====That which “is” and “is not”=======
The Story of Rev. Moon’s
clever use, and misuse of Scripture,
from the Old and New Testaments
Rev. Moon knew what he was doing, when he cherry-picked his way through the Gospel, but few indeed ever sat down and checked his sources and the context in which he took them, which I will now show were wrong in every way: which he then misused to apply his own private interpretation to what he wrote about the Restoration, and with such absolute conviction few ever noticed the errors.
Thus were the tares of Moon’s lies of omission and subversions mixed in with the wheat of his brilliant revelations and original insights, showing even where he falls short, it is still irrefutable that he provided the “meat in due season” at the Summer of Love; 7 years after his marriage in 1960.
Demonstrating his incredible grasp of the Providence of Salvation in his book, it was his methodical, scientific, orderly and entirely correct unfolding of the expanding levels, along with the 3 Great Blessings unfolding in all 7 levels as well, and in both the Old and New Testaments: which is precisely where Moon tied them all together: without question. His written explanation in “Divine Principle” goes into the first 6 levels of restoration, leaving the 7th to himself, which gave him the hubris to attempt a reevaluation and deconstruction of Jesus and his stature, amounting to a total diminishing of my Father Lord Jesus, his Mission, and especially his Word. But the Truth and it’s witness as of the “Light” must be honored: wherever it is found. Rev. Moon, as with his forerunner John the Baptist, was “….not that Light…but came to bear Witness to that Light…”
The Truth and it’s witness, as of the “Light” must be honored —
And separated from Error, that evil servant, or “Darkness”
“…..Calling a ravenous bird from the east, the man that executeth my will from a far country:
yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it…..”
“….And that servant, which knew his lord’s will, and prepared not himself,
neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes….”
The Man who secretly Ruled America:
A Stairway to the Abyss
Really, looking at Rev. Moon’s concept of the “God of Day” and the “God of Night” we have absolute duality: but “Duality” is the “Fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” itself.
Choosing his friends in the Evangelical community like Falwell and Robertson was nothing but an infiltration of ISIS into Christianity, although Rev. Moon believed with his “female spirit” he had “discovered” the “secret” of the Holy Spirit, in fact it was MYSTERY herself who felled him.
But the MYSTERY of Babylon the Great is the Veil of ISIS: the Whore….
Thus in seeing the “Sun” as the Masculine Principle, set by God, to “rule the Day”, and the “Moon” as the Feminine Principle, set by God; to “rule the Night”, we have a superimposition of “Visible” and “Invisible”, exemplified in the Creation of God as signifying the “Visible” and Male organ, which is seen as External, and the “Invisible” as the Female organ, unseen as being Internal.
These facts are easily verifiable by observation.
The problem was that Rev. Moon made his two Gods diametric opposites; thus creating an “Absolutely Dual” and thus “discarnate” Creation of Good and Evil, whose “God” is very old: Abraxas….
The ‘God’ of Rev. Moon
The god of Good and Evil
Rev. Moon was not just a Korean billionaire who bought and sold politicians like pawns on a chessboard, even deciding that Newt Gingrich had been appointed by God to be President, after which this decision was nullified by the fact our Korean messenger died too early to call in all of his favors. But the fact that Rev. Moon is the one who revealed to George Bush the fact that Iraq and Iran were the Biblical entities known as “Gog and Magog”, which directly was the secret cause for Bush to invade Iraq, acting on the false pretext of the WMD, which to this day neatly covered up the truth: that Bush was told by Moon to believe he was sent by God, and to go to War: and that this very thing Bush believed is exactly the reason for what happened; which is an undeniable fact.
Bush said in print, although the interview was in France, that he felt more than once that God had chosen him to “do His Will“.
Rev. Moon even had him make sure to have at least 144,000 armed men on the ground in Iraq at all times, because Rev. Moon told him that the Host of Heaven is Numbered after “the Number of the ( Armed ) Children of Israel”. George took him at his word. But George never knew who he was dealing with. His father and Barbara never had a clue either. But the money was good: so they thought.
This is another wayward and unpopular fact, for which few who indeed were there will dare deny: who know the truth. But I am sure George Bush will verify my statements: if he wants to be remembered as something other than an incompetent blundering fool.
The Holy Child of Jesus,
seen in Mark 9:36-37
King James Version (KJV)
36 And he took a child, and set him in the midst of them: and when he had taken him in his arms, he said unto them,
37 “….. Whosoever shall receive one of such children in my name, receiveth me:
and whosoever shall receive me, receiveth not me,
but Him that sent me…..”
And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and his disciples rebuked those that brought them.
But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them,
“Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not:
for of such is the kingdom of God.
‘Verily I say unto you,
“Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God
as ( in the form of ) a little child, he shall not enter therein”….’
And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them….”
Mentioned again by Peter in Acts 4:30
Looking at the Restoration of the Providence of Salvation,
in light of Rev. Moon’s Three Great Errors,
and the Uncovering of the Truth:
Incandescent Accuracy on one hand, and Total Fallacious nonsense on the other:
The Misinterpretations of Scripture
in the book “Divine Principle”
…..and the Truth of the book of Moon
Few in the Unification Church ever took a critical look at what Rev. Moon said in relation to the Gospel of Christ, when he was offering his private interpretation of the Truth of the Design of Providence in relation to his own mission. Rev. Moon filled his books and lectures with literally thousands of comments and “secrets” about the providence which turned out to be errant nonsense, like his claim that Judas Iscariot was married to Mary Magdalene, or that John the Baptist was a beggar who went door-to-door, asking for handouts.
But Mary Magdalene was a sexually frigid hysteric who had never been touched by a man, until my Father healed her by casting out her 7 devils: and John the Baptist worked closely and was supported by followers with the Essenes at their Commune and Farm at the Dead Sea, which was only about a mile from where John spent most of his time baptizing.
But Rev. Moon never bothered with facts or knew any of the real details of my Father or his disciples, preferring to invent fables and make guesses since no one ever called him on any of his claims in his church.
And Judas Iscariot was virgin to both men and women; but desired men, not women: and of one man he was very jealous, one man in particular…. but in the fallen way of men, which is why it was said “…and one of ye is a devil…”. First seen in the gospel of John is seen in John that was with Mary of Bethany, at his father Simon the Leper’s house, complaining at her use of the ointment…, and then John writes again about Judas on the night of Passover, when my Father and the Apostles were to initiate a young man, who had only a white sheet over his naked body, into the Kingdom itself.
But for Judas, after striking the Shepherd with the sword of accusation that the ointment should have been sold for 300 pence and given to the poor; and only because his own possessive lust of the money he carried in the bag as their treasurer, that same bag that John says Judas stole from, and even worse, in his insane jealousy of Mary of Bethany, he betrayed my Father in his heart from then on for, thinking he now had the Sword of God.
As the Sufis say when people ask them “what the Sword of God is”: and they say; “The hungry stomachs of the Poor..”.
This is the sword Judas struck Jesus with, as it was written he would do, “…..for the sword shall strike the Shepherd….”
From the moment after Mary poured ointment upon my Father and washed his feet with her tears and dried them with her hair Judas decided to betray Jesus, and the sign by which he did so was with a kiss….but the Kiss was from the Man of Sodom; and a veritable Angel of Light, a minister of righteousness, Judas himself being an Apostle of Christ.
Judas was not like Moses,
the Wife of Jehovah….who
“…..Knew his Lord:
face to face….”
Unfortunately Judas did not understand a few things:
the first being this:
God is not a Sodomite…..
thus my Father said,
“….have I not chosen you 12: and one of you is a devil…..???”
The truth is far different than the stories and unfortunate untruths Rev. Moon fed his followers, as I learned through the last 24 years of instruction by my servant John the Divine, who is and was my teacher and guide in becoming the New Door, revealed as myself, standing at the beginning of the Path of the Just, by which all might enter the Kingdom by overcoming and rising at the Vertical Ascension of the 7 Overcoming’s seen in the 7 Churches, to meet my Father Jesus; in which the Kingdom of God is revealed as Eternity itself.
Let us observe the first example of how Rev. Moon played on the ignorance of his innocent and unread members…..
The Reality of the Fire, and the Unreality of Rev. Moon’s Interpretation
Let us look at his book “Divine Principle” on pages 114-15, ( 1973 Edition, Black Book )
On page 115 Rev. Moon states this;
“In Luke 12:49, Jesus said he came to cast fire upon the earth.
Nevertheless, we cannot find any signs of his judgment with literal fire at that time.
This then must be figurative speech.”
The problem here is that it was John the Baptist who said of Jesus that he would “baptize with the Holy Spirit, and with Fire“.
The operative phrase here is “Baptize“, not “Judge“.
Rev. Moon just made up his own interpretation, and discounts both John and Jesus, with telling results.
Rev. Moon decided Jesus didn’t Baptize with Fire, and this is because he didn’t know what John the Beloved was referring to, which was Jesus’ use of something the Jews and apparently Rev. Moon knew very little of: Divine Love. The “hot coals of burning fire” from the Altar represent the “Essence of Divine Love“, even as the Altar of Incense represents the Principle of Divine Love itself as the Soul of Christ.
Divine Love is the Fire that Jesus used and Baptized his followers and all who believed in him. They received this Baptism as he administered Mercy, and Forgiveness, and Healing. As John the Beloved wrote in his letters, “God is Love, whoso abideth in love: abides in God“. It was to this new idea of God that the Apostle Peter referred to when he said, “For our God is a Consuming Fire“.
Rev. Moon didn’t understand this concept apparently, so he writes.
“….James 3:6 says “the tongue is a fire.” Accordingly we understand that judgment by fire is judgment by the tongue, which naturally means judgment by the Word. Thus judgment by fire is judgment by the Word…..”
Now this seems to make perfect sense, and Rev. Moon then gives many examples of judgment by the word: but he has injected error into his line of reasoning right from the start by using as his foundation the tongue as that which is set on fire of hell, so that anyone who knew the scripture could immediately see what the real intent and mistake being made by Rev. Moon really is. Let us look at what Rev. Moon was quoting from James the Just, when he says that my Father Jesus was using a “tongue of fire” as “judgment by the Word” . Here is the passage:
2: For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body.
3: Behold , we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body.
4: Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth .
5: Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things . Behold , how great a matter a little fire kindleth !
6: And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
7: For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed , and hath been tamed of mankind :
8: But the tongue can no man tame ; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. …. “
We can see plainly that Jesus was not using this “fire’ in the way Rev. Moon states, but that Rev. Moon is himself using his own tongue to illustrate exactly how his “unruly tongue” was itself set on fire, as his reasoning was bereft of knowing how wrong this statement of his actually was, and was itself setting on fire “the course of nature“, and was “an unruly evil, full of deadly poison”…, and, most telling; “ set on fire of hell“.
This is the tongue of Rev. Moon himself in this passage, quite unfortunately for him; and his followers: especially they who did not know the scripture.
But the REAL problem in the “Divine Principle” is that Rev. Moon then INVALIDATES everything he writes next; and all the arguments he makes, following the incorrect Premise! Thus he is damaging the Word itself, by employing the incorrect definition of the Judgment as Fire: and thus subverts the entire concept of the coming Judgment he mentions completely. Why did this happen? The reasoning may surprise the reader, but the idea was to make seem right what is clearly wrong: Rev. Moon even repeats the sentence twice: “Thus Judgment by fire is judgment by the Word.”, and “Thus, judgment by fire signifies judgment by the Word.”
No: it does not…..
This misinterpretation is done by the absolutely brilliant method of introducing a false premise; and then deconstructing the entire argument by invalidating the real definition and then vitiating and robbing the passages that follow of their entire meaning. The worst part is that the totally accurate statements that follow the false initial one are then debased in the readers mind: thus quite deliberately and most unfortunately emptying the glorious passages he then quotes of all their vital truth and essence.
Let us look at the entire page 115, starting at the second paragraph.
“…….Let us then look up the Biblical verses concerning judgment by the Word. John 12:48 says that he who rejects Jesus and does not receive his sayings has a judge, and the Word that Jesus has spoken shall be his judge on the Last Day. II Thessalonians 2:8 says that the lawless one will be revealed, and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the “breath of his mouth”; that is, his Word. Further Isaiah 11:4 reads, “….and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth (tongue ) , and with the breath of his lips ( words ) he shall slay the wicked”; while John 5:24 says, “he who hears my Word, and believes Him who sent me, has eternal life; he does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.” Thus judgment by fire signifies judgment by the Word…..”
The immediate problem here is that the quote from Isaiah says nothing of the tongue being a fire, nor does John 12:48 and John 5:24; in fact in Isaiah it is likened to a Rod, and I assume Rev. Moon did not intend we see the breath of Jesus as “the fire of hell”; in truth the Rod is more like a Scepter, as it represents the Key of David in actuality; seen in the Cross of Christ: the Key itself to which Jesus stood as the Door it unlocked to those who Enter through the Death in Christ. The quote from John 12:48 is actually pointed at Rev. Moon himself, who rejected Jesus as the Son of God along with his sayings. How do we know this???
Let us take two of Jesus sayings and compare them to the words of Rev. Moon.
The Denial of the Resurrection of my Father Jesus in his Flesh and Bone
Let us start on page 360 of the “Divine Principle” in his section on ‘Moses and Jesus’. It is here that Rev. Moon commits his First Great Error, for in trying to break the Scripture and subvert the Testimony of Jesus he inadvertently plays into the hands of Satan the Devil, his real adversary, who he believed he had defeated. But the Shadow of Rev. Moon was Kim Il Sung, the discarnate Christ of Korea, his diametric opposite, who finally destroyed him. Rev. Moon writes,
“As well known through the Bible, Jesus after his resurrection was not the same Jesus who had lived with his disciples before his crucifixion. He was no longer a man seen through physical eyes, because he was a being transcendent of time and space. He once appeared suddenly in a room where his disciples were gathered ( John 20:19 ), while in another instance he appeared before two disciples going to Emmaus, and accompanied them for a long distance. But their eyes were kept from recognizing Jesus, who appeared before them ( Luke 24:15-16 ); and Jesus, who appeared, would again disappear suddenly. Jesus, in order to save mankind, had established the spiritual foundation of faith through the 40-day resurrection period to separate Satan, after giving up his physical body to the cross as a sacrifice.”
The immediate problem with this bit of spiritual materialism is the actual denial by Rev. Moon of the Resurrection by my Father Jesus in the flesh itself. In short he declares that Jesus was a now just ghost, a magical spirit who could “…appeared, would again disappear suddenly..“.
Here is the saying that Rev. Moon rejected from my Father, from Luke 24:36-37-38-39-40-41-42-43
36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them,
“Peace be unto you”.
37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.
38And he said unto them, “Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see;
for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have”.
40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them,
“Have ye here any meat?”
42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
43 And he took it, and did eat before them….”
Let us now compare:
Rev. Moon said:
” Jesus after his resurrection was not the same Jesus who had lived with his disciples before his crucifixion.”
My Father said:
“….Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see…”
It is obvious that Rev. Moon opposed this saying, as he rejected it completely. The fact that my Father ate fish and a piece of honeycomb was never mentioned by Rev. Moon because he would not have been able to make people doubt the actual resurrection unless he could first cast the very doubt which my Father had first appeared to dispel!!
Thus he tempted them to believe him and disbelieve my Father. But he doubted the validity and accuracy of the Scripture, and was ashamed of my Father’s sayings, as he then denied another one;
It is seen in this one, for example, where he quotes…
“…..he who rejects Jesus and does not receive his sayings has a judge,
and the Word that Jesus has spoken shall be his judge on the Last Day”.
Rev. Moon quietly disagreed, that’s why he buried this quote right here; completely out of context.
Nothing about tongues or fire: but a lot about being judged by the Word on the Last Day for rejecting my Father’s sayings. And who rejected them??
Rev. Moon…..in many places.
Rev. Moon denies many of the sayings of my Father directly, and thus casts doubt on the rest of His sayings of my Father in his Gospel everywhere one turns; to give us a false picture of the resurrection and prescience of Christ. But at the End the Word of my Father convicts him with his own words, as He said they would. But He also knew I would glorify Him, as Moon did not, once again: just like John the Baptist.
The Word of Truth
One of the toughest parts of dividing the Book of Moon, is that one cannot throw the Baby of Salvation out with the athwater of Sin. The definition of “Sin” itself is to “miss the mark”. Let us read what Rev. Moon wrote about my Father and His Word in his book on page 131. This entire passage and those which follow it, perfectly illustrate the real issue of Rev. Moon: he’s lukewarm. e never commits himself; and that is why he is spit out of the side of his Mouth.
Rev. Moon starts with this,
“…..Jesus did not say that his word was the truth, but that he himself was the way, the truth, and the life ( John 14:6 ). This is because his words were only a means of expressing himself as the truth; and the extent, degree and method of expressing the truth should vary according to those who receive the words. ( Underlining and emphasis are mine )
From this, we must realize that Biblical words are a means of expressing the truth and are not the truth itself. Seeing matters from this point of view, we can understand that the new Testament was given as a textbook for the teaching of truth to the people of 2,000 years ago, people whose spiritual and intellectual standard was very low, compared to that of today…..”
The immediate problem here is that my Father had in many places, and quite a few times told people like the “scribes and Pharisees” ( as what we would call present day “lawyers and businessmen” ) that He was telling them the truth.
And by the ‘truth” I am not speaking of the relativistic deconstruction Rev. Moon attempts to foist upon his own reason, and then that of the reader, by boldly lying through his teeth.
He states that my Father “…did not say that his word was the truth……”.
Let’s look at the Word of my Father, in the Gospel of Truth; John 8:28-47
So Jesus said (to them),
“When you lift up the Son of Man, then you will realize that I AM he, and that I do nothing of myself, but as my Father taught me, I speak these things.
29 The one who sent me is with me. The Father hath not left me alone, because I always do what is pleasing to him.”
30 Because he spoke this way, many came to believe in him.
31 Jesus then said to those Jews who believed in him,
“If you remain in my word, you will truly be my disciples,
32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
33 They answered him,
“We are descendants of Abraham and have never been enslaved to anyone. How can you say, ‘You will become free’?”
34 Jesus answered them , Verily, verily, I say to you, whosoever committeth sin is the slave of sin.
35 A slave does not remain in a household forever, but the Son always remains.
36 So if the Son therefore shall make ye free, ye shall be free indeed.
37 I know that you are descendants of Abraham. But ye seek to kill me, because my word has no place in you.
38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father
39 They answered and said to him,
“Our father is Abraham.”
Jesus said to them,
“If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works of Abraham.
40 But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God; Abraham did not do this.
41 You are doing the works of your father!” [So] they said to him, “We are not born of fornication; We have one Father, even God.”
42 Jesus said to them,
“If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and am here; I did not come on my own, but He sent me.
43 Why do you not understand what I am saying? Because you cannot bear to hear my word.
44 You belong to your father the devil and you willingly carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and the father of lies.
45 But because I speak the truth, you do not believe me.
46 Can any of you charge me with sin? If I am telling the truth, why do you not believe me?
47 He that is of God heareth God’s words, ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.”
According to Rev. Moon, my Father never spoke these words.
But here they are; in plain print.
45 But because I speak the truth, you do not believe me.
46 Can any of you charge me with sin? If I am telling the truth, why do you not believe me?
Let us investigate Rev. Moons claim that my Father “never said his word was the truth“; reading further.
On page 131 of the “Divine Principle” he then continues in his line of deconstructive, destructive reasoning, and says,
“…..It is thus impossible to satisfy completely man’s desire for truth, in this modern scientific civilization, by using the same method of expressing the truth, in parables and symbols, which was used to awaken people of an earlier age. In consequence, today the truth must appear with a higher standard and with a scientific method of expression in order to enable intelligent modrn man to understand it.
We call this the new truth….”
But the problem is that Rev. Moon is wrong; dead wrong,
because he never touches upon the prophetic core of my Father’s Word…
Rev. Moon then goes on to say that modern man needs to have a “new truth” with a higher standard to resolve “the problems of religion and science according to one unified theme”, to then erase “man’s internal and external ignorance”.
(Rev. Moon never died in Christ, and certainly never reached the position of my servant John, who started as the “disciple that Jesus loved”, and became known as “John the Beloved”. But John had the relationship John the Baptist, as Elijah, should have had. So who was John the Beloved???
Elisha; with twice the Spirit of Elijah. And John the Baptist was named for Jonathan, David’s best friend. Rev. Moon never even mentioned that because he didn’t know it. Or if he did, he kept it to himself, God knows why.)