trump.

In January 2017, Baev wrote to Broidy asking whether McCain’s bill would put their efforts at risk. “The client is asking how our road map would be affected by a new bill sponsored by Senator McCain to codify the existing sanctions and to impose new ones as a matter of federal law which the Administration will not be in a position to lift without consent of the US Congress. What are your thoughts on this?”

Broidy responded: “We need to convince McCain to abandon or water down the bill while we push the admin and other members of Senate to water down and vote no. Not a game changer.”

In a proposal dated February 23, 2017, Broidy told Baev that he had found “many influential experts, lobbyists, and attorneys” who were “willing and able to work immediately on your behalf and on behalf of Novatek.” The document, marked “strictly-confidential, attorney client privilege,” lays out a plan for a two-year influence campaign that Broidy claimed could dilute McCain’s bill and lift sanctions by February 2019.

The plan outlines a 25-step “Roadmap” that includes getting buy-in from congressional Foreign Relations committees, as well as outreach to the White House, the Treasury, and the Commerce, State, and Justice departments.

It also lists “issues for Congress” that would have to be overcome in order to implement the plan, including progress on agreements to resolve the situation in Ukraine. Congress would also “need information as to whether Russia did indeed hack DNC and attempt to influence US Presidential election,” according to the document.

Broidy added: “Congress would require agreement with Russia that Russia will not do so again.”

Elliott Broidy Russia Novatek Proposal5 pages

Broidy proposed a one-time fee of $500,000 to Fieldcrest, followed by monthly payments starting at $300,000 and eventually rising to $500,000. He proposed an additional monthly $300,000 for “attorneys, lobbyists, experts and other consultants that Fieldcrest Advisors will recommend.” The documents include a chart estimating the expenses for the next three years:

Baev told The Intercept that the conversations were preliminary in nature and that he and Broidy spoke of their own volition. “Neither I nor Chadbourne & Parke LLP has ever been instructed by any Russian company or individual to represent them in connection with this matter,” he said in an email. “For ethical reasons, I cannot address whether I was asked to perform any such services, but whether I or the firm was contacted or not, we were never engaged to perform these services and never performed them.”

The documents show, however, that Novatek asked Baev to discuss retaining Broidy to help the company get off the sanctions list, and Novatek appears to have specifically referenced Broidy’s proposal in doing so. In February, Baev had received a letter from Denis Solovev, the director of communications for Novatek, marked “confidential.”

“I am authorized by the management of Novatek to contact you and express our interest in your services related to removing Novatek from the US sanctions list,” wrote Solovev. “We would like to discuss with you your proposed road map.”

Throughout the documents and correspondence, Broidy articulates a desire to avoid publicly registering under the Lobbying Disclosure Act or the Foreign Agent Registration Act — laws that require influence peddlers to be transparent about who is funding their lobbying campaigns, and, in the case of FARA, whom they are speaking to. In an effort to avoid such disclosures, Broidy proposed that he and his consulting company, Fieldcrest, would “advise on the creation of an appropriate team” and “provide advice and manage coordination of the team.” “Fieldcrest is not a ‘lobbyist’ or registered ‘foreign agent’ and … at no time would be acting in such capacities,” Broidy noted in his outline, which also suggests that each team member be required to sign a confidentiality and non-disparagement form.

One hiccup came when Broidy sought legal advice about the plan. Elliot Berke, an attorney and managing partner at Berke Farah LLP, reviewed Broidy’s proposal and flagged the avoidance of lobbying registration as a problem. “Fieldcrest offers a somewhat detailed ‘Roadmap,’ which in and of itself could be viewed as providing strategic advice to influence US policy,” Berke wrote to Broidy in February, suggesting that he may have already run afoul of FARA. “The fee amounts and scope also would not support a claim that Fieldcrest’s activities would be limited to non-FARA-registrable administrative activities.” Berke also noted that “some of the characterizations” in the plan “could be construed to suggest that Fieldcrest has already engaged in registrable activity.”

Berke closed the letter: “Not the conclusion you were hoping for, I know, but happy to discuss more next week.”

Broidy consulted Berke Farah to ensure that his plan was legal, and the answer he received was a factor in the decision not to move forward with the agreement, according to his statement to The Intercept. “As with any matter, I took early steps to ensure that any proposed engagement, if one had gone forward, was in compliance with all applicable laws, which is why I consulted with my attorneys. As I’ve consistently stated though, I did not wish to be a lobbyist or FARA agent and would have declined any engagement requiring such steps.”

Berke did not respond to a request for comment from The Intercept.

Broidy has worked to funnel money into the U.S. political system for others, however. Last month, the Associated Press reported that Broidy received millions of dollars from George Nadar, a witness in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation and a close confidant of Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed. AP reported that Broidy received that money weeks before he made personal donations to congressional campaigns in an effort to shape a bill critical of Qatar, which the United Arab Emirates is currently blockading. The New York Times also reportedthat Broidy was reimbursed by Nadar after he funded an October conference that was highly critical of Qatar, which was confirmed by documents obtained by The Intercept. The UAE has contracts with a private security company Broidy owns that are worth “hundreds of millions of dollars,” according to the Times.

Broidy has blamed Qatar for the hack and disclosure of his emails. His attorney wrote a public letter to the Qatari ambassador to the U.S. blaming the Gulf nation for spreading “false and stolen information about him,” and claiming that Broidy had “irrefutable forensic evidence tying Qatar to this unlawful attack.” Broidy has since filed a lawsuit seeking damages from the Qatari government.

The Qatari Embassy did not respond to The Intercept’s requests for comment. The documents were provided to The Intercept anonymously.

Top photo: Russian President Vladimir Putin, center, accompanied by Novatek founder Leonid Mikhelson, second left, and Russia’s energy minister Alexander Novak, left, visits a liquefied natural gas plant in the port of Sabetta on the Yamal peninsula beyond the Arctic Circle on Dec. 8, 2017.